New report calls for family-security insurance

New report calls for family-security insurance

(PhysOrg.com) -- Researchers at Berkeley Law and Georgetown Law have released a blueprint for a national insurance program -- which would replace wages when people need to take time off for health and care-giving. The report says this need is no longer an issue for individual families or select industries, but a national priority with major social and economic implications.

Berkeley and Georgetown Law have released a report that provides a blueprint for establishing and financing a new national insurance program that would replace wages when people need to take time off for health and care-giving needs.

The report, by the Berkeley Center on Health, Economic & Family Security (Berkeley CHEFS) and Georgetown Law’s Workplace Flexibility 2010, is called “Family Security Insurance: A New Foundation for Economic Security” and is available here.

Based on a substantive review of current data, law, and policy, the report outlines a nearly universal need among working Americans for time off from work to address personal illness, care for a new child, or care for a loved one with a serious illness. It asserts that this need is no longer an issue for individual families or select industries, but a national priority with major social and economic implications.

“The report describes how Family Security Insurance would fundamentally reform social policy to address workers’ critical needs,” said Berkeley CHEFS Executive Director Ann O’Leary ’05. “At the same time, it would spread the cost fairly, protect the deficit, and keep people working.”

O’Leary co-authored the report with Berkeley Law Professors Stephen Sugarman and Gillian Lester, Berkeley CHEFS Counsel Angela Clements '09, and members of the Georgetown Law faculty. On December 2 at the National Press Club in Washington, D.C., O’Leary, Sugarman, and Lester helped launch the report by appearing on a panel with two Georgetown colleagues to discuss the proposal’s key items.

Family Security Insurance would reform the current social insurance system to provide for income replacement when people take time off from work for health and care-giving reasons. The report outlines the benefits that would be provided, who would be eligible, how the program would be administered, and how to fund it.

The recommendations cover income replacement for three important life events: one’s own serious illness or temporary disability that renders a worker temporarily unable to perform his or her job; arrival of a child who needs care and time to bond with parents; and the serious illness of a family member who needs care.

Family Security Insurance would be a national social insurance program not paid for by the government, but by spreading the cost among workers and their employers to create a fair, predictable foundation of support.

“Spreading the costs between employers and employees is fair because both will benefit from Family Security Insurance,” said Sugarman. “Employers will be more able to retain good workers and employees will receive a basic level of economic security when they need to be temporarily away from the workforce. Having employers and employees pay for Family Security Insurance will also ensure that it's not a government funded welfare program that would add to the national deficit.”


Explore further

Proposed Social Security benefit cuts won't reduce deficit, expert says

More information: www.law.berkeley.edu/files/che … e_2010_Final_web.pdf
Citation: New report calls for family-security insurance (2010, December 6) retrieved 21 July 2019 from https://phys.org/news/2010-12-family-security.html
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.
0 shares

Feedback to editors

User comments

Dec 06, 2010
Oh, goody. Another monstrous entitlement with costs to be mandated by the nanny state. When we're in a hole, depend on the left to bring in the heavy digging equipment.

Dec 07, 2010
Supported by Maria Shriver and also the Center For American Progress no less... http://www.law.be...6606.htm

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more