US fears individuals at risk after WikiLeaks dump

August 31, 2011 by Lachlan Carmichael
Photo illustration. The latest WikiLeaks dump of 133,887 confidential and secret documents included many containing the names of sensitive sources who could be at risk of reprisals if they were known to be talking to US diplomats.

The United States voiced renewed concern over the risks to individuals after the anti-secrecy site WikiLeaks made public more US diplomatic cables, many of which contained the names of sensitive sources.

State Department spokeswoman Victoria Nuland would not confirm the of the latest documents, but said "the United States strongly condemns any illegal disclosure of .

"In addition to damaging our diplomatic efforts, it puts individuals' security at risk, threatens our national security and undermines our effort to work with countries to solve shared problems," Nuland told reporters.

"We remain concerned about these illegal disclosures and about concerns and risks to individuals," she said.

"We continue to carefully monitor what becomes public and to take steps to mitigate the damage to national security and to assist those who may be harmed by these illegal disclosures to the extent that we can," Nuland said.

Nuland was alluding to a policy that experts said involved US efforts to come to the aid of sources who ran the risk of being exposed, including possibly relocating them.

The New York Times reported that the latest dump of 133,887 confidential and secret documents included many containing the names of sensitive sources who could be at risk of reprisals if they were known to be talking to US diplomats.

Meanwhile in Australia officials were lambasting the whistle-blowing site for its "incredibly irresponsible" move to publish secret US cables that detailed Australians with suspected links to Yemeni terrorism.

Australia's Attorney-General Robert McClelland also noted contrary to previous efforts to redact identifying features, this "has not occurred in this case".

In a Twitter message the anti-secrecy website said only that it was "totally false that any sources have been exposed or will be exposed".

However, in sampling half a dozen cables written between 2003 and 2009 where the author wrote "protect source," AFP observed that only one of them had the name of the source removed.

WikiLeaks meanwhile also said late Tuesday it was fending off a cyberattack after being lambasted for releasing more supposedly confidential US diplomatic cables.

" is presently under cyberattack," the organization said in a terse message on microblogging service Twitter.

After WikiLeaks obtained around 250,000 cables and released the first batch of them in November last year, the US State Department has been exposed to embarrassing revelations about how it viewed foreign government officials.

Diplomats worried the disclosures would make it harder to do their work because officials, representatives of non-government organizations, activists and others would hesitate to talk to them privately for fear of being exposed.

However, experts said WikiLeaks was much more careful about editing out the names of US government sources in the first batch of released documents.

That is not the case in the latest batch, according to Steven Aftergood, a specialist on government at the Federation of American Scientists who reviewed dozens of cables and found only one case where the source was removed.

"It's a worrisome development particularly because a number of the confidential sources are not public officials but are private contacts, members of NGOs, or private firms," Aftergood told AFP.

"And in several cases, the themselves have specified that the sources need to be protected," he said.

He said the consequences for the sources range from losing the confidence of the people they usually deal with to actually losing their jobs. "In some extreme cases," he added, they may be in "personal jeopardy."

"The point is that they (WikiLeaks) have changed their practice and that the kinds of information that they were redacting as recently as a few months ago is now being put out in the open," Aftergood said.

For former spokesman Philip Crowley, the problem with the leaks was not about embarrassing revelations as much as "about the risk to lives and careers of individuals" who have helped US diplomats understand events.

Crowley, who now has a prestigious university teaching post in Pennsylvania, said he does not know if WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange is right in saying that nobody has died from a WikiLeaks disclosure.

"That's not the only measure. There have been people forced to move, people who have lost their careers, people who simply are much more cautious," he said.

Explore further: WikiLeaks site comes under attack

Related Stories

WikiLeaks site comes under attack

August 31, 2011

(AP) -- The WikiLeaks website crashed Tuesday in an apparent cyberattack after the accelerated publication of tens of thousands of once-secret State Department cables by the anti-secrecy organization raised new concerns ...

WikiLeaks to defy US demands on leaked cables

November 28, 2010

(AP) -- The online website WikiLeaks says it will go ahead with the release of hundreds of thousands of classified State Department documents in defiance of U.S. demands not to publish the files.

US did not seek WikiLeaks cutoff: Clinton

February 15, 2011

The United States did not pressure private companies to deny service to WikiLeaks following its release of secret US diplomatic cables, US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton said Tuesday.

US soldier arrested in WikiLeaks case

June 7, 2010

A US soldier in Iraq has been arrested for allegedly leaking classified information to whistleblower website WikiLeaks, including video of a helicopter strike in Baghdad and US diplomatic cables.

Recommended for you

A not-quite-random walk demystifies the algorithm

December 15, 2017

The algorithm is having a cultural moment. Originally a math and computer science term, algorithms are now used to account for everything from military drone strikes and financial market forecasts to Google search results.

US faces moment of truth on 'net neutrality'

December 14, 2017

The acrimonious battle over "net neutrality" in America comes to a head Thursday with a US agency set to vote to roll back rules enacted two years earlier aimed at preventing a "two-speed" internet.

FCC votes along party lines to end 'net neutrality' (Update)

December 14, 2017

The Federal Communications Commission repealed the Obama-era "net neutrality" rules Thursday, giving internet service providers like Verizon, Comcast and AT&T a free hand to slow or block websites and apps as they see fit ...

The wet road to fast and stable batteries

December 14, 2017

An international team of scientists—including several researchers from the U.S. Department of Energy's (DOE) Argonne National Laboratory—has discovered an anode battery material with superfast charging and stable operation ...


Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.