Large study shows females are equal to males in math skills

( -- The mathematical skills of boys and girls, as well as men and women, are substantially equal, according to a new examination of existing studies in the current online edition of journal Psychological Bulletin.

One portion of the new study looked systematically at 242 articles that assessed the math skills of 1,286,350 people, says chief author Janet Hyde, a professor of psychology and women's studies at the University of Wisconsin-Madison.

These studies, all published in English between 1990 and 2007, looked at people from grade school to college and beyond. A second portion of the new study examined the results of several large, long-term scientific studies, including the National Assessment of Educational Progress.

In both cases, Hyde says, the difference between the two sexes was so close as to be meaningless.

Sara Lindberg, now a postdoctoral fellow in women's health at the UW-Madison School of Medicine and Public Health, was the primary author of the meta-analysis in .

The idea that both genders have equal is widely accepted among , Hyde adds, but word has been slow to reach teachers and parents, who can play a negative role by guiding girls away from math-heavy sciences and engineering. "One reason I am still spending time on this is because parents and teachers continue to hold stereotypes that boys are better in math, and that can have a tremendous impact on individual girls who are told to stay away from engineering or the physical sciences because 'Girls can't do the math.'"

Scientists now know that stereotypes affect performance, Hyde adds. "There is lots of evidence that what we call 'stereotype threat' can hold women back in math. If, before a test, you imply that the women should expect to do a little worse than the men, that hurts performance. It's a self-fulfilling prophecy.

"Parents and teachers give little implicit messages about how good they expect kids to be at different subjects," Hyde adds, "and that powerfully affects their self-concept of their ability. When you are deciding about a major in physics, this can become a huge factor."

Hyde hopes the new results will slow the trend toward single-sex schools, which are sometimes justified on the basis of differential math skills. It may also affect standardized tests, which gained clout with the passage of No Child Left Behind, and tend to emphasize lower-level math skills such as multiplication, Hyde says. "High-stakes testing really needs to include higher-level problem-solving, which tends to be more important in jobs that require . But because many teachers teach to the test, they will not teach higher reasoning unless the tests start to include it."

The new findings reinforce a recent study that ranked gender dead last among nine factors, including parental education, family income, and school effectiveness, in influencing the math performance of 10-year-olds.

Hyde acknowledges that women have made significant advances in technical fields. Half of medical school students are female, as are 48 percent of undergraduate math majors. "If women can't do math, how are they getting these majors?" she asks.

Because progress in physics and engineering is much slower, "we have lots of work to do," Hyde says. "This persistent stereotyping disadvantages girls. My message to parents is that they should have confidence in their daughter's math performance. They need to realize that women can do math just as well as men. These changes will encourage women to pursue occupations that require lots of math."

Explore further

Worldwide study finds few gender differences in math abilities

Citation: Large study shows females are equal to males in math skills (2010, October 11) retrieved 23 August 2019 from
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.

Feedback to editors

User comments

Oct 11, 2010
Great, so now that's finally settled... Again... Still...


Oct 11, 2010
If this means that women lack none of the vital skills for certain occupations, doesn't this imply that any deviance is entirely due to their choices? The alternative reasoning is that their choices are constrained by external pressures, but this is a feedback loop: people do more of what they're expected to.

And while we could pep talk little girls, shouldn't we also be holding older women accountable for setting examples?

Fortunately boys are proven to have lower verbal skills than girls, so the follow the inverse trend: of giving them a break due to extenuating circumstances. Boys aren't penalized for their verbal skills...right?

Oct 11, 2010
Seems to me that the study did little more than prove something already known: no significant gender difference in math skills.

The rest of the article is simply conjecture and unsupported conclusion as to why there are smaller percentage of females in "math-heavy" occupations.

Where is the supporting evidence for this logic?

Oct 11, 2010
One reason for gender differences at the extremes might be personality ie men tend to be more obsessive than women. Consider the gender ratio in Asperger's.

Oct 12, 2010
I'm also amazed at the focus on something like this, over and over considering how FAIL the overall school system is in the United States. Whats the graduation ranking in the world now, 9th? Wasn't it 1st a decade ago? So gender doesn't make a difference in math, and women graduate almost twice as many from college as guys. Sooo, gee it's almost as if career path and "equal work's definition(LOL, no biasness there)" are main contributers for the "victim-hood" of American women in pay. I'm pretty sure boys need more help nowadays in school, but it seems as if any change that doesn't improve female performance isn't even evaluated despite if it were to help boys out or not. I'm honestly shocked that so many guys do still graduate with no engagement, a toss to the side and don't disturb the girls attitude in the school system, marginalization of any male figures, and virtually no male teachers especially at elementary level. Victim and/or Elitist equality doesn't add up.

Oct 12, 2010
Yeah, why are we worrying about Black/White or Boy/Girl population differences when the group deviance between US and other OECDs is much higher? It's because one of these is more convenient to talk about. US vs. OECD comparisons transcend the familiar privilege-oriented arguments.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more