Science wins fight over evolution in schools, says Case Western Reserve University author

October 8, 2009,

If you want to understand how evolution has challenged the constitutionality of the separation of church and state, Mano Singham from Case Western Reserve University provides a concise and chronological history in his new book, God vs. Darwin: the War between Evolution and Creationism in the Classroom (Rowman & Littlefield, 2009).

God vs. Darwin comes just weeks before the 150th anniversary of Charles Darwin's landmark book, On the Origins of Species, which has been at the center of the debate over how the diversity of all living things came about. Did it happen largely through the mechanism of natural selection as Darwin proposed or, as religious fundamentalists believe, did some supreme being craft the universe about 6,000 years ago along with all the species we see around us, and in particular, design humans with higher thought processes?

The country's early leaders saw the potential dangers of having religion and religious establishments become too closely aligned with government and penned a Constitution with a First Amendment to protect freedoms of speech and the practice of all religions from Congressional interference. Later the 14th Amendment extended that ruling to state and local governments.

"The First Amendment places limits on what you can and cannot do in the public school classroom," says Singham, director of the University Center for Innovation in Teaching and Education at Case Western Reserve University and adjunct associate professor of physics. "That amendment has been fleshed out over time, but many misunderstandings about that exist."

He set about writing the book to clarify those misconceptions.

"School districts cannot take a position that endorses or opposes religion," he says, and adds that time and again, people have reworked language to try to bypass the Constitution in order to either oppose the teaching of or to bring prayer and Bible readings back into the classroom.

Over the past century, evolution has become the rallying point to bring religion back into schools. Religious groups have stepped up efforts under such curricular guises as creation science, and .

Singham traces this history, beginning long before the John Scopes trial in 1925 challenged the teaching of evolution in the schools and made that challenge part of the American popular culture in movies and stage plays such as Inherit the Wind.

What most people may not know is that hostility to evolution did not initially motivate the Scopes trial. It was a publicity ploy to bring attention—and possibly tourist business—to Dayton, Tennessee. Although it never made it to the U.S. Supreme Court, the case set the stage for other trials that would set precedents to bolster, instead of tear down, the wall of separation between church and state.

Among the major evolution trials were: Epperson v. Arkansas (1968) that found a 1928 Arkansas law banning the teaching of evolution to be unconstitutional; Daniel v. Waters (1975) that overturned and found unconstitutional a law requiring the "balanced treatment" of teaching the Genesis story alongside evolution; and Edward v. Aguillard (1987) that found that just changing the balanced treatment mandate to require teaching a more neutral-sounding "creation science" was still unconstitutional because creation science invoked a supernatural agency as having a hand in creation. The last major case, Kitzmiller et al. v. Dover Area School District et al., was an attempt to advance the ideas of intelligent design. This was also found unconstitutional because it also had at its core a supernatural force and was thus religion- based.

The intelligent design idea was advocated by the Discovery Institute and attempted to bypass constitutional challenges and possibly make an inroad into the schools by removing all overt references to religion or requiring the teaching of alternative views to evolution. But School officials in Dover, by speaking out openly on behalf of religion, inadvertently sabotaged the Discovery Institute strategy.

The Dover case, says Singham, also brings the curtain down on the long history of religious groups trying to breach the wall between church and state.

According to Singham, losing the Dover case has demoralized the intelligent design movement, and at least for now, has put a nail in the coffin for religious groups to challenge evolution in the schools.

He thinks the issue is now settled, especially as the country's population seems to be shifting somewhat from organized religion to spiritualism or skepticism.

And, more evidence to support evolution continues to be discovered through scientific research, says Singham.
"The idea of evolution has caught the imaginations of people, who are interested in such findings as Tiktaalik (fish to amphibian fossil) or Ardi (a 4.4 million-year-old hominid skeleton)," says Singham.

But one message Singham wants readers to take away from his book is that the very Constitutional amendments that bar religion in the schools protect the freedom of religious practices.

"People who try to break down the separation of church and state are undermining the very thing that has served the country well and prevented a lot of interreligious fights," says Singham. Recalling the words of U.S. Supreme Court Justice Sandra Day O'Connor, he said, "Those who would renegotiate the boundaries between church and state must therefore answer a difficult question: Why would we trade a system that has served us so well for one that has served others so poorly?"

