NASA to Check for Unlikely Winter Survival of Mars Lander

NASA to Check for Unlikely Winter Survival of Mars Lander
NASA's Phoenix Mars Lander is visible within this enhanced-color image of the Phoenix landing site taken on Jan. 6, 2010 by the High Resolution Imaging Science Experiment (HiRISE) camera on NASA's Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter. Image credit: NASA/JPL-Caltech/University of Arizona

(PhysOrg.com) -- Beginning Jan. 18, NASA's Mars Odyssey orbiter will listen for possible, though improbable, radio transmissions from the Phoenix Mars Lander, which completed five months of studying an arctic Martian site in November 2008.

The solar-powered lander operated two months longer than its three-month prime mission during summer on northern before the seasonal ebb of sunshine ended its work. Since then, Phoenix's landing site has gone through autumn, winter and part of spring. The lander's hardware was not designed to survive the temperature extremes and ice-coating load of an arctic Martian winter.

In the extremely unlikely case that Phoenix survived the winter, it is expected to follow instructions programmed on its computer. If systems still operate, once its generate enough electricity to establish a positive energy balance, the lander would periodically try to communicate with any available Mars relay orbiters in an attempt to reestablish contact with Earth. During each communications attempt, the lander would alternately use each of its two radios and each of its two antennas.

Odyssey will pass over the Phoenix landing site approximately 10 times each day during three consecutive days of listening this month and two longer listening campaigns in February and March.

"We do not expect Phoenix to have survived, and therefore do not expect to hear from it. However, if Phoenix is transmitting, Odyssey will hear it," said Chad Edwards, chief telecommunications engineer for the Mars Exploration Program at NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena, Calif. "We will perform a sufficient number of Odyssey contact attempts that if we don't detect a transmission from Phoenix, we can have a high degree of confidence that the lander is not active."

The amount of sunshine at Phoenix's site is currently about the same as when the lander last communicated, on Nov. 2, 2008, with the sun above the horizon about 17 hours each day. The listening attempts will continue until after the sun is above the horizon for the full 24.7 hours of the Martian day at the lander's high-latitude site. During the later attempts in February or March, Odyssey will transmit radio signals that could potentially be heard by Phoenix, as well as passively listening.

If Odyssey does hear from Phoenix, the orbiter will attempt to lock onto the signal and gain information about the lander's status. The initial task would be to determine what capabilities Phoenix retains, information that would consider in decisions about any further steps.


Explore further

Spacecraft at Mars Prepare to Welcome New Kid on the Block

Provided by JPL/NASA
Citation: NASA to Check for Unlikely Winter Survival of Mars Lander (2010, January 12) retrieved 18 October 2019 from https://phys.org/news/2010-01-nasa-winter-survival-mars-lander.html
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.
0 shares

Feedback to editors

User comments

Jan 12, 2010
Great shot of the Phoenix! Why don't we get the other high resolution pictures taken of Mars released with this quality?

Jan 13, 2010
A bit late at this stage, but could we mount a high powered laser on an orbital platform, and periodically beam energy to a ground based experiment, and so thereby extending it's winter survivability?

Clearly this could only work on future projects, but is the idea bereft of merit?

Jan 14, 2010
A bit late at this stage, but could we mount a high powered laser on an orbital platform, and periodically beam energy to a ground based experiment, and so thereby extending it's winter survivability? Clearly this could only work on future projects, but is the idea bereft of merit?


Where does the energy come from to run the laser? How about a mirror?


Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more