Research reveals carbon footprint caused by China's irrigation system

March 13, 2012
China's groundwater irrigation system is responsible for polluting the atmosphere with more than 30 million tons of CO2 per year -- according to research from the University of East Anglia. Credit: Jinxia Wang, Centre for Chinese Agricultural Policy (CCAP)

China's groundwater irrigation system is responsible for polluting the atmosphere with more than 30 million tonnes of CO2 per year – according to research from the University of East Anglia.

Groundwater used for crop irrigation in has grown from 10 billion cubic metres in 1950 to more than 100 billion today.

A research paper, published today in Environmental Research Letters, estimates that the pumping systems which support this immense irrigation network annually produce 33.1 MtCO2e (33.1 mega tonnes of carbon dioxide equivalent).

China is the largest greenhouse gas emitter in the world, with around 17 per cent of emissions coming from agriculture. Irrigated agriculture in China produces 70 per cent of the country's grain. But it takes some 500 litres of water to grow the wheat for one small loaf of bread.

Pollution is caused by the huge amount of energy needed to pump water from underground – in some areas from an average depth of 70 meters. This research is the first to calculate how much pollution is being created.

It is the result of a collaboration between the university's School of International Development, the UEA Water Security Research Centre and the UEA-based Tyndall Centre for Climate Change Research, with the Centre for Chinese Agricultural Policy, the Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences and Cranfield University.

The research team used extensive survey data collected from 366 villages in 11 provinces. They up-scaled these results to calculate the emissions created by groundwater pumping across China's remaining 20 provinces.

The results account for more than 0.5 per cent of China's total CO2 emissions. For comparison, this is similar to the total amount of CO2 that the whole of New Zealand emits in one year.

Prof Declan Conway, from UEA's school of international Development and the Tyndall Centre, said: "Generally, there is a surprising gap in research knowledge about the energy required for water use. Irrigation is fundamental to food security in China as it is the world's second largest irrigator. It is vital that we understand the sources of greenhouse gas emissions in agricultural water use to design and implement sustainable policies for the future."

Prof Jinxia Wang of the Centre for Chinese Agricultural Policy said: "Improved access to pumping technology, cheap energy and the ability to directly control water availability has led to a massive expansion of pumping across large parts of Asia, particularly in China and India. The small scale of pump operations makes regulation and control of use extremely difficult."

Sabrina Rothausen from UEA added: "Water scarcity in China is already driving policies to improve water conservation so it is crucial to identify water-energy trade-offs and potential co-benefits. Our results suggest that an integrated policy approach could promote considerable water and energy savings."

With a growing population, climate change and socio-economic transition, the report predicts the problem will worsen unless action is taken to improve China's management policies.

Explore further: Much irrigation water comes from non-sustainable sources

More information: J. Wang, S.G.S.A Rothausen, D. Conway, L. Zhang, W. Xiong, I.P. Holman and Y. Li (2012) China's water-energy nexus: greenhouse-gas emissions from groundwater use for agriculture. Environmental Research Letters 7 014035.

Related Stories

Fertilizer wastage costs China 52 million tons of grain

May 27, 2011

If China could divide its available fertilizers better among its provinces, it could produce 52 million tons more grain. This would enable China to tackle its growing demand for food and animal feed within its own borders.

Counting the cost of water

May 23, 2006

Economic expansion in China is threatening the country’s scarce water resources, according to a new study by the University of Leeds. Uneven development of trade across the country means that water-intensive or polluting ...

Recommended for you

Hot spot at Hawaii? Not so fast

August 18, 2017

Through analysis of volcanic tracks, Rice University geophysicists have concluded that hot spots like those that formed the Hawaiian Islands aren't moving as fast as recently thought.

Supervolcanoes: A key to America's electric future?

August 16, 2017

Most of the lithium used to make the lithium-ion batteries that power modern electronics comes from Australia and Chile. But Stanford scientists say there are large deposits in sources right here in America: supervolcanoes.

Greenland ice flow likely to speed up

August 16, 2017

Flow of the Greenland Ice Sheet is likely to speed up in the future, despite a recent slowdown, because its outlet glaciers slide over wet sediment, not hard rock, new research based on seismic surveys has confirmed. This ...

Climate change will cut crop yields: study

August 15, 2017

Climate change will have a negative effect on key crops such as wheat, rice, and maize, according to a major scientific report out Tuesday that reviewed 70 prior studies on global warming and agriculture.


Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

2.3 / 5 (3) Mar 13, 2012
CO2 is a pollutant right!!!! I didn't know that UEA gave Doctorates in propaganda.
3 / 5 (2) Mar 13, 2012
That is lots of energy used. But it is also lots of water pumped. That water has taken years to form. I wonder when they notice that they don't have anymore groundwater to pump.
not rated yet Mar 14, 2012
Hopefully the article published efficiency values for the pumps, addressing the potential differences in efficiencies for those pumps used in the deeper wells versus those in shallower wells, factoring the amounts of water pumped from each type of well and each level of efficiency for the pumps. Then with performing an ANOVA to ensure that there was no significant differences that might confound the research, one could have a basis from which to start an analysis of this subject. CO2 levels then would be estimated based on the efficiency of the local power production to the pumps/each type of pump in the area - to then have a cost/CO2 basis from which to speculate on the CO2 cost. Afterwards, the harvested crops (beneficiaries of the CO2 production), could be assessed for the CO2 sink they become (minus harvesting & transport - additional CO2 cost).
AS LONG AS THE ANOVA for the different regions vs the transport costs vs water cost is factored in : THEN IT BECOMES A RESEARCH STUDY!

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.