Journal urges Ottawa to stop muzzling scientists

March 2, 2012
The internet homepage of the US scientific magazine Nature. Nature called on the Canadian government in an online editorial Friday to "set its scientists free" and allow them to speak about their research.

The science journal Nature called on the Canadian government in an online editorial Friday to "set its scientists free" and allow them to speak about their research.

"It is time for the to set its scientists free," Nature said in a rebuke of a "gradual tightening of media protocols for federal scientists" since Prime Minister Stephen Harper's Conservatives won power in 2006.

The editorial described a "confused and Byzantine approach to the press" by the Harper government, "prioritizing message control and showing little understanding of the importance of the free flow of ."

"Researchers who once would have felt comfortable responding freely and promptly to are now required to direct inquiries to a media relations office, which demands written questions in advance, and might not permit scientists to speak," it said.

"Prominent researchers have been prevented from discussing published, peer-reviewed literature."

Nature called on Ottawa to heed complaints from the Canadian Science Writers' Association and other groups critical of the "muzzling of publicly funded scientists."

These were outlined in a letter to Harper sent mid-February, which lists examples such as Environment Canada's David Tarasick being prevented from speaking to the press about his research.

Explore further: Canadian medical journal editors are fired

Related Stories

Canadian medical journal editors are fired

February 22, 2006

The Canadian Medical Association has fired two of the leading editors of its peer-reviewed journal, reportedly in a dispute over editorial independence.

Canada's PM lauds Nobel laureate Steinman

October 3, 2011

Canada's prime minister paid tribute Monday to Canadian cell biologist Ralph Steinman, who died days before being awarded the Nobel Prize for Medicine for his pioneering work on the immune system.

Recommended for you

Ancient DNA offers new view on saber-toothed cats' past

October 19, 2017

Researchers who've analyzed the complete mitochondrial genomes from ancient samples representing two species of saber-toothed cats have a new take on the animals' history over the last 50,000 years. The data suggest that ...

Six degrees of separation: Why it is a small world after all

October 19, 2017

It's a small world after all - and now science has explained why. A study conducted by the University of Leicester and KU Leuven, Belgium, examined how small worlds emerge spontaneously in all kinds of networks, including ...

Scientists see order in complex patterns of river deltas

October 19, 2017

River deltas, with their intricate networks of waterways, coastal barrier islands, wetlands and estuaries, often appear to have been formed by random processes, but scientists at the University of California, Irvine and other ...

3 comments

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

denijane
5 / 5 (1) Mar 04, 2012
""Researchers who once would have felt comfortable responding freely and promptly to journalists are now required to direct inquiries to a media relations office, which demands written questions in advance, and might not permit scientists to speak," it said."

That's ridiculous. It's hard enough to get the public interested in your research, I can't believe that the authorities intentionally prevent scientists from talking. Why?! There are sensitive researches, but they are very very few. And if something is published in peer-reviewed journal (ot any journal acutally), it's public - everybody can read it. Then why this absurd policy?!
Vendicar_Decarian
5 / 5 (1) Mar 04, 2012
Because Canada has a Conservative government, and Conservatives are the pure ignorance and pure evil.

"That's ridiculous. It's hard enough to get the public interested in your research, I can't believe that the authorities intentionally prevent scientists from talking. Why?"
Callippo
not rated yet Mar 04, 2012
Interestingly it's just the Nature journal, which applies the most stringent rules for publications and which prohibits the scientists in presentation of their results anywhere else. Refereed Journals: Do They Insure Quality or Enforce Orthodoxy?

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.