Globular clusters on a plane

Globular clusters on a plane
Smaller satellite galaxies caught by a spiral galaxy are distorted into elongated structures consisting of stars, which are known as tidal streams, as shown in this artist's impression. Credit: Jon Lomberg

Globular clusters are generally some of the oldest structures in our galaxy. Many of the most famous ones formed around the same time as our galaxy, some 13 billion years ago. However, some are distinctly younger. While many classification schemes are used, one breaks globular clusters into three groups: an old halo group which includes the oldest of the clusters, those in the disk and bulge of the galaxy which tend to have higher metallicity, and a younger population of halo clusters. The latter of these provides a bit of a problem since the galaxy should have settled into a disk by the time they formed, depriving them of the necessary materials to form in the first place. But a new study suggests a solution that’s not of this galaxy.

The new study looked at the distribution of these younger clusters around our Milky Way. Of the three classifications for globular clusters discussed, the young halo clusters are scattered well beyond the range of the other populations. The young halo extends to as much as 120 kiloparsecs (400 thousand light years) while the old halo clusters tend to lie within 30 kiloparsecs (100 thousand light years). Additionally, the young clusters don’t appear to be rotating with the disk of the galaxy whereas the old halo slowly orbits in the same direction as the disk.

In looking more carefully at the positions of these satellites, the team, led by Stefan Keller at the Australian National University, found that the younger population tends to lie in a wide plane that is tilted from the rotational axis of our galaxy by a mere 8°.

This plane is strikingly similar to another recognized grouping of objects: Many of the known dwarf galaxies lie in a nearly identical plane, known as the Plane of Satellites (PoS). This finding suggests that this population of is a relic of cannibalized galaxies. Even more interesting is that, while these objects are younger than the distinctly “old” population, there is still a large variation in their ages. This implies that this plane wasn’t created by the accretion of one, or even a few minor galaxies, but a consistent feeding of small galaxies onto the Milky Way for much of the history of the universe, and all from the same direction. Studies of the distribution of satellites around our nearest major neighbor, M31, the Andromeda galaxy, has turned up a similar preferred plane, tilted some 59° from its disk.

One explanation for this is that this is a preferred direction that traces invisible filaments of . While dark matter distributions are difficult to predict, models haven’t accounted for such strong filamentary structure on such small scales. Rather, in the neighborhood of our galaxy, the overall distribution is described as an oblate spheroid. One of the reasons astronomers believe our own dark matter halo is so nicely shaped is the way it is affecting the Sagittarius dwarf galaxy which is slowly being accreted onto our own. If the dark matter were more wispy, it should be stretched out in different manners.

Another possibility the authors consider is that the objects were created in a preferred plane “from the break up of a large progenitor at early times”. In other words, the filament could be a fossil of larger structure before our galaxy formed along which these dwarf galaxies formed and from which these could have been slowly accreting over the history of the galaxy.

Explore further

Antennae Galaxies

Source: Universe Today
Citation: Globular clusters on a plane (2011, September 23) retrieved 19 October 2019 from
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.

Feedback to editors

User comments

Sep 23, 2011
Sounds reasonable to me.

Plus if dark matter is 5 times more massive than regular matter, shouldn't it form structures similar to cosmic filaments except on a much smaller scale?

Sep 26, 2011
I'll give credit to the article that when positing conjecture, it does so clearly rather than just state an assumption as fact. That's a nice change from the norm, compared to much of published scientific "news".

That said, this article would have done well to mention the hypothetical "Electric Universe" explanations, since there is arguably considerably more hard evidence for EU phenomena than for "...invisible filaments of dark matter."

Not a bad article by any means, but incomplete in terms of an evenhanded review of reasonable and sound competing explanations.

Sep 26, 2011
I termed it "conjecture" because of their use of such phrases as "One explanation for this...", "...are difficult to predict, models havent accounted...", "One of the reasons astronomers believe..."

I don't deny that (most, maybe darn near all) astronomers believe in Dark Matter... I'm just pleased (i.e. I'll take what i can get) that the article was not written as if such-and-such was definitive proof, or that it was a known fact.

Given the state, stance, and tone of much "science reporting" these days, I find that a refreshing change.

Not "hope inspiring", mind you, just refreshing.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more