U of A students reaffirm the work of a 1920s paleontologist

Three University of Alberta paleontology graduate students blew the dust off an 85-year-old dinosaur find to discover the original researcher had it right and a 1970s revision of his work was wrong.

The U of A grad were studying a 76 million year old armadillo-like, armoured dinosaur. It was found in 1924 in southern Alberta. Victoria Arbour was focused on the fossilized remains of the animal's pelvis and clubbed tail. Mike Burns examined its body armour and , and Robin Sissons was interested in how the animal got around, concentrating her work on its foot and limb mechanics.

The students travelled to the Royal Ontario Museum in Toronto and began a detailed examination of the . When they combined their findings the trio discovered the specimen had been misidentified as the anklyosaur species Euoplocephalus. That re-classification was given to the bones in the mid '70's, supposedly correcting the original 1924 research by the late Canadian , William Parks.

After re-examining the bones found by Parks and comparing them to more recent ankylosaur finds from Alberta the students came to a conclusion: Parks was right all along. His dinosaur is an ankylosaur, Dyoplosaurus, meaning "double armoured dinosaur.

This discovery increases the number of known ankylosaur species. The lesson learned by the students in their investigation is that new dinosaur discoveries and new technologies enable researchers to reassess old ideas.

The students' work will be published this week in the Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology.

Source: University of Alberta (news : web)


Explore further

Mysterious mountain dino may be a new species

Citation: U of A students reaffirm the work of a 1920s paleontologist (2009, December 14) retrieved 28 November 2020 from https://phys.org/news/2009-12-students-reaffirm-1920s-paleontologist.html
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.
0 shares

Feedback to editors

User comments