For now the battle between religion and Darwin has been won by science, says Singham.

Source: Case Western Reserve University (news : web)

Explore further: Intelligent design again stopped by court

Related Stories

Intelligent design again stopped by court

January 18, 2006

A California school district has reportedly decided to stop offering an elective course that includes discussion of religion-based alternatives to evolution.

'Intelligent design' trial in fourth week

October 18, 2005

An intelligent design activist has told a Harrisburg, Pa., federal court the concept is scientific and not a religious option for the theory of evolution.

Teaching evolution: Legal victories aren't enough

May 20, 2008

In many ways, much has changed since the famous Scopes Monkey trial of 1925. In recent years, US courts have consistently ruled that teaching explicitly religious alternatives to evolution in public schools is a violation ...

Recommended for you

Unprecedented study of Picasso's bronzes uncovers new details

February 17, 2018

Musee national Picasso-Paris and the Northwestern University/Art Institute of Chicago Center for Scientific Studies in the Arts (NU-ACCESS) have completed the first major material survey and study of the Musee national Picasso-Paris' ...

Using Twitter to discover how language changes

February 16, 2018

Scientists at Royal Holloway, University of London, have studied more than 200 million Twitter messages to try and unravel the mystery of how language evolves and spreads.


Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

Oct 08, 2009
This comment has been removed by a moderator.
1 / 5 (3) Oct 08, 2009
How did life begin and why?
Oct 08, 2009
This comment has been removed by a moderator.
Oct 08, 2009
This comment has been removed by a moderator.
4.2 / 5 (6) Oct 08, 2009
How did life begin and why?

Life did not begin. It evolved very gradually from non-living matter.
Science doesn't ask for reasons. It asks for causes. And it knows stochastic processes. Everything is governed by the laws of physics. "Physis" is Greek and means "nature".
5 / 5 (2) Oct 08, 2009
Marjon: What the article is about is teaching current scientific thought in school versus religious beliefs. There are over 2500 denominations of Christians in the USA, each one of them claiming they have a better understanding of what their accepted sacred books say than the others. Add a quite a few different Jewish scholars, two major Muslim traditions, Native American Religions, etc. The members of all of these pay taxes and expect a fair, impartial Government.
Oct 08, 2009
This comment has been removed by a moderator.
5 / 5 (1) Oct 09, 2009
How did life begin and why?
It's OK to admit I don't know.

Further, some religions can credit their God for evolution.

See: Pope John Paul II Declares Evolution to be Fact!

Evolution is not a common threat to religion, but evangelism and recruiting is common religious goal.

This declaration of Pope John Paul II is one way to recognized the law of the land, or case precedent, as a legitimate authority within the Catholic church.
1 / 5 (3) Oct 09, 2009
True, speciation of higher life forms may have occurred via gradual Darwinian evolutionary routes. But, as an industrial scientists who has relied on solid facts not philosophical ruminations throughout his career, I see absolutely no way how the hundreds of substrate-enzyme specific reactions in a chart of Metabolic Pathways, known to all biochemists, could have involved in other than an instantaneous mode that produced all of them simultaneously, as required for most living cells. No way this could have occurred in any evolutionary way over any time frame, unless there are scientists who can explain the metabolic chart other than by implausible "if pigs could fly chemistries", as concluded by the late molecular biologist, Dr Leslie Orgel, in 2007 in a review article of proposed primordial chemistries of transitions from inorganic chemicals to simple living species.
5 / 5 (1) Oct 10, 2009
As my father, a Presbyterian minister, often said, "Science does not teach religion, but by the same token, religion does not teach science."
5 / 5 (1) Oct 10, 2009
How did life begin and why?

a random fluke of chemical mixtures...hell even if some kind of higher power did still woulda used a fluke of chemical mixturess (albeit, it would be slightly less than a fluke then)


why does it always seem that people forget that we were NOT the only intelligent species on earth...we're only the last surviving branch that we know of...

ive said this before, and ill say it again...the day religion starts being taught in public schools next to science, i will take all 4 of my kids from those schools so my kids can learn fact and not fictional bs...
its a damned crime that any religious private schools were even ever allowed to be started. they in and of themselves, right long the lines of this article and book, completely bypass the first amendment..this just keeps people ignorant to the real truths and facts of the world...facts they otherwise blow off as something like "gods will"...

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.