Mass illegal immigration violations reveals flaws in the law

February 9, 2011, Washington University in St. Louis

Anyone who cares about the rule of law has to acknowledge that illegal immigration has serious social costs that cannot be casually dismissed, says immigration law expert Stephen Legomsky, JD, DPhil, the John S. Lehmann University Professor at Washington University in St. Louis School of Law.

Too often, however, those costs are caricatured, undocumented demonized, and the human realities ignored,” he says.

Legomsky says there is no credible evidence that undocumented immigrants take more jobs than they create, or that they constitute a net national fiscal drain — although they can adversely affect the budgets of selected states. Nor is there any evidence that they increase the national crime rate.

“It’s true,” he adds, “that when millions of individuals violate any law — whether it’s immigration, taxes or exceeding the posted speed limit — the rule of law takes a hit. But sometimes, mass violations reveal flaws in the law itself.

“At any rate, the rule of law also means that the penalties should not be disproportionate to the wrongdoing.”

Legomsky is the author of Immigration and Refugee Law and Policy, which has been adopted as the required text for immigration courses at 175 U.S. law schools since its initial publication in 1992.

He has testified before Congress on several occasions and has been a consultant to President Clinton's transition team, President Obama’s transition team, the first President Bush’s Commissioner of Immigration, the Administrative Conference of the United States, the UN High Commissioner for Refugees, and several foreign governments on migration, refugee and citizenship issues.

‘Crucial step’

On the enforcement side, Legomsky believes that employer sanctions could be effective if Congress is willing to invest the resources needed to make the national database, known as E-Verify, reliable and keep it up to date.

“The current high error rate is unacceptable and makes optimum use of employer sanctions nearly impossible,” he says.

To further reduce the incentive for , Legomsky believes the U.S. government should expand the opportunities for legal immigration by family members of U.S. citizens and lawful permanent residents and by those whose occupational skills benefit the U.S. economy.

“A generous legalization program for most of the approximately 11 million undocumented immigrants already present seems unlikely in the current political climate. But it too is a crucial step if we want to integrate a population that is here to stay, enable these hard-working individuals to contribute more fully, and open life opportunities for their children,” he says.

“At the very least, Congress should pass the DREAM Act, which would enable young people whose parents brought them to the United States at an early age, and who want to attend college or join the U.S. armed forces, to come out of the shadows and function productively as lawful permanent residents,” Legomsky says.

“Whatever one’s views of the parents’ actions — and despite popular perceptions, the parents do pay taxes like anyone else — their children are morally innocent by any standard.

“To crush their educational dreams because their parents broke a crosses the line that separates ‘tough’ from ‘cruel.’”

Explore further: Gender has no place in the legal definition of parenthood, says family law expert

Related Stories

Bodies for sale

December 22, 2010

For some people, intellectual property is about faster computers and better apps. But for Kara Swanson, a new professor at the Northeastern University School of Law, it’s about body products — literally.

Modern society made up of all types

November 4, 2010

Modern society has an intense interest in classifying people into ‘types’, according to a University of Melbourne Cultural Historian, leading to potentially catastrophic life-changing outcomes for those typed – ...

Recommended for you

Crowds within crowd found to outperform 'wisdom of the crowd'

January 18, 2018

A team of researchers affiliated with institutions in Argentina, the U.S. and Germany has found that there is a way to improve on the "wisdom of the crowd"—separate the people in a given crowd into smaller groups and let ...


Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

not rated yet Feb 09, 2011
Wow, he almost sounds like an open borders kind of guy.
not rated yet Feb 09, 2011
Of course illegal aliens take jobs from those can legally work in the USA.
The law needs to be enforced or changed.
If the USA wanted to boost economic growth, it would essentially open the borders to ALL who want to come to the USA to work or start a business. (I hear there are a lot of cheap houses available in Detroit.)
Such a change in the law would allow enable Indians, Filipinos, Chinese, Europeans who speak English to immigrate and jump start the US economy. I suggest a few restrictions, but if the US enacted such a policy, many foreign countries would be quite concerned they would be loosing their most energetic and productive citizens.
5 / 5 (1) Feb 10, 2011

Mandatory jail time for employers that knowingly employ illegals. End birthright citizenship. Secure the border, and don't interfere with states (Arizona) that are doing the job the federal government won't do. No incentives for illegals and no DREAM act. That's a parental responsibility. Continue orderly immigration in sectors where there are labor shortages and no immigration from hostile nations.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.