Falling satellite slows down, Earth strike delayed

September 23, 2011 By MARCIA DUNN , AP Aerospace Writer
In this file image provided by NASA this is the STS-48 onboard photo of the Upper Atmosphere Research Satellite (UARS) in the grasp of the RMS (Remote Manipulator System) during deployment, from the shuttle in September 1991. NASA's old research satellite is expected to come crashing down through the atmosphere Friday afternoon, Sept. 23, 2011 Eastern Time. The spacecraft will not be passing over North America then, the space agency said in a statement Wednesday evening. (AP Photo/NASA)

A dead 6-ton satellite baffled NASA experts Friday by slowing its descent toward Earth and delaying its ultimate crash until the early part of the weekend.

The space agency is now predicting the will crash down to Earth late Friday or early Saturday, Eastern Time. Increased had been causing the atmosphere to expand and the satellite to fall more quickly, but that's no longer such a major factor, experts said. What's more, the orientation of the satellite apparently has changed in orbit, and that's slowing its fatal plunge.

Friday morning, cautioned there is now a slim chance any surviving debris will land in the United States. Earlier this week, NASA said North America would be in the clear and that the satellite would strike somewhere Friday afternoon.

"It is still too early to predict the time and location of re-entry with any certainty," NASA said in a statement.

The Aerospace Corp., based in California, is estimating the strike sometime between about 6 p.m. and 4 a.m. EDT, which would make a huge difference in where the debris might wind up. Those late-night, early-morning passes show the satellite flying over parts of the United States.

Any surviving wreckage is expected to be limited to a 500-mile swath.

The Upper Atmosphere Research Satellite, or UARS, will be the biggest to crash back to Earth, uncontrolled, since the post-Apollo 75-ton Skylab and the more than 10-ton Pegasus 2 satellite, both in 1979.

Russia's 135-ton Mir space station slammed through the atmosphere in 2001, but it was a controlled dive into the Pacific.

Most of the UARS satellite will disintegrate, but 26 pieces - representing 1,200 pounds of heavy metal - are expected to rain down somewhere. The biggest surviving chunk should be no more than 300 pounds.

Chances are the wreckage will slam into the ocean; nearly three-quarter of the Earth is covered in water.

In any event, no one has ever been hurt by falling space junk to anyone's knowledge, and there has been no serious property damage. NASA put the chances that somebody somewhere on will get hurt at 1-in-3,200. But any one person's odds of being struck have been estimated at 1-in-22 trillion, given there are 7 billion people on the planet.

UARS was launched in 1991 from space shuttle Discovery to study the atmosphere and the ozone layer. NASA shut it down in 2005 after lowering its orbit to hurry its demise. With a satellite-retrieval mission ruled out following the 2003 Columbia disaster, NASA did not want the satellite hanging around orbit posing a debris hazard.

Space junk is a growing problem in low-Earth orbit. More than 20,000 pieces of debris, at least 4 inches in diameter, are being tracked on a daily basis. These objects pose a serious threat to the International Space Station.

Explore further: NASA satellite to crash into Earth Friday

More information: Satellite updates: http://www.nasa.gov/uars

Aerospace Corp: http://reentrynews.aero.org/1991063b.html


Related Stories

NASA satellite to crash into Earth Friday

September 23, 2011

A six-ton satellite hurtled toward Earth on Friday, and NASA admitted it had little idea where the biggest piece of US space junk in 30 years will crash into the planet.

NASA says satellite will hit Earth Sept 23 US time

September 21, 2011

The US space agency has narrowed down its prediction of when a defunct six-ton satellite will crash back to Earth, saying on Wednesday that it is expected to land on September 23, US time.

NASA refines satellite crash course, a bit

September 22, 2011

NASA on Thursday refined the crash course of a six-ton defunct satellite, saying it is likely to miss North America, though its exact landing spot remains unknown.

Recommended for you

Meteorite source in asteroid belt not a single debris field

February 17, 2019

A new study published online in Meteoritics and Planetary Science finds that our most common meteorites, those known as L chondrites, come from at least two different debris fields in the asteroid belt. The belt contains ...

