In Search of Antimatter Galaxies

August 17, 2009
The Alpha Magnetic Spectrometer. Image courtesy MIT.

NASA's space shuttle program is winding down. With only about half a dozen more flights, shuttle crews will put the finishing touches on the International Space Station (ISS), bringing to an end twelve years of unprecedented orbital construction. The icon and workhorse of the American space program will have finished its Great Task.

But, as Apple's CEO Steve Jobs might say, there is one more thing...

An act of Congress in 2008 added another flight to the schedule near the end of the program. Currently scheduled for 2010, this extra flight of the shuttle is going to launch a hunt for galaxies.

The device that does the actual hunting is called the Alpha Magnetic Spectrometer--or AMS for short. It's a $1.5 billion cosmic ray detector that the shuttle will deliver to the ISS.

In addition to sensing distant galaxies made entirely of antimatter, the AMS will also test leading theories of dark matter, an invisible and mysterious substance that comprises 83 percent of the matter in the universe. And it will search for strangelets, a theoretical form of matter that's ultra-massive because it contains so-called strange quarks. Better understanding of strangelets will help scientists to study microquasars and tiny, primordial as they evaporate, thus proving whether these small black holes even exist.

All of these exotic phenomena can make their presence known by the ultra-high energy they emit--the type of particles AMS excels in detecting.

"For the first time, AMS will measure very high-energy cosmic rays very accurately," explains Nobel laureate Samuel Ting, a physicist at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, who conceived of the AMS and has guided its development since 1995.

An aerial view of CERN, the European Organization for Nuclear Research. The Alpha Magnetic Spectrometer is a sort of "mini-CERN" in space. Image credit: CERN

Antimatter galaxies, dark matter, strangelets--these are just the phenomena that scientists already know about. If history is any guide, the most exciting discoveries will be things that nobody has ever imagined. Just as radio telescopes and infrared telescopes once revealed cosmic phenomena that had been invisible to traditional optical telescopes, AMS will open up another facet of the cosmos for exploration.

"We will be exploring whole new territories," Ting says. "The possibility for discovery is off the charts."

Ting often compares AMS with high-powered particle accelerators at facilities such as CERN in Geneva, Switzerland. Rather than detecting high-speed cosmic rays from across the galaxy, these underground accelerators make their own particles locally using tremendous amounts of electrical power. To study the particles, CERN and AMS employ the same basic trick: Both use strong magnetic fields to deflect the particles, and arrays of silicon plates and other sensors inside the detectors track the particles' curved paths.

Many terabytes of data pour out of these sensors, and supercomputers crunch that data to infer each particle's mass, energy, and electric charge. The supercomputer is part of why AMS must be mounted onto the ISS rather than being a free-flying satellite. AMS produces far too much data to beam down to Earth, so it must carry an onboard supercomputer with 650 CPUs to do the number crunching in orbit. Partly because of this giant computer, AMS requires 2.5 kilowatts of power — far more than a normal satellite's solar panels can provide, but well within the space station's 100 kilowatt power supply.

"AMS is basically an all-purpose particle detector moved into space," Ting says.

There are two important differences between AMS and underground accelerators, though. First, AMS will detect particles such as heavy nuclei that have vastly higher energies than particle accelerators can muster. The most powerful particle accelerator in the world, the Large Hadron Collider at CERN, can collide particles with a combined energy of about 7 tera-electronvolts (TeV, a common way to measure energy in particle physics). In contrast, cosmic rays can have energies of 100 million TeV or more. The other important difference is that accelerators smash particles into each other to learn about the particles themselves, while AMS will sample high-energy particles from deep space for the sake of learning more about the cosmos.

For example, a longstanding mystery in cosmology is the case of the missing antimatter. According to physicists' best models, the Big Bang should have produced just as much antimatter as matter. So, where did all the antimatter go? It can't be nearby, because if it were, we would see bright X-ray emissions where the antimatter came into contact with matter and annihilated.

An artist's concept of the Alpha Magnetic Spectrometer installed on the International Space Station.

One explanation could be that some distant galaxies are made entirely of antimatter instead of matter. Since antimatter doesn't look any different than ordinary matter, astronomers would not be able to tell whether a distant galaxy is made of matter or antimatter just by looking at it. However, AMS would find strong evidence of antimatter galaxies if it detected even a single nucleus of anti-helium or a heavier antimatter element.

