Why Won't the Supernova Explode?

January 7, 2010 by Patrick Barry
A supercomputer model of a rapidly-spinning, core-collapse supernova. NuSTAR observations of actual supernova remnants will provide vital data for such models and help explain how massive supernovas manage to explode. Credit: Fiona Harrison/Caltech.

A massive old star is about to die a spectacular death. As its nuclear fuel runs out, it begins to collapse under its own tremendous weight. The crushing pressure inside the star skyrockets, triggering new nuclear reactions, setting the stage for a terrifying blast. And then... nothing happens.

At least that's what supercomputers have been telling astrophysicists for decades. Many of the best computer models of explosions fail to produce an explosion. Instead, according to the simulations, gravity wins the day and the star simply collapses.

Clearly, physicists are missing something.

"We don't really understand how supernovas of work yet," says Fiona Harrison, an astrophysicist at the California Institute of Technology. The death of relatively small stars is better understood, but for larger stars — those with more than about 9 times the mass of our sun — the physics just doesn't add up.

Something must be helping the outward push of radiation and other pressures overcome the inward squeeze of gravity. To figure out what that "something" is, scientists need to examine the inside of a real supernova while it's exploding — not a particularly easy thing to do!

An artist's concept of NuSTAR. Focusing X-ray optics require long focal lengths--hence the 10-meter deployable mast, which is extended after launch.

But that's exactly what Harrison intends to do with a new space telescope she and her colleagues are developing called the Nuclear Spectroscopic Telescope Array, or NuSTAR.

After it launches in 2011 aboard a Pegasus rocket, NuSTAR will give scientists an unprecedented view of high-energy X-rays coming from supernova remnants, black holes, blazars, and other extreme cosmic phenomena. NuSTAR will be the first space telescope that can actually focus these high-energy X-rays, producing images roughly 100 times sharper than those possible with previous telescopes.

Using NuSTAR, scientists will look for clues to conditions inside the etched into the pattern of elements spread throughout the nebula that remains after the star explodes.

"You don't get the opportunity to watch these explosions very often, ones that are close enough to study in detail," Harrison says. "What we can do is study the remnants. The composition and distribution of the material in the remnants tells you a lot about the explosion."

One element in particular is of keen interest: titanium-44. Creating this isotope of titanium through nuclear fusion requires a certain combination of energy, pressure, and raw materials. Inside the collapsing star, that combination occurs at a depth that's very special. Everything below that depth will succumb to gravity and collapse inward to form a black hole. Everything above that depth will be blown outward in the explosion. Titanium-44 is created right at the cusp.

So the pattern of how titanium-44 is spread throughout a nebula can reveal a lot about what happened at that crucial threshold during the explosion. And with that information, scientists might be able to figure out what's wrong with their computer simulations.

Some scientists believe the computer models are too symmetrical. Until recently, even with powerful supercomputers, scientists have only been able to simulate a one-dimensional sliver of the star. Scientists just assume that the rest of the star behaves similarly, making the simulated implosion the same in all radial directions.

But what if that assumption is wrong?

"Asymmetries could be the key," Harrison says. In an asymmetrical collapse, outward forces could break through in some places even if the crush of gravity is overpowering in others. Indeed, more recent, two-dimensional simulations suggest that asymmetries could help solve the mystery of the "non-exploding supernova."

The x-ray "light path" of the EPIC camera of the XMM-Newton satellite, a Wolter-I design similar to that used by NuSTAR. Credit: ESA/ESTEC.

If NuSTAR finds that titanium-44 is spread unevenly, it would be evidence that the explosions themselves were also asymmetrical, Harrison explains.

To detect titanium-44, NuSTAR needs to be able to focus very high energy X-rays. Titanium-44 is radioactive, and when it decays it releases gamma rays with an energy of 68 kilo-electronvolts (keV). Existing X-ray space telescopes, such as NASA's Chandra X-Ray Observatory, can only focus X-rays up to about 15 keV.

Normal lenses can't focus X-rays at all. Glass bends X-rays only a miniscule amount, so for a glass lens to bend X-rays enough to focus them, it would have to be so thick that it would adsorb the X-rays instead.

X-ray telescopes use an entirely different kind of lens. Called a Wolter-I optic, it consists of many cylindrical shells, each one slightly smaller and placed inside the last. The result looks a bit like the layers of a cylindrical onion (if there were such a thing), with small gaps between the layers.

Incoming X-rays pass between these layers, which guide the X-rays to the focal surface. It's not a lens, strictly speaking, because the X-rays reflect off the surfaces instead of passing through them the way light passes through a glass lens. But the end result is the same.