Diagnosing 'art acne' in Georgia O'Keeffe's paintings

February 17, 2019

Even Georgia O'Keeffe noticed the pin-sized blisters bubbling on the surface of her paintings. For decades, conservationists and scholars assumed these tiny protrusions were grains of sand, kicked up from the New Mexico desert ...

Archaeologists discover Incan tomb in Peru

February 16, 2019

Peruvian archaeologists discovered an Incan tomb in the north of the country where an elite member of the pre-Columbian empire was buried, one of the investigators announced Friday.

Where is the universe hiding its missing mass?

February 15, 2019

Astronomers have spent decades looking for something that sounds like it would be hard to miss: about a third of the "normal" matter in the Universe. New results from NASA's Chandra X-ray Observatory may have helped them ...

What rising seas mean for local economies

February 15, 2019

Impacts from climate change are not always easy to see. But for many local businesses in coastal communities across the United States, the evidence is right outside their doors—or in their parking lots.


Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

1.7 / 5 (6) Sep 23, 2011
i won my bet that nasa would change its prediction and correct itself . booooya!
2.3 / 5 (6) Sep 23, 2011
Thanks for the update.

It's very difficult, or impossible, to predict dynamic processes with so many variables.

With kind regards,
Oliver K. Manuel
1 / 5 (4) Sep 23, 2011
couldn't they just use HARP to punch up the atmosphere in its flight path to help it come down before it starts orbiting over the west coast?
not rated yet Sep 23, 2011
Let us hope and pray that no serious problem will occur when this satellite reach the earth. Let us expect that it will land or fall in a deserted area where no life or property will be greatly damaged.

5 / 5 (4) Sep 23, 2011
"The biggest surviving chunk should be no more than 300 pounds." whew! so comforting to know that. :)
3.7 / 5 (3) Sep 23, 2011
Are you sure this isn't a UPS or an ATT satellite?" The delivery schedule has about the same time range 10 hours or so - between 6PM and 4AM?
1 / 5 (3) Sep 23, 2011
"The biggest surviving chunk should be no more than 300 pounds." whew! so comforting to know that. :)

Can't wait to see the crater! 300 lbs at a few thousand miles per hour..!
1 / 5 (1) Sep 23, 2011
Can't wait to see the crater! 300 lbs at a few thousand miles per hour..!

Negative. The object will be traveling at terminal velocity, nowhere near orbital speeds.

Are you sure about that? It's hard to imagine it slowing down that much in the short time it'll be in the atmosphere.
3.4 / 5 (5) Sep 24, 2011
Are you sure about that?
If it is only a few hundred pounds then I have to agree with Posterus. Unless it somehow a low resistance shape. Remember that it is not hitting the atmosphere at the much higher speed of meteors in the first place, and it will start coming down a rather shallow angle thus slowing down quite a lot as it breaks up in the upper atmosphere.

not rated yet Sep 24, 2011
You'll be glad to know I survived! :-)
1.7 / 5 (6) Sep 24, 2011
Can't wait to see the crater! 300 lbs at a few thousand miles per hour..!

Negative. The object will be traveling at terminal velocity, nowhere near orbital speeds.

I know that. Terminal velocity depends on the air resistance, which depends on the final object shape in the thicker part of the lower atmosphere. It can't be ruled out that some portions of the object will be oriented/melted/burned away for a more streamlined shape with much less air resistance, while retaining much of its orbital speed. That's I believe is the basis for tungsten (and the like) "telephone poles" orbital kinetic bombardment weapon proposals...
not rated yet Sep 25, 2011
Why wouldn't it "slow down(headline)"? That's what falling from orbit means, since a lower, stable orbit requires it to go faster. Besides, it obviously encounters more drag as it descends. This was a non-article/no-brainer. OF COURSE NASA can't predict how something like this will break up and change its aerodynamics on the way down. Why do you think reentry vehicles are symmetrical and streamlined?

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.