Research duo maps worldwide water footprint with high spatial resolution

February 14, 2012 by Bob Yirka report
The green, blue, and gray water footprints within nations in the period 1996-2005. (c)PNAS, doi:10.1073/pnas.1109936109

( -- Arjen Hoekstra and Mesfin Mekonnen from the University of Twente in the Netherlands have created a worldwide water footprint map at a higher spatial resolution than has been seen before; and as they describe in their paper published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, most (92%) of the water used by people the world over, goes to growing food. They also find that about a fifth of all water used goes towards products that are exported, creating, what they describe as a “virtual” water export business.

A virtual footprint is one where the entire amount of water that goes into producing a product is taken into account. For example, when electronics products are made, water is used in the production of electricity used by the factories to run their machines. Water is also used to make the plastics that are used in casings and wire. It’s also used in the sense that quite often manufacturing results in polluting water making it no longer be useable for another purpose. All of these things add up to a virtual footprint for every product made which the researchers then combined to construct a map of the world showing how water is really used.

One interesting finding that comes up is the sad reality that more advanced countries are importing from those that are less advanced as water resources are used to create those products that are made locally and used somewhere else; a situation that if continued, could lead to depletion of water resources in those countries if that water is withdrawn from nonrenewable sources such as underground aquifers.

To come up with their map, the researchers examined water usages patterns for the years 1996 through 2005, as blocks of the land surface of the Earth made up of 85 square kilometers. Then each block was examined (using data from the country to which it belonged) to discern its water usage. Once all the blocks were filled in the researchers had their map. As part of the process, the water footprint of individual countries was calculated and the findings aren’t likely to surprise anyone. Those people that live in highly developed countries tend to consume more water per capita than do those from less highly developed countries. The United States for example, was calculated as having a footprint of 2,842 m3/y, compared to a worldwide average of just 1,385 m3/y.

Another point the makes clear is that water has become a true commodity, though its ownership is still constantly in debate, and as such, soon it will have to bought, sold or traded just as other precious commodities currently are or conflicts will likely arise.

Explore further: Clothing, food and electricity impact most on water footprint

More information: The water footprint of humanity, PNAS, Published online before print February 13, 2012, doi: 10.1073/pnas.1109936109

This study quantifies and maps the water footprint (WF) of humanity at a high spatial resolution. It reports on consumptive use of rainwater (green WF) and ground and surface water (blue WF) and volumes of water polluted (gray WF). Water footprints are estimated per nation from both a production and consumption perspective. International virtual water flows are estimated based on trade in agricultural and industrial commodities. The global annual average WF in the period 1996–2005 was 9,087 Gm3/y (74% green, 11% blue, 15% gray). Agricultural production contributes 92%. About one-fifth of the global WF relates to production for export. The total volume of international virtual water flows related to trade in agricultural and industrial products was 2,320 Gm3/y (68% green, 13% blue, 19% gray). The WF of the global average consumer was 1,385 m3/y. The average consumer in the United States has a WF of 2,842 m3/y, whereas the average citizens in China and India have WFs of 1,071 and 1,089 m3/y, respectively. Consumption of cereal products gives the largest contribution to the WF of the average consumer (27%), followed by meat (22%) and milk products (7%). The volume and pattern of consumption and the WF per ton of product of the products consumed are the main factors determining the WF of a consumer. The study illustrates the global dimension of water consumption and pollution by showing that several countries heavily rely on foreign water resources and that many countries have significant impacts on water consumption and pollution elsewhere.

Related Stories

Virtual water cannot remedy freshwater shortage

June 7, 2011

The implementation of virtual water into trading deals has been suggested as a realistic solution to solving the global inequality of renewable freshwater, but new research suggests that it may not be as revolutionary as ...

Calculating water footprints of animal, plant proteins

January 31, 2011

Many times more water is needed for the production of meat and other animal products, such as eggs and dairy produce, than for the production of plant products. The University of Twente (The Netherlands) has for the first ...

Counting the cost of water

May 23, 2006

Economic expansion in China is threatening the country’s scarce water resources, according to a new study by the University of Leeds. Uneven development of trade across the country means that water-intensive or polluting ...

Recommended for you

New research could predict La Nina drought years in advance

November 16, 2017

Two new studies from The University of Texas at Austin have significantly improved scientists' ability to predict the strength and duration of droughts caused by La Niña - a recurrent cooling pattern in the tropical Pacific ...

1 comment

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

4.3 / 5 (4) Feb 14, 2012
Another point the map makes clear is that water has become a true commodity, though its ownership is still constantly in debate, and as such, soon it will have to bought, sold or traded just as other precious commodities currently are or conflicts will likely arise.

Water has always been a commodity.
Water has always been, "bought, sold or traded (for)."
Water Rights are well settled law, where there is law.
Water has often been the most precious of commodities.
Water has often been fought over.

Folks get paid to do this?

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.