Study: Union decline accounts for much of the rise in wage inequality

July 26, 2011

Union membership in America has declined significantly since the early 1970s, and that plunge explains approximately a fifth of the increase in hourly wage inequality among women and about a third among men, according to a new study in the August issue of the American Sociological Review.

"Our study underscores the role of unions as an equalizing force in the labor market," said study author Bruce Western, a professor of sociology at Harvard University. "Most researchers studying wage inequality have focused on the effects of educational —pay differences based on level of education—and have generally under-emphasized the impact of unions."

From 1973 to 2007, wage inequality in the private sector increased by more than 40 percent among men, and by about 50 percent among women. In their study, Western and co-author Jake Rosenfeld, a professor of sociology at the University of Washington, examine the effects of union decline on both between-group inequality and within-group inequality. Between-group compares people from different demographics and industries, while within-group looks at people from the same demographics and industries.

Focusing on full-time, private sector workers, Western and Rosenfeld find that deunionization—the decline in the percentage of the labor force that is unionized—and educational stratification each explain about 33 percent of the rise in within-group wage inequality among men. Among women, deunionization explains about 20 percent of the increase in wage inequality, whereas education explains more than 40 percent.

Part of the reason for this gender discrepancy is that men have experienced a much larger decline in private sector union membership—from 34 percent in 1973 to 8 percent in 2007—than women (who went from 16 percent to 6 percent during the same period).

"For generations, unions were the core institution advocating for more equitable wage distribution," said Rosenfeld. "Today, when unions—at least in the —have largely disappeared, that means that this voice for equity has faded dramatically. People now have very different ideas about what's acceptable in terms of pay distribution."

Interestingly, the study finds that union decline explains little of the rise in between-group inequality.

"Unions standardize wages so that people with similar characteristics—if they're union members—tend to have similar wages," Western said. "So, it makes sense that deunionization has little impact on between-group inequality, which, by definition, exists between groups of people that are different."

While the purpose of unions is to standardize wages for their members, Western and Rosenfeld find that even nonunion workers, if they're in highly unionized industries, tend to have fairly equal wages, partly because nonunion employers will raise wages to the union level to discourage unionization.

In terms of policy implications, Western and Rosenfeld think their study could help reignite the dialogue on labor unions, which they believe has disappeared from economic debates in recent years.

"In the early 1970s, were important for delivering middle class incomes to working class families, and they enlivened politics by speaking out against inequality," said Western. "These days, there just aren't big institutional actors who are making the case for greater economic equality in America."

The study relies on data from the Current Population Survey (CPS) from 1973 to 2007. A monthly survey conducted by the Bureau of Census, the CPS provides data from about 60,000 U.S. households representative of the U.S. population as a whole.

Explore further: Changes in work force, not pay, narrowing the gender wage gap

Related Stories

Changes in work force, not pay, narrowing the gender wage gap

August 12, 2008

The apparent narrowing of the wage gap between working men and women in the last 30 years reflects changes in the type of women in the workforce, rather than in how much they're being paid, according to groundbreaking new ...

Unions make both members and nonmembers happier

November 5, 2010

It’s no coincidence that American workers have never been more dissatisfied with their jobs, and labor unions’ membership keeps dropping, according to a new study co-authored by University of Notre Dame political ...

Recommended for you

New paper answers causation conundrum

November 17, 2017

In a new paper published in a special issue of the Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A, SFI Professor Jessica Flack offers a practical answer to one of the most significant, and most confused questions in evolutionary ...

Chance discovery of forgotten 1960s 'preprint' experiment

November 16, 2017

For years, scientists have complained that it can take months or even years for a scientific discovery to be published, because of the slowness of peer review. To cut through this problem, researchers in physics and mathematics ...


Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

2.3 / 5 (6) Jul 26, 2011
"For generations, unions were the core institution advocating for more equitable wage distribution,"

This comment shows the bias of the researcher. Unions, in attempts to unionize a company, always tell workers that union membership will increase the wages of workers, not make their wages "more equitable." I've never seen a union say their member's pay was too high.
1.8 / 5 (6) Jul 26, 2011
In terms of policy implications, Western and Rosenfeld think their study could help reignite the dialogue on labor unions, which they believe has disappeared from economic debates in recent years.

Another blatant advertisement for unionization.

As to the stated premise of the article, unions often negotiate lower pay and benefits to newer workers to preserve the pay and benefits of older union workers. This is unions directly demanding wage inequality.

Just an advertisement and a poor one at that.
3 / 5 (2) Jul 27, 2011
Most are familiar with "AARP" -- American Assoc. of Retired Persons" which (I think, but am not sure) represents approx. 10 million persons over 50 years old. What we need is "NAMCAP" -- National Assoc. of Middle Class American Persons." Can you imagine the clout such an organization would have if, say, there were 10, 20, 30 million persons who paid just $10.00 a year dues! Of course, this supposes an organization leadership that was honest, ethical, and 100 percent dedicated to advancing the interests of the "Peons" (i.e., the Working Class) in Amercia. What do you think?
1.8 / 5 (5) Jul 27, 2011

An NAMCAP would undoubtedly wield considerable power if it could attract sufficient members. It would probably need to actually serve its members, which AARP has managed to avoid.
not rated yet Jul 28, 2011
Dogbert: AARP has saved my wife and I thousands upon thousands of dollars in medical, vehicle, and homeowner's insurance over the years. But, yes, I agree, AARP needs to be more "adversarial" in dealing with our "leaders" in La La Land! My estimate is that it would take 5 years for membership in an organization representing "the middle class" to reach 10 - 15 million. My friends, my feeling is that the "natives" are very restless, disgusted, and discouraged. I envision NAMCAP to be adversarial in the extreme, even more so than, say, The Center for Biological Diversity is regarding environmental issues. Why? Simply because those in La La Land (both Repos and Demos) represent ONLY big business, big wall street, and the very wealthy -- and no one else.
1 / 5 (3) Jul 28, 2011

Sorry. Did not mean to ruffle any feathers. The AARP does promote several AARP branded insurance policies and Medicare supplement policies. The AARP is not actually selling those policies, the policies are underwritten by major insurance companies and equivalent policies can be found without the AARP branding.

I was referring to AARP's political activities which are often opposed to the best interest of the elderly. For example, for years the AARP has lobbied for reduced funding for nursing home care. Since many elderly eventually require nursing home care, the AARP is not serving their expressed group. Of course, when their members actually need nursing home care, they usually are not dues paying members ...

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.