Turkish nuclear plans on Mediterranean raise fears

April 2, 2011 By SELCAN HACAOGLU , Associated Press
Greek Cypriot and Turkish Cypriot environmental activists protest against Turkey's plans to build a nuclear power plant on its southern coast near a seismic fault line, during a demonstration in the divided island's capital Nicosia, in this file photo dated Saturday, March 19, 2011. Turkey is pushing ahead on building a nuclear power plant close to an earthquake-prone Ecemis Fault area on the Mediterranean coast, dismissing fears from neighboring Greek Prime Minister George Papandreou who claims that Japan's nuclear disaster is a warning of the risks to the whole region.(AP Photo/Philippos Christou)

(AP) -- Turkey plans to build a coastal nuclear power plant close to an earthquake-prone area, dismissing neighbors' fears that Japan's nuclear disaster shows that the new plant could be a risk to the whole Mediterranean region.

Greece and Cyprus say the move is a gamble that could cause catastrophe and want the European Union to scrutinize the EU candidate's plan in a debate fraught with political and historical baggage. Turkish officials insist the plant is safe and necessary to keep the country's strong economy going.

The EU is reassessing the whole 27-nation bloc's energy policy and questioning the role of nuclear power on a continent where no one can forget that Ukraine's 1986 Chernobyl disaster spewed radiation for thousands of miles (kilometers).

But Turkey is standing firmly by plans to build three nuclear power plants in the years ahead - including one at Akkuyu on the , close to the Ecemis Fault, which an expert says could possibly generate a magnitude-7 quake.

Greece is staunchly opposed to the plant - calling out its historic rival at an EU summit at which the bloc agreed to checks on its 143 reactors.

"Nuclear power for us is not an option because we are in a highly seismically active region," Greek Prime Minister George Papandreou said in Brussels last week. "The EU will ask for stress tests to be carried out at existing and planned facilities in neighboring countries - and we stressed the fact that Turkey is planning to build a nuclear site at Akkuyu."

France has several plants not far from the Mediterranean, Turkey's neighbors Armenia and Bulgaria already have them, and several countries around the sea have announced ambitions to build ones. Turkey's plan, however, is drawing particular attention because of its temblors.

Akkuyu is 60 miles (100 kilometers) north of the island of Cyprus, which has been divided between ethnic Greeks and Turks since 1974, when Turkey invaded. Turkey says the 1,200-megawatt Russian pressurized water reactor, the VVER-1200 - a new model yet to be operated anywhere in the world - will be quake-proof and meets the highest nuclear safety standards.

Turkey has already signed a deal with Russia's Rosatom agency for the plant's construction, which has yet to begin, and hopes the completed facility will start producing electricity in seven years.

"We are in an effort to realize everything in a plan with all security measures," Prime Minister Tayyip Recep Erdogan said. "Turkey is becoming more powerful in industry and technology day by day. It is obvious that it will be in great need of power."

Erdogan has repeatedly downplayed risks at nuclear power plants since a magnitude-9 quake off Japan's northeastern coast triggered a March 11 tsunami that crippled the cooling systems of the Fukushima Dai-ichi nuclear plant. The plant has been spewing radioactivity ever since and officials admitted Saturday that highly radioactive water was leaking into the sea.

Erdogan says all investments have risks. "In that case, let's not bring gas canisters to our homes, let's not install natural gas, let's not stream crude oil through our country," he said a few days after the Fukushima accident.

"I wonder whether those who oppose nuclear energy do not use computers or watch television because of the radiation risk?" he added.

So far no country has reached a conclusion on the safety requirements for nuclear plants following the Fukushima accident, according to Mujid S. Kazimi, director of the Center for Advanced Nuclear Energy Systems at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

"But the lesson from Fukushima is not only to withstand strong earthquakes, but also to prevent loss of electric power systems needed for decay heat removal," Kazimi said in an email. "What is more important is to ensure that the complete loss of electric power will be avoided under the most severe expected external events."

Turkish Energy Minister Taner Yildiz says the high-end technology used in the construction of the Akkuyu plant will make it safer than Fukushima, which began operating in 1971. At Fukushima, nuclear engineers scrambled to prevent a total and simultaneous reactor meltdown at three reactors while dealing with overheating fuel rods in a damaged storage pool at a fourth reactor.

"I would not say 'yes' to anything that I was not comfortable about," Yildiz said.

But many in Turkey remember how Chernobyl contamination hurt the vital export of tea and hazelnuts and forced Turkish leaders to assure a worried public, drinking cups of tea daily in front of cameras to show it was not contaminated.

The nuclear standoff comes against a background of territorial disputes between Greece and Turkey, including in Cyprus. Activists have protested Turkey's nuclear plans at home and in Cyprus. Hundreds of protesters have marched in Istanbul, holding banners that read: "Don't let Akkuyu become Fukushima."

Greek President Karolos Papoulias joined the chorus last week, saying "the irrational insistence of Turkey to build a nuclear plant in a highly seismic region" endangers the safety of everyone in the region and "must be answered directly."

