Lawmakers question WHouse role in wireless project

Lawmakers this week raised fresh questions about the proposed network by Virginia-based Lightsquared
A man uses a laptop computer at a wireless cafe. Republican lawmakers say the White House may have tried to push through a company's proposed wireless network despite objections from the military that the project could disrupt vital satellite navigation systems.

Republican lawmakers say the White House may have tried to push through a company's proposed wireless network despite objections from the military that the project could disrupt vital satellite navigation systems.

Lawmakers this week raised fresh questions about the proposed network by Virginia-based Lightsquared, a firm backed by billionaire Philip Falcone, a prominent donor to Obama's Democratic party.

At a hearing Thursday of the House of Representatives strategic forces subcommittee, the Republican chairman, Michael Turner, said he would request that the House Oversight Committee investigate whether the company received special treatment from the White House or federal regulators.

The hearing came after a report in the Daily Beast website alleged the White House pressed the head of US Air Force space command, General William Shelton, to downplay his concerns and alter his testimony to lawmakers.

President Barack Obama's administration denies the allegations, and Lightsquared has rejected charges it is getting special favors.

Republican staff members of the committee alleged the Air Force general told lawmakers that Obama administration officials lobbied him to express support in his testimony for the Lightsquare proposal, the Washington Post reported Friday.

At Thursday's hearing, Shelton said the proposed by Lightsquared would interfere with the (GPS) relied on by the military and .

Tests with Defense Department experts, civilian agencies and others "indicate the LightSquared terrestrial network operating in the originally proposed manner poses significant challenges for almost all GPS users," Shelton told the committee.

The general's spokeswoman insisted Friday that Shelton had not watered down his testimony due to alleged pressure. "General Shelton's testimony was his own supported by and focused purely on documented test results," Colonel Kathleen Cook told AFP.

The company originally planned to provide only satellite phones on its network, but the Federal Communications Commission issued a waiver to the firm in January allowing LightSquared to offer terrestrial-based wireless service to companies.

The Defense Department has raised concerns about interference with GPS users previously, and the FCC has promised not to allow the firm to begin operating until more testing is carried out to ensure there is no disruption to satellite navigation users.

The head of the FCC declined to appear before the committee on Thursday, which the chairman, Turner, called an "affront" to the panel.


Explore further

Tests show wireless network could harm GPS systems

(c) 2011 AFP

Citation: Lawmakers question WHouse role in wireless project (2011, September 17) retrieved 26 April 2019 from https://phys.org/news/2011-09-lawmakers-whouse-role-wireless.html
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.
0 shares

Feedback to editors

User comments

Sep 17, 2011
Are the Republicans suggesting that if the military went into enemy territory they would be defeated by LightSquared? The DoD can adapt. Let the people have another wireless service.

As for other company's objections, its pretty easy to figure that one out. Whaaaaa whaaaa its competition... whaaaa save me from the big bad Obama whaaaa.

Sep 17, 2011
Difficulties for ALL GPS users.
All your car navigation systems will be rendered useless.
Lightsquared can then buy everyone a new navigation system.

Sep 18, 2011
Who needs GPS if we have connectivity like LightSquared! GPS is old space tech. Technologies like LightSquared would help us leap into a new paradigm in information. The military shouldn't interfere with the US economy anyway. The health and competitive market environment of the US supersedes military technical issues since it is our economic wealth that pays for the military.

Sep 18, 2011
Please go look up what GPS is. GPS is not a connectivity service, its a timing and location service. The reason it exists is the US military and you are almost certainly using it even if you don't own a GPS receiver.

And this is not a military issue, military GPS receivers are more resistant to interference then civilian receivers. They have given this wireless company a frequency range that threats to disrupt normal GPS receptions.

The European system isn't up yet so basically you have a well connected billionare pushing through a wireless company that will force Americans to use the Russian GLONASS system (if you can find a receiver) because they are disrupting the US government GPS signal. Its absolutely idiotic.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more