Channeling corporate cash and asset reserves into job creation

December 7, 2011

U.S. commercial banks and large nonfinancial corporations have been carrying huge cash hoards and other liquid assets, totaling $1.4 trillion. At the same time, small businesses have been locked out of credit markets, preventing them from expanding. In "19 Million Jobs for U.S. Workers: The Impact of Channeling $1.4 Trillion in Excess Liquid Asset Holdings into Productive Investments," Robert Pollin, James Heintz, Heidi Garrett-Peltier and Jeannette Wicks-Lim of the Political Economy Research Institute at the University of Massachusetts Amherst examine the impact that mobilizing these excess liquid assets into productive investments could have on job creation. They find that if we moved those liquid assets into business expansions, U.S. employment could expand by about 19 million jobs by the end of 2014, with unemployment falling below 5 percent.

Commercial banks have been able to build up their excessive in large part because Federal Reserve policies for the past 2 1/2 years have enabled the banks to borrow cash at a near-zero interest rate. And large nonfinancial corporations are using their massive holdings of $2 trillion in liquid assets for various forms of financial engineering, such as stock buybacks, rather than expanding their operations, investing in research, development and productive equipment, and hiring more workers.

If the roughly $1.4 trillion now being held as excess liquid assets were channeled into productive investments and job creation over a period of three years, this could, virtually on its own, solve the country’s employment crisis. If the funds were to begin moving into productive investments early in 2012, about 19 million new jobs would be generated by the end of 2014.

These 19 million jobs would be spread across all sectors, regions, occupations and credential levels. In addition, the authors have sketched an approach in which priority sectors--building retrofits, infrastructure, community health clinics, and small businesses generally--would receive an extra share of the total increase in investments.

They also present regional case studies of Los Angeles and Seattle. Los Angeles’ share of the national $1.4 trillion in new investments and business expansions would expand employment in the region by 785,000 by 2014, and drop the regional unemployment rate to 6.1 percent. Similar benefits would result in Seattle, where employment could expand by over 230,000 jobs and the unemployment rate drop to 5.8 percent.

As the report’s lead author, Robert Pollin, explains, "There is no reason that the U.S. needs to remain stuck in a long-term unemployment crisis. Getting the banks and corporations to move their hoards into productive investments and requires carrots and sticks -- policies such as a new round of government spending stimulus as well as taxes on the banks’ excess reserves -- that can both strengthen overall market demand and unlock credit markets for . Enacting such measures as quickly as possible is the best route for restoring jobs and opportunity in this economy."

Explore further: New analysis of government data shows that military spending is a weak job engine compared to other investments

Related Stories

Cash hoarding nothing new for businesses, scholar says

September 8, 2010

The U.S. economy is experiencing anemic growth, yet businesses are sitting on a mountain of cash worth nearly $2 trillion, according to Federal Reserve estimates. But this trend is nothing new for firms, who have been steadily ...

Bailed-out banks issued riskier loans

September 15, 2011

Banks that received federal bailout money ended up approving riskier loans and shifting capital toward risky investments after getting government help, say University of Michigan researchers.

Report finds turnaround in tech industry

April 19, 2006

A new report found that 61,000 net jobs were added to the hi-tech industry for a total of 5.6 million tech jobs in 2005, indicating a turnaround in the industry, according to a trade association.

Slash in corporate investment creating long-term problems

February 3, 2009

A deep and lingering credit crisis is throttling investment in moneymaking projects that could help jump-start a U.S. economy mired in its worst downturn in decades, a new survey of corporate executives shows.

Recommended for you

The oldest plesiosaur was a strong swimmer

December 14, 2017

Plesiosaurs were especially effective swimmers. These long extinct "paddle saurians" propelled themselves through the oceans by employing "underwater flight"—similar to sea turtles and penguins. Paleontologist from the ...

Averaging the wisdom of crowds

December 12, 2017

The best decisions are made on the basis of the average of various estimates, as confirmed by the research of Dennie van Dolder and Martijn van den Assem, scientists at VU Amsterdam. Using data from Holland Casino promotional ...


Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

3 / 5 (6) Dec 07, 2011
The study identifies a very real impediment to economic expansion. That is, that banks are receiving money from the federal government at essentially zero interest.

The obvious solution is for the federal government to stop funding banks at near zero interest rates. Allow interest rates to be reflective of market forces instead.

Unfortunately, the study recommends instead stimulus spending and taxes.

Just another attempt by liberals to sell increases in spending and increases in taxes.
not rated yet Dec 07, 2011
The most likely effect of getting US companies to unload their $1.4 trillion would be to create lots of productive jobs--but outside the US that would (through substituting US manufactures with imports) up US unemployment even more.
2.3 / 5 (3) Dec 07, 2011
"In "19 Million Jobs for U.S. Workers: The Impact of Channeling $1.4 Trillion in Excess Liquid Asset Holdings into Productive Investments,""

Some readers may be unaware that this $1.4 trillion number is not some "hard science" figure that should be -- pardon the pun -- banked on.

In reality, the authors, who have clear tendencies towards their preferred outcome, have made a judgment call on the amount of "excess" liquidity. They may be way off. It's hard to tell without seeing their data. But, defining excess liquidity is something that no two economists can agree on. Let alone the hundreds of thousands of businesses they've summed up to reach their number.

3 / 5 (4) Dec 07, 2011
"new round of government spending stimulus"
The old round did not work for the US and has not worked in Japan for over 20 years.
If the govt starts taxing cash, that cash will disappear into other countries.

