US top scientists urge coal, oil use penalties

(AP) -- Ditching its past cautious tone, the nation's top scientists urged the government Wednesday to take drastic action to raise the cost of using coal and oil to slow global warming.

The specifically called for a carbon tax on fossil fuels or a cap-and-trade system for curbing , calling global warming an urgent threat.

The academy, which advises the government on scientific matters, said the nation needs to cut the pollution that causes global warming by about 57 percent to 83 percent by 2050. That's close to President Barack Obama's goal.

"We really need to get started right away. It's not opinion, it's what the science tells you," said academy panel vice chairman Robert Fri, who was acting chief under President Richard Nixon. "The country needs both a prompt and a sustained commitment to reducing greenhouse gas emissions."

In the past, the academy has called climate change a problem, but it has never recommended a specific policy. The impetus for its bolder stance now was a set of questions posed by Congress on climate change and how to deal with it.

The cap-and-trade idea, which is supported by the Obama administration, has been proposed for several years in Congress but never passed the Senate. It would set overall limits on carbon dioxide pollution, but would allow companies to pollute more by paying for it and buying pollution credits from cleaner companies.

Last year, the House approved a cap-and-trade bill, but it stalled in the Senate as health care legislation took center stage. A new version, that doesn't use the cap-and-trade phrase but has similar characteristics, was introduced last week. Lawmakers have pledged a floor vote on the bill this summer.

The national academy is an elite independent organization chartered to give the federal government advice on science and technical matters. Being elected as an academy member is considered a major honor for a scientist.

In a series of three reports, the panel tried to illustrate the challenge ahead by describing tons of polluting gases as money in a budget. America is on an escalating trajectory to blow its budget. The budget allows for the use of 170 to 200 billion tons between now and 2050. In 2008, America spewed 7 billion tons of greenhouse gas.

"If we continue at the same rate we're going, we're going to use that up quickly, which is the case for urgency," said panel member Ed Rubin, an engineering and public policy professor at Carnegie Mellon University.

Panel members said this is unusual for the academy to be so blunt about what needs to be done. But Congress asked the academy in 2008 to answer four questions, starting with: "What short-term actions can be taken to respond effectively to climate change?" Panel members said that is what gave them freedom to say more about what needs to be done.

The result was three reports issued Wednesday, totaling 869 pages. The reports come after a winter in which mainstream climate science took a beating because of leaked e-mails from a British university and errors revealed in the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change's report. And in December despite dozens of world leaders seeking a climate deal in Copenhagen, countries could not agree to renew and tighten mandatory curbs on greenhouse gas emissions.

All the criticism and inaction spurred the national academy to deliver a sharper message, said panel chair Pam Matson, dean of earth sciences at Stanford University.

Change is occurring in warmer temperatures, melting ice caps, sea rise and many other areas that have been carefully studied, Matson said. Future changes will include water and food shortages in many areas, more heat waves and increased intense rainfall in some regions.

The reports agrees with the international climate panel's earlier assessment, noting that is already occurring "and poses significant risks for - and in many cases is already affecting - a broad range of human and natural systems."

White House science adviser John Holdren praised the panel's work as "well-documented in their science, clear in their exposition and compelling in their conclusions about policy." He said he hoped every member of Congress would read the reports or at least their summaries.


Explore further

EPA finds greenhouse gases pose a danger to health

More information: The National Academy of Sciences: http://www.nap.edu
Nature: http://www.nature.com

©2010 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Citation: US top scientists urge coal, oil use penalties (2010, May 19) retrieved 20 August 2019 from https://phys.org/news/2010-05-scientists-urge-coal-oil-penalties.html
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.
0 shares

Feedback to editors

User comments

May 20, 2010
Forgive my skeptical response but this set of reports has the feel of being orchestrated or at least coordinated by the Obama White House. For 300 years in western civilization, each generation has bestowed the next with an overall better world and a higher standard of living. That is at an end if these guys get what they're after. An 80% reduction, which cap and trade has as its goal is not achievable and the architects of the bill know it. Hence the new sweeping authority will never end. The United States is ceasing to be the greatest country on Earth.

May 22, 2010
Once again, your scientists are goofy, thinking that AGW is the cause of whatever global warming is or is not occurring. Just like the discredited people closely tied to the UN's Climate faithful, you must provide adequate proofs - not political assertions. I am tired of demands that people like you be believed. I know so many academics, most of whom are loonier than the great unwashed and uneducated. So, unless you can publish adequate, verifiable proofs, just fade back into the obscurity you so justly deserve.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more