New report calls for family-security insurance

December 6, 2010 By Andrew Cohen

( -- Researchers at Berkeley Law and Georgetown Law have released a blueprint for a national insurance program -- which would replace wages when people need to take time off for health and care-giving. The report says this need is no longer an issue for individual families or select industries, but a national priority with major social and economic implications.

Berkeley and Georgetown Law have released a report that provides a blueprint for establishing and financing a new national insurance program that would replace wages when people need to take time off for health and care-giving needs.

The report, by the Berkeley Center on Health, Economic & Family Security (Berkeley CHEFS) and Georgetown Law’s Workplace Flexibility 2010, is called “Family Security Insurance: A New Foundation for Economic Security” and is available here.

Based on a substantive review of current data, law, and policy, the report outlines a nearly universal need among working Americans for time off from work to address personal illness, care for a new child, or care for a loved one with a serious illness. It asserts that this need is no longer an issue for individual families or select industries, but a national priority with major social and economic implications.

“The report describes how Family Security Insurance would fundamentally reform social policy to address workers’ critical needs,” said Berkeley CHEFS Executive Director Ann O’Leary ’05. “At the same time, it would spread the cost fairly, protect the deficit, and keep people working.”

O’Leary co-authored the report with Berkeley Law Professors Stephen Sugarman and Gillian Lester, Berkeley CHEFS Counsel Angela Clements '09, and members of the Georgetown Law faculty. On December 2 at the National Press Club in Washington, D.C., O’Leary, Sugarman, and Lester helped launch the report by appearing on a panel with two Georgetown colleagues to discuss the proposal’s key items.

Family Security Insurance would reform the current social insurance system to provide for income replacement when people take time off from work for health and care-giving reasons. The report outlines the benefits that would be provided, who would be eligible, how the program would be administered, and how to fund it.

The recommendations cover income replacement for three important life events: one’s own serious illness or temporary disability that renders a worker temporarily unable to perform his or her job; arrival of a child who needs care and time to bond with parents; and the serious illness of a family member who needs care.

Family Security Insurance would be a national social insurance program not paid for by the government, but by spreading the cost among workers and their employers to create a fair, predictable foundation of support.

“Spreading the costs between employers and employees is fair because both will benefit from Family Security Insurance,” said Sugarman. “Employers will be more able to retain good workers and employees will receive a basic level of economic security when they need to be temporarily away from the workforce. Having employers and employees pay for Family Security Insurance will also ensure that it's not a government funded welfare program that would add to the national deficit.”

Explore further: Proposed Social Security benefit cuts won't reduce deficit, expert says

More information: … e_2010_Final_web.pdf

Related Stories

Satisfying job leads to better mental health

October 14, 2010

( -- If you want to have good mental health, it’s not enough to just have a job, you should also have a job that satisfies you, according to new research from The Australian National University.

Unions make both members and nonmembers happier

November 5, 2010

It’s no coincidence that American workers have never been more dissatisfied with their jobs, and labor unions’ membership keeps dropping, according to a new study co-authored by University of Notre Dame political ...

Report: Employers to see 2011 medical costs jump

June 14, 2010

(AP) -- Companies that offer employee health insurance expect another steep jump in medical costs next year, and more will ask workers to share a bigger chunk of the expense, according to a new PricewaterhouseCoopers report.

The stress of work becomes social issue

November 1, 2010

The sharp rise in work stress in Britain is becoming a major social problem in the current economic crisis, a new British Academy report has found.

Recommended for you

New paper answers causation conundrum

November 17, 2017

In a new paper published in a special issue of the Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A, SFI Professor Jessica Flack offers a practical answer to one of the most significant, and most confused questions in evolutionary ...

Chance discovery of forgotten 1960s 'preprint' experiment

November 16, 2017

For years, scientists have complained that it can take months or even years for a scientific discovery to be published, because of the slowness of peer review. To cut through this problem, researchers in physics and mathematics ...


Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

3 / 5 (2) Dec 06, 2010
Oh, goody. Another monstrous entitlement with costs to be mandated by the nanny state. When we're in a hole, depend on the left to bring in the heavy digging equipment.
5 / 5 (1) Dec 07, 2010
Supported by Maria Shriver and also the Center For American Progress no less...

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.