"Enacting such measures as quickly as possible is the best route for restoring jobs and opportunity in this economy.""
I guess the govt-university complex is launching its campaign to elect Obama.
2 / 5 (4) Dec 07, 2011
It's a mutual admiration society between the Liberal Michael Moores, the Socialists in the WH, the Liberal Hollywood crowd, (some with pedophilic tendencies), and the Socialists/Communists in academia. So it is now suggested to induce. . .the beginning of a money-grab from legitimate owners or custodians of the surplus cash. And who will be the one(s) to determine who gets that cash? In which industries will the "investments" provide a fresh work force? Will the moneys go to the darlings of the Liberals, i.e. "green" companies like Solyndra? Probably go to line the pockets of the DNC also.
0.1 / 5 (35) Dec 11, 2011
"The old round did not work for the US" - RyggTard

It kept your ignorant ass out of a decades long, grand economic depression.

"If the govt starts taxing cash, that cash will disappear into other countries." - RyggTard

Didn't Bushies Conservative Economic Policies devalue the U.S. dollar by around 50% over the 8 years he was in office. Primarily as a result of him printing money?

Is it your plan to repeat the mistakes of the 1920's and cut spending early to trigger the next Republican Depression?

3 / 5 (2) Dec 11, 2011
Note the absence of 'progressives' posting here, except to call others names.
Socialist policies created the problems and won't fix them.

Einstein describes socialist economic policy:
"Insanity: doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results.
Albert Einstein"
1 / 5 (1) Dec 11, 2011
"While America is clearly broke, the Obama Administration is redistributing our wealth to other nations, according to Southerland, through the Federal Reserve and the IMF.
Southerland derides the wealth and money flowing like honey around Washington, D.C.s power centers, evidenced by nine construction cranes visible from the U.S. Capitol. He would be hard pressed, he said, to find nine in the entire state of Florida.

Read more: http://dailycalle...gI0q3Jrl
0.1 / 5 (34) Dec 12, 2011
That is an astonishing claim Tard Boy. It means one of two things. Either you are spectacularly ignorant of how the IMF and Federal Reserve work, or you know that those organizations are not controlled by Obama in which case you are simply lying.

So which is it Tard Boy? Are you once again a liar, or have you once again proven yourself to be a Libertarian/Randite Fool?

You know. I have never encountered a Libertarian who wasn't a congenital and perpetual liar.

"While America is clearly broke, the Obama Administration is redistributing our wealth to other nations, according to Southerland, through the Federal Reserve and the IMF." - Ryggtatd
0.1 / 5 (34) Dec 12, 2011
"Insanity: doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results." - Albert Einstein

Pretty much sums up the Borrow and Spend Economic policies of your Republican Brothers doesn't it RyggTard?

Tard Boy... Can you tell us what the "Starve the beast" economic program promoted by your fellow Libertarians was intended to do?


"Starving the beast" is a fiscal-political strategy of some American conservatives[1][2][3] to cut taxes in order to deprive the government of revenue in a deliberate effort to create a fiscal budget crisis that would then force the federal government to reduce spending. The short and medium term effect of the strategy has been increased United States public debt rather than reduced spending.

0.1 / 5 (34) Dec 12, 2011
Economist Paul Krugman summarized the strategy in February 2010: "Rather than proposing unpopular spending cuts, Republicans would push through popular tax cuts, with the deliberate intention of worsening the governments fiscal position. Spending cuts could then be sold as a necessity rather than a choice, the only way to eliminate an unsustainable budget deficit." - Paul Krugman Nobel winning Economist.

"please [Congress], starve the beast, don't perpetuate the problem, don't fund the largesse, we need to cut taxes." - Sarah Palin

Economist Bruce Bartlett called the Libertarian "Starve the Beast" movement "the most pernicious fiscal doctrine in history."

"Borrowing a trillion dollars plus was the greatest thing we ever did." - Reagan budget advisor.
0.1 / 5 (34) Dec 12, 2011
"While America is clearly broke, the Obama Administration is redistributing our wealth to other nations, according to (Steve) Southerland, through the Federal Reserve and the IMF." - RyggTard


Steve Southerland, 46, left his funeral home business to run for Congress nearly two years ago.

Funeral home.. Ahahahahahah....

Another Republican Economics "expert" with a Blog.


1 / 5 (1) Dec 12, 2011
The living organisms are slowing their metabolism under poor living conditions or they seek for better food. The investments into industrial sector have no meaning, if they just lead to higher consumption of unrecoverable resources and growth of their prices. What's worse, there is always great temptation for governmental officers to use the newly collected taxes for their own purposes, i.e. for growth of employment and even salaries in governmental sector. Such result indeed increases the cost and economical overhead of government even more.

The only solution is therefore the finding of better resources, i.e. to start with implementation of cold fusion.
0.1 / 5 (34) Dec 12, 2011
What a shame the E-Cat demo was such a spectacular failure.
0.1 / 5 (35) Dec 12, 2011
"When was Rand arrested for failing to pay income taxes or FICA or Medicare payments?" = RyggTard

Never as far as I know. Are you saying that Ayn Rand was Entitled to collect welfare and Medicaid?

Shouldn't she have died in the streets from her self inflicted lung cancer as she claimed others should do when they could not afford treatment?

And don't you think it was poetic justice that she spent her entire life denying that smoking caused cancer and claiming that the worlds doctors and scientists were involved in a global conspiracy to restrict her freedom to smoke, only for her to have developed lung cancer from smoking?

Odd, her denial that smoking causes cancer is almost identical in form to your denial that CO2 causes global warming. Right down to the claim that the worlds scientists are involved in a conspiracy to limit your freedom.

Is there no limit to Libertarian\Randite ideological failure?

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.