Collisions among cosmic rays near Earth can produce antimatter particles, but the odds of these collisions producing an intact anti-helium nucleus are so vanishingly small that finding even one anti-helium nucleus would strongly suggest that the nucleus had drifted to Earth from a distant region of the universe dominated by antimatter.

Other instruments such as the Italian PAMELA satellite have looked for anti-helium nuclei, but none have been sensitive enough to rule out the existence of antimatter galaxies. AMS has about 200 times the particle-collecting power of anything that has flown before. If AMS detects no anti-helium nuclei, Ting says scientists will know that there are no antimatter galaxies within about 1000 megaparsecs — or roughly to the edge of the observable universe.

Another mystery that AMS will help solve is the nature of dark matter. Scientists know that the vast majority of the universe is actually made of unseen dark matter rather than ordinary matter. They just don't know what dark matter is. A leading theory is that dark matter is made of a particle called the neutralino. Collisions between neutralinos should produce a large number of high-energy positrons, so AMS could prove whether dark matter is made of neutralinos by looking for this excess of energetic positrons.

"For the first time we could find out what is made of," Ting says.

Source: by Patrick Barry, Science@NASA

Explore further: Searching for primordial antimatter

Related Stories

Searching for primordial antimatter

October 30, 2008

Scientists are on the hunt for evidence of antimatter - matter's arch nemesis – left over from the very early Universe. New results using data from NASA's Chandra X-ray Observatory and Compton Gamma Ray Observatory suggest ...

What is antimatter and why does it matter?

September 22, 2005

The place is England. The year is 1928. One of the founding theorists of quantum mechanics, Paul Dirac, is scratching his head because solutions to his equations have yielded unexpected results. For the solutions to make ...

Pamela Goes to Space to Explore Dark Matter and Antimatter

June 13, 2006

Searching for antimatter and dark matter in Space: this is Pamela’s mission. Pamela will be launched into orbit on June 15th from the cosmodrome of Baikonur, in Kazakhstan. The launch will take place at 11.00 am local time.

Why matter matters in the universe

March 28, 2008

A new physics discovery explores why there is more matter than antimatter in the universe. The latest research findings, which involved significant contributions from physicists at the University of Melbourne, have been recently ...

Recommended for you

New type of electron lens for next-generation colliders

October 18, 2017

Sending bunches of protons speeding around a circular particle collider to meet at one specific point is no easy feat. Many different collider components work keep proton beams on course—and to keep them from becoming unruly.


Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

3.5 / 5 (4) Aug 18, 2009
Yet another leap into the unknown. It's things like these that make me glad to be human.

Anti-matter galaxies took my interest and got me wondering if they could contain life made of organic anti-matter. These will prove to be a challenge if humans ever want to explore them without blowing themselves up.
2.6 / 5 (5) Aug 18, 2009
Very good. I hope this research will accelerate development of more powerfull antimatter weapons in near future. It's things like these that make me glad to be soldier.
3 / 5 (2) Aug 19, 2009
This is another reason to extend the mission-life of the ISS. I don't know if it will find any antimatter galaxies, or stranglets, but I am pretty certain this detector will find new and interesting data.
1 / 5 (3) Aug 19, 2009
"Another mystery that AMS will help solve is the nature of dark matter. Scientists know that the vast majority of the universe is actually made of unseen dark matter rather than ordinary matter...."

If they "know" that dark matter makes up most of the mass of the universe then they are just consensus scientists, i.e. the leaders of a religious cult, and are not worth their salt. It's just a THEORY, not unlike Jesus walking on water.
Aug 19, 2009
This comment has been removed by a moderator.
2 / 5 (4) Aug 20, 2009
There are not equal amounts of antimatter. Spontaneous symmetry breaking prevents this.
not rated yet Aug 20, 2009
In fact, mass of dark matter is sufficiently huge to embrace much larger amount of antimatter, then we are observing in form of ordinary matter.
not rated yet Aug 28, 2009
A Crayola 64 box could be a solar system destroyer in an anti-matter galaxy. I wonder who would win in a fight? Perhaps the true meaning of mutually assured destruction. lol
not rated yet Aug 30, 2009
Transcentity wondered about life in antimatter galaxies, well I believe my girlfriend may well be made of organic antimatter as she can destroy things by her mere touch alone, especially electrical

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.