Shifting blame is socially contagious

November 19, 2009,

Merely observing someone publicly blame an individual in an organization for a problem - even when the target is innocent - greatly increases the odds that the practice of blaming others will spread with the tenacity of the H1N1 flu, according to new research from the USC Marshall School of Business and Stanford University.

Nathanael J. Fast, an assistant professor of management and organization at the USC Marshall School of Business and Larissa Tiedens, a professor of at Stanford, conducted four different experiments and found that publicly blaming others dramatically increases the likelihood that the practice will become viral. The reason: blame spreads quickly because it triggers the perception that one's self-image is under assault and must be protected.

The study called "Blame Contagion: The Automatic Transmission of Self-Serving Attributions" is believed to be the first to examine whether shifting blame to others is socially contagious. The results will be published in the November issue of .

"When we see others protecting their egos, we become defensive too," says Fast, the study's lead author. "We then try to protect our own self-image by blaming others for our mistakes, which may feel good in the moment." He adds that in the long run, such behavior could hurt one's reputation and be destructive to an organization and further to our society as a whole.

Tiedens said the study didn't specifically look at the impact of hard economic times, but it undoubtedly makes the problem worse. "Blaming becomes common when people are worried about their safety in an organization," she said. "There is likely to be more blaming going on when people feel their jobs are threatened."

Fast says that when public blaming becomes common practice - especially by leaders -- its effects on an organization can be insidious and withering: Individuals who are fearful of being blamed for something become less willing to take risks, are less innovative or creative, and are less likely to learn from their mistakes.

"Blame creates a culture of fear," Fast said, "and this leads to a host of negative consequences for individuals and for groups."

A manager can keep a lid on the behavior by rewarding employees who learn from their mistakes and by making a point to acknowledge publicly his or her own mistakes, Fast says. Managers may also want to assign blame, when necessary, in private and offer praise in public to create a positive attitude in the workplace.

Or, managers could follow the lead of companies such as Intuit, which implemented a "When Learning Hurts" session where they celebrated and learned from mistakes, rather than pointing fingers and assigning blame. The blame contagion research provides empirical evidence that such a practice can avoid negative effects in the culture of the organization.

Anyone can become a blamer, Fast says, but there are some common traits. Typically, they are more ego defensive, have a higher likelihood of being narcissistic, and tend to feel chronically insecure.

President Richard Nixon is one example the authors point to in the study. Nixon harbored an intense need to enhance and protect his self-image and, as a result, made a practice of blaming others for his shortcomings. His former aides reported that that this ego-defensiveness pervaded his administration. It was the culture of fear and blame that ultimately led to Nixon's political downfall.

The experiments showed that individuals who watched someone blame another for mistakes went on to do the same with others. In one experiment, half of the participants were asked to read a newspaper article about a failure by Governor Schwarzenegger who blamed special interest groups for the controversial special election that failed in 2005, costing the state $250 million. A second group read an article in which the governor took full responsibility for the failure.

Those who read about the governor blaming special interest groups were more likely to blame others for their own, unrelated shortcomings, compared with those who read about Schwarzenegger shouldering the responsibility.

Another experiment found that self-affirmation inoculated participants from blame. The tendency for blame to spread was completely eliminated in a group of participants who had the opportunity to affirm their self-worth.

"By giving participants the chance to bolster their self-worth we removed their need to self protect though subsequent blaming," says Fast.

The results have particularly important implications for CEOs. Executives and leaders would be wise to learn from such examples, Fast suggests, and instead display behaviors that help to foster a culture of psychological safety, learning, and innovation.

Source: University of Southern California (news : web)

Explore further: Asking forgiveness is not always as easy as saying 'I'm sorry'

Related Stories

Asking forgiveness is not always as easy as saying 'I'm sorry'

November 3, 2005

Tales of corporate scandal and political misdeeds have made spectacular headlines in recent years - just the mention of Enron or Bill Clinton conjure up memories of those offenses. But on a day-to-day basis, most people don't ...

Reflecting on values promotes love, acceptance

July 22, 2008

No one enjoys being told that their behavior is harmful to themselves or others. In fact, most people respond defensively when confronted with evidence that their behavior is irrational, irresponsible, or unhealthy. Fortunately, ...

Powerful people take more risks

September 21, 2006

Powerful people view life through rose-colored glasses, with their more optimistic outlook ultimately leading them to engage in riskier behavior.

Recommended for you

Unprecedented study of Picasso's bronzes uncovers new details

February 17, 2018

Musee national Picasso-Paris and the Northwestern University/Art Institute of Chicago Center for Scientific Studies in the Arts (NU-ACCESS) have completed the first major material survey and study of the Musee national Picasso-Paris' ...

Using Twitter to discover how language changes

February 16, 2018

Scientists at Royal Holloway, University of London, have studied more than 200 million Twitter messages to try and unravel the mystery of how language evolves and spreads.


Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

not rated yet Nov 21, 2009
Regretably the culture of blaming has become more prevalent in recent years. I suspect the press has played a large role here. They love to lay blame to bring others down in order to gain the headlines and create spectacles. But, to our detriment this is socially corrosive. Another example I have noticed in the UK (since I have returned after 20 years overseas) is the TV advertising of solicitors who encourage 'victims' to claim compensation at no cost, for accidents that 'in the old days' we were taught by our parents to take personal responsibility for. While occasionally it is justified to sue and claim compensation - the trend of blaming, for a 'quick buck' is disturbing. The other downside is that most of the time the one being sued is not a mega-company with deep pockets, but a small business that has sacrificed much to stay afloat and to make a living, and provide for its employees. Do you think this current generation deplores or even notices the trend? I hope so.
not rated yet Nov 23, 2009
would like to see numerical analysis to quantify effect in real world environment with analysis of real world variables. This is good work, but needs to go beyond a discovery of connection and into an engineerable result driven model.

Also, While the idea of blaming can spread via a memetic transmission model, it seems also likely to be a game theory and chaos theory depended effect. consider for example that seeing the success or failure of someone else blaming establishes an environmental response pattern. While the first person to blame takes a risk of encountering a "noblame" culture the followers have an idea of how the other people in the culture react to blaming as a practice. Also if no one blames there may be game theory incentives to blame since it's possible there is no longer a harsh penalty for blaming. It could be there's some equilibrium level of blaming determined by other variables for maximum personal success.
not rated yet Nov 26, 2009
Quantifying with numerical analysis is perhaps very useful for people who understand such methods, but what really does it hope to solve for those who don't understand how to do numerical analysis or learn game theory, chaos theory, etc? If we each look at our own lives and can draw from our own experiences of how blame causes one to feel, and what we can learn to do differently, would be a far better approach I feel. It's something we each can do starting now, instead of waiting for so-called experts to tell us that we should reconsider when wanting to blame. We need look no further than the person in the mirror. However that Intuit has found a unique way to learn from their mistakes, is very good news and is a great example of learning to direct one's resources away from blame.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.