Big brains attributed to mother's care

The evolution of big-brained mammals may be due to maternal investment, rather than metabolism, according to a new study by scientists at UCL (University College London) and the University of Cambridge.

Published today in (PNAS), the study analysed data sets of the brain sizes of 197 marsupial and 457 to test the influences of metabolism versus maternal investment on evolution.

Contrary to popular hypotheses, researchers found that marsupial mammals, for example kangaroos and possums, had relative brain sizes that are just as big as placental mammals (dogs, horses etc), and even tend to be bigger-brained in some cases.

Big brains in both groups were correlated to length of maternal care, for example a longer period of lactation. However, basal metabolic rate, or the energy an animal expends at rest, did not correlate with marsupial brain size, whereas they did correlate in placental mammals. High metabolism was previously thought to be a requirement for big brains as is costly to run.

Marsupial brains grow slowly and mainly after birth in the mother’s pouch, whereas placental mammal brains grow rapidly during gestation, where they benefit from the high metabolic rate of the mother. This study suggests that large brain size can evolve in mammals with low metabolisms as long as they have a period of extended maternal care after birth.

The researchers also suggest that the evolution of the hugely enlarged brains of some primates can be accounted for by their extended brain growth both during gestation and after birth during a lengthy maternal caring period.

Dr. Vera Weisbecker, a joint postdoctoral fellow at the University of Cambridge, Jena University (Germany) and UCL’s Department of Genetics, Evolution & Environment, and lead author of the paper said: “Maternal investment is a much more universal factor in the evolution of big brains than metabolic rate”.

Dr. Anjali Goswami, UCL Department of Genetics, Evolution & Environment and Earth Sciences, and co-author of the paper added, “For a long time, our interest in our own large brains has focused the field on placental characteristics, such as high basal , and made us overlook the role of maternal care after birth on the evolution of big brains.

“However, if we take primates out of the equation, we discover that marsupials, despite having much lower metabolic rates, have similarly sized brains, or sometimes even bigger brains, than their placental mammal counterparts. So clearly, evolving big brains isn’t just about having a high metabolism. Instead, it seems that maternal care is the most consistent factor driving the development of big brains across all mammals.”

Brain development in the two groups is a case of ‘the hare and the tortoise’. Placental mammals are the ‘hares’ - their brains develop very fast during gestation, with relatively little growth after birth. Marsupials are the ‘tortoises’ - they are born with very little of their brain developed but then grow slowly and steadily for an extended period after birth whilst they are being cared for by their mothers.

“It appears that primate brains benefit from the best of both methods of increasing brain size - their brains grow rapidly during gestation in line with their fellow placental mammals, but also develop significantly after birth during a maternal care period which is only comparable to marsupials in terms of length,” added Dr. Goswami.


Explore further

Why newborn babies can't walk

Citation: Big brains attributed to mother's care (2010, September 7) retrieved 20 September 2019 from https://phys.org/news/2010-09-big-brains-attributed-mother.html
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.
0 shares

Feedback to editors

User comments

Sep 07, 2010
Makes sense. The evolution of behavior might be easier than the evolution of metabolism or pelvic bone structure (big brain = big head).

Sep 07, 2010
It of course has nothing to do with the fact that intelligence is the largest evolutionary advantage we know of.

Intelligence is so huge it's basically an end unto itself in evolutionary terms...there need to be no "reason" or "mystery" as to why we evolved intelligence.

I for one think it had about as much to do with "mother's care" as it had to do with anything else...making fire, spears, stone knives, and using bear skins in the winter to cover ourselves.

Maybe "smarter moms" just care about their "kids" more and hence interested in their care longer.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more