Cyprus President Dimitris Christofias said Cyprus, Greece and other southern European countries have raised the issue at the European Council.

"Mr. Erdogan must strictly get the message that earthquake-prone areas are not in the least appropriate to develop such projects," Christofias said.

But, fears of a strong earthquake near the may be exaggerated, one expert said.

"It is possible, but with low probability," said professor Mustafa Erdik of the Istanbul-based Kandilli Quake Research Institute and Observatory, who has studied the fault line near the plant. "I don't think there will be any problem regarding the location and quake-design of the nuclear plant."

Erdik said, however, there was need for further scientific study since he last examined the site in 1987.

"Ecemis is an active fault zone. Its southward extension and distance from site is disputed and needs further evaluation," Erdik said. "It could possibly generate a magnitude-7 earthquake."

Turkey is also holding talks with Japanese companies for a second plant near the Black Sea coastal town of Sinop, 50 miles (80 kilometers) north of the North Anatolian Fault, which generated two powerful earthquakes that killed 18,000 people in western Turkey in 1999. Activists have also protested the selection of Sinop but with no immediate progress in that project, the spotlight is focused on Akkuyu.

Erdik said there was also "uncertainty" about the seismic activity near the proposed Sinop site.

Turkey has not disclosed the possible location of the third nuclear plant yet.

Explore further: IAEA warned Japan over nuclear quake risk: WikiLeaks


Related Stories

IAEA warned Japan over nuclear quake risk: WikiLeaks

March 17, 2011

The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) warned Japan two years ago that a strong earthquake could pose a "serious problem" for its nuclear power stations, Britain's Daily Telegraph reported.

EU fixes post-Japan nuclear safety overhaul

March 25, 2011

European leaders resolved Friday to revisit safety at nuclear reactors as emergency workers in Japan suffered radiation burns and rising global fears of food contamination hit home.

Japan nuclear plant firm opens Twitter account

March 17, 2011

Tokyo Electric Power Co. (TEPCO), which operates the quake-hit Japanese nuclear reactors, opened an official Twitter account late Thursday, immediately drawing more than 117,000 followers.

US experts unsure about Fukushima situation

March 28, 2011

US experts have expressed uncertainty about the seriousness of the situation at Japan's Fukushima nuclear complex, steering clear of speculation whether the core of one of the reactors there had been damaged.

US West Coast: on frontline from nuclear cloud?

March 14, 2011

California is closely watching the crisis at a Japanese nuclear plant, but officials downplayed the threat that a radioactive cloud blown across the Pacific could pose for the US West Coast.

Recommended for you

Researchers pin down one source of a potent greenhouse gas

November 20, 2017

A study of a Lake Erie wetland suggests that scientists have vastly underestimated the number of places methane-producing microbes can survive—and, as a result, today's global climate models may be misjudging the amount ...

Clay mineral waters Earth's mantle from the inside

November 20, 2017

The first observation of a super-hydrated phase of the clay mineral kaolinite could improve our understanding of processes that lead to volcanism and affect earthquakes. In high-pressure and high-temperature X-ray measurements ...


Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

4.5 / 5 (2) Apr 03, 2011
Really, more 50's technology reactors? How about building some fast neutron reactors that don't need power to shut themselves down, extracts the 99% of energy contained in the fuel that LWR designs set aside as "waste", oh, and doesn't produce the nasty uranium/plutonium and actinides as waste *TO BEGIN WITH*, so no cooling pools filled with old fuel rods with no where to go.

Oh that is right, they are considered "experimental" because the one we built, before even Chernobyl had it's meltdown, became political fodder and we closed the door on replacing these antique designs for reactors.

And when it comes to pass that these obviously unsafe reactor designs are shown to be unsafe. And the people who blocked building their replacements so we had to keep them around then point and say "see, they are unsafe!" Thanks for nothing.
5 / 5 (1) Apr 03, 2011
Doh, Guess a link might be nice.

5 / 5 (1) Apr 03, 2011
Most of Japan's reactors shut down fine, as did those at Fukushima even in a massive 8.9 magnitude earthquake, the forth or fifth largest ever recorded.
What caused the problems was a 7 meter high tsunami ripping the diesel generators loose which have to provide power to pump the water needed for cooling residual heat.
The batteries apparently then did their job fine, but only had enough power to do so for around 8 hours.
So reactor designs seem to have been thoroughly tested for earthquake resistance, and passed with flying colours.

Tsunami resistance will now have to be improved, but these were 40 year old reactors and modern designs rely much more on passive safety, ie they don't rely so much on pumping water about.
We now also have technology like submersible lithium batteries, which could provide power for 30 days at a cost of perhaps $2 million per plant, and would not care if they were covered in seawater.

not rated yet Apr 03, 2011
Lots of good designs around. Stop the scare tactics! You can pump water with diesels, too, and start the diesels with compressed air, and feed them air from snorkels. Earthquakes are not much of an engineering problem.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.