Great apes make sophisticated decisions

December 29, 2011

Chimpanzees, orangutans, gorillas and bonobos make more sophisticated decisions than was previously thought. Great apes weigh their chances of success, based on what they know and the likelihood to succeed when guessing, according to a study of MPI researcher Daniel Haun, published on December 21 in the online journal PLoS ONE. The findings may provide insight into human decision-making as well.

The authors of the study, led by Daniel Haun of the Max Planck Institutes for Psycholinguistics (Nijmegen) and (Leipzig), investigated the behaviour of all four non-human great . The apes were presented with two banana pieces: a smaller one, which was always reliably in the same place, and a larger one, which was hidden under one of multiple cups, and therefore the riskier choice.

The researchers found that the apes' choices were regulated by their uncertainty and the probability of success for the risky choice, suggesting sophisticated decision-making. Apes chose the small piece more often when they where uncertain where the large piece was hidden. The lower their chances to guess correctly, the more often they chose the small piece.

Risky choices

The researchers also found that the apes went for the larger piece – and risked getting nothing at all – no less than 50% of the time. This risky decision-making increased to nearly 100% when the size difference between the two banana pieces was largest. While all four species demonstrated sophisticated decision making strategies, chimpanzees and orangutans were overall more likely to make relative to gorillas and bonobos. The precise reason for this discrepancy remains unknown.

Haun concludes: "Our study adds to the growing evidence that the mental life of the other great apes is much more sophisticated than is often assumed."

Explore further: Apes unwilling to gamble when odds are uncertain

Related Stories

Apes unwilling to gamble when odds are uncertain

November 24, 2010

( -- Humans are known to play it safe in a situation when they aren't sure of the odds, or don’t have confidence in their judgments. We don’t like to choose the unknown.

Great apes know they could be wrong

March 24, 2010

orangutans, chimpanzees, bonobos and gorillas - realize that they can be wrong when making choices, according to Dr. Josep Call from the Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology in Leipzig, Germany. Dr. Call's study ...

Treaty: last chance to save great apes

September 12, 2005

A treaty signed during the weekend in the Democratic Republic of Congo reportedly might be the world's last chance to save great apes from extinction.

Bonobos say no by shaking their heads

May 7, 2010

( -- Scientists report having observed and filmed bonobos (also known as pygmy chimpanzees) shaking their heads to say “no” to prevent an unwanted behavior in another animal. Bonobos have never before been ...

Humans like to work together in solving tasks, chimps don't

October 13, 2011

Recent studies have shown that chimpanzees possess many of the cognitive prerequisites necessary for humanlike collaboration. Cognitive abilities, however, might not be all that differs between chimpanzees and humans when ...

Great apes think ahead

June 18, 2008

Apes can plan for their future needs just as we humans can – by using self-control and imagining future events. Mathias and Helena Osvath's research, from Lunds University Cognitive Science in Sweden, is the first to provide ...

Recommended for you

Mating induces sexual inhibition in female jumping spiders

October 18, 2017

After mating for the first time, most females of an Australian jumping spider are unreceptive to courtship by other males, and this sexual inhibition is immediate and often lasts for the rest of their lives, according to ...

Understanding the coevolving web of life as a network

October 18, 2017

Coevolution, which occurs when species interact and adapt to each other, is often studied in the context of pair-wise interactions between mutually beneficial symbiotic partners. But many species have mutualistic interactions ...


Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

not rated yet Dec 29, 2011
Nothing "sophisticated" here--the visual system in much simpler animals does this kind of Bayes information processing. The real test is whether they can do it in the presence of distractions.
3 / 5 (2) Dec 29, 2011
I read somewhere that in ancient times great apes were sometimes considered to be just another race of humans.
1 / 5 (2) Dec 29, 2011
Laziness and intelligence are not the same thing: paint the the large banana with crack cocaine and you may be suprised to learn that the pevious behaviour was sheer laziness as shall be proven when the ape get's a little "chemical" motivation and puts forth the effort to find the big banana's great rewards.

Don't call it reason! Call it sloth. The alpha male gets all the bananas he wants and for that matter all the females he wants as well. He is alpha because he combines physical ability with great motivation: the most powerful combination in the animal kingdom.

Laziness is not evidence of a highly evolved mind but rather a mind that is not properly being employed because of a lack of proper motivation.

I recently visited the Cheyenne Mountain Zoo:
w w w.cmzoo. o r g

and when I walked through the house of the great apes I saw an ape sit next to the glass, stick his finger down his throat, throw up on the window sill, then slurp it all up: he did it over and over!
5 / 5 (7) Dec 29, 2011
" Laziness is not evidence of a highly evolved mind but rather a mind that is not properly being employed because of a lack of proper motivation. "

~ Crapton

Yet, if you want to know the easiest way to do a hard job, you give the job to a lazy man.

Laziness is the father of invention.
3 / 5 (5) Dec 29, 2011
"Laziness is the father of invention."

No. Laziness is the father of gimmicks.

Diligent men are the fathers of invention:

Alfred Nobel-Dynamite
Nikola Tesla-AC motors/radio
Thomas Edison-incandescent bulbs
Charles Goodyear-vulcanized rubber
Rudolf Diesel-the diesel engine
Al Gore-Global Warming
et al.

There are many diligent women who are the Mothers of invention:

Stephanie Kwolek-kevlar
Mary Anderson-windshield wiper blade
et al.

Laziness leads to nothing! or in the case of this article a smaller banana.
5 / 5 (7) Dec 29, 2011
This study is a throwback to the inane animal studies of the 19th century. I think humans choose the smallest portion of animal understanding every time, because the acknowledgement of the enormity of innate animal logic and intelligence is too threatening to the fragile human ego.
4.2 / 5 (5) Dec 30, 2011
Laziness is just another way to say expend the minimum amount of energy to gain the minimum reward needed to achieve your goal.

In terms of survival (apparent) laziness has massive advantages as wasting energy can lead to starvation and death - do enough to survive and no more.

I fully agree with Telekinetics take on this type of experiment and the fragility of the human ego.
not rated yet Dec 31, 2011
One day somebody does this with cats and dogs, later somebody else with mice, and then somebody with a snail. And each time the scientific community goes Ohh and Wow, while everybody else just yawn.

This truly is one area where scientists make only the tiniest of steps, almost grudginly. Oh, what we'd know today, if only...

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.