NuSTAR's Wolter-I optic has a special atomic-precision coating that enables its layers to reflect X-rays with energies as high as 79 keV. Harrison and her colleagues have spent years perfecting the delicate manufacturing techniques for making these high-precision layers. Together with a new sensor that can tolerate these high energies, these finely crafted layers are what enable NuSTAR to image these relatively unexplored, high-intensity X-rays.

And the discoveries won't stop with supernovas. High-energy X-rays are emitted by many of the universe's most extreme phenomena, including supermassive and blazars. NuSTAR will give us a new window on the universe at its most extreme.

Explore further: NASA NuSTAR Telescope Being Built at Nevis

Related Stories

NASA NuSTAR Telescope Being Built at Nevis

December 17, 2009

(PhysOrg.com) -- It's an unlikely place to build a NASA telescope: a leafy estate in Irvington, N.Y., that once belonged to the son of Alexander Hamilton. Inside a hangar-like building on the site, which is home to Columbia’s Nevis ...

NASA Approves X-ray Space Mission

September 7, 2009

NASA recently confirmed that the Nuclear Spectroscopic Telescope Array, or NuSTAR, mission will launch in August 2011.

On the Scent of a Pre-Historic Particle Accelerator?

February 9, 2006

An international team of astrophysicists have used the H.E.S.S. telescopes to uncover the trail of a 10,000 year old supernova at the heart of the Milky Way. In a paper published in Nature (6th February 2006), they describe ...

An Oxygen Factory in a Nearby Galaxy

March 17, 2008

This Chandra X-ray Observatory image shows the debris of a massive star explosion in the Large Magellanic Cloud, a small galaxy about 160,000 light years from Earth.

Very High Energy Gamma Rays

September 25, 2009

(PhysOrg.com) -- Gamma-rays are the most energetic known form of electromagnetic radiation, with each gamma ray being at least one hundred thousand times more energetic than an optical light photon. The most potent gamma ...

Recommended for you

SpaceX to launch classified US govt payload Sunday

April 29, 2017

SpaceX on Sunday is scheduled to make its first military launch, with a classified payload for the National Reconnaissance Office, which makes and operates spy satellites for the United States.

Is dark matter 'fuzzy'?

April 28, 2017

Astronomers have used data from NASA's Chandra X-ray Observatory to study the properties of dark matter, the mysterious, invisible substance that makes up a majority of matter in the universe. The study, which involves 13 ...

Hubble's bright shining lizard star

April 28, 2017

In space, being outshone is an occupational hazard. This NASA/ESA Hubble Space Telescope image captures a galaxy named NGC 7250. Despite being remarkable in its own right—it has bright bursts of star formation and recorded ...


Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

3 / 5 (2) Jan 07, 2010
Fantastic, I love it when Physorg actually covers REAL science!
5 / 5 (1) Jan 07, 2010
Why Won't the Supernova Explode?

Does anyone else see an oxymoron?

If it doesn't explode it isn't a nova or supernova.
1 / 5 (1) Jan 08, 2010
This makes me wonder if the computer models aren't generally correct. Perhaps the supernovas we observe are simply, rare exceptions.
not rated yet Jan 08, 2010
if titanium44 is the last fusion product to escape the black hole, where does our uranium come from?
not rated yet Jan 08, 2010
Yes, the headline should have read, "Why doesn't the computer simulation of a supernova explode?" Fully covered in the second paragraph.

Computer models are always simplifications. Sometimes, as in this case, overly simplified due to computing constraints. Covered in the article.

T44 is not the last element formed, nor does the article imply that at any point. As covered in the article, it is formed at the interface between the part that explodes and the part that collapses.

It is nice to see some real science. Pity that people are so used to reading fluff that they don't catch the details.
not rated yet Jan 08, 2010
Clearly, physicists are missing something.

It's obvious what is missing - a single framework unifying gravitation and quantum effects.
not rated yet Jan 08, 2010
"Scientists just assume that the rest of the star behaves similarly, making the simulated implosion the same in all radial directions. But what if that assumption is wrong?"

I believe Spitzer and NASA have already answered this? Or do I read wrong? I was looking for the time lapsed images of a pulsing developing supernova, but I can't find the link, and it showed quite obviously that the forces were not at all occurring symmetrically.

1 / 5 (1) Jan 08, 2010
At least we can rule out gravitational collapse theory being the point of failure.

Clearly, it's everything but.
not rated yet Jan 09, 2010
"if titanium44 is the last fusion product to escape the black hole, where does our uranium come from?"

Neutrino emissions from the collapsing star strike ejected atoms. Atomic nuclei disintegrate and re-form later, producing all naturally occurring elements.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.