Exploring reactions to inequality

August 18, 2009

When primates don’t get the same rewards as their peers, they often refuse them. A Georgia State University researcher is exploring why this reaction happens, and how reactions to inequality have evolved in related species, including humans.

Assistant Professor Sarah Brosnan has received a five-year, $677,462 grant for this research as part of the National Science Foundation’s Faculty Early Career Development (CAREER) program, aimed at supporting junior faculty contributions to research and education.

Brosnan has researched how respond when receiving a less valuable reward than their partners. The CAREER award is helping Brosnan follow up on this research in several ways.

“I’m really interested in the factors that lead to the development of their responses,” she said. “For instance, do the responses require human interaction, or do they respond similarly when a machine gives the rewards?”

There are fundamental differences in whether a primate’s expectations of rewards are based on what a partner or someone else in their group received, or if those expectation happens because of a non-social reason. The research will also look at social and individual factors affecting responses, including individuals’ personality and relationships.

“We’re also interested in how behavior affects their responses, for instance whether responses vary depending on whether the group fights a lot or grooms a lot,” she said. “We will also try to test everyone in a group with everyone else to see whether the primates respond differently to different individuals.”

The research will hopefully answer questions about the evolution of responses to reward — including those responses in humans.

“This behavior has been demonstrated in capuchins and , which might indicate that there is a long evolutionary history,” Brosnan said. “But it also might indicate that species that live in tolerant social groups, and cooperate — like capuchins, chimpanzees and humans — develop these behaviors because of environmental or social constraints, and not because a common ancestor shared them.”

An open question which researchers are trying to answer is whether humans' cooperative and social behaviors emerged due to the complexities of society and the brain, or if there are evolutionary similarities between humans and other species, including non-human primates.

“These behaviors did emerge through the process of evolution, as all traits do, but the question is whether or not there are precursors to these behaviors present in other species,” she said. “By looking at other species, we can begin to address this question.”

Undergraduate and graduate students and postdoctoral fellows will have an opportunity to work in Brosnan’s lab on the research project. The award is funded under the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009.

Provided by Georgia State University (news : web)

Explore further: Researchers shed light on trading behavior in animals -- and humans

Related Stories

Why don't chimpanzees like to barter commodities?

January 30, 2008

For thousands of years, human beings have relied on commodity barter as an essential aspect of their lives. It is the behavior that allows specialized professions, as one individual gives up some of what he has reaped to ...

Human-like altruism shown in chimpanzees

June 25, 2007

Debates about altruism are often based on the assumption that it is either unique to humans or else the human version differs from that of other animals in important ways. Thus, only humans are supposed to act on behalf of ...

Early humans on the menu

February 27, 2006

It is a widely accepted view in both research and popular literature: our ancient ancestors were hunters; aggressive, competitive and natural killers. This “Man the Hunter” idea has long influenced our understanding of ...

Primates expect others to act rationally

September 6, 2007

When trying to understand someone's intentions, non-human primates expect others to act rationally by performing the most appropriate action allowed by the environment, according to a new study by researchers at Harvard University.

Recommended for you

Gene editing in the brain gets a major upgrade

October 19, 2017

Genome editing technologies have revolutionized biomedical science, providing a fast and easy way to modify genes. However, the technique allowing scientists to carryout the most precise edits, doesn't work in cells that ...


Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.