Market-style incentives to increase school choice have opposite effect

July 15, 2009
Education professor Christopher Lubienski, left, and graduate student Peter Weitzel have found that a market-based approach to increasing school choice actually leads to fewer educational opportunities, particularly for disadvantaged students in urban areas. Credit: L. Brian Stauffer

A market-based approach to increasing school choice actually leads to fewer educational opportunities, particularly for disadvantaged students in urban areas, according to a University of Illinois expert in education.

As schools compete for to improve their market position, the demands of the market often trump specific educational policy goals such as increased equality and access to better-performing schools, according to Christopher Lubienski, a professor of educational organization and leadership at the U. of I. College of Education and primary author of the study published in the August issue of the American Journal of Education. The study examined school options in three major metropolitan areas.

"When there's competitive incentives for schools to recruit students, new market hierarchies form," Lubienski said. "Some schools consciously avoid riskier students because they see themselves as up-market, and therefore serve a more up-market clientele. That leaves riskier students marginalized and excluded from the better schools."

Lubienski said free-marketers have been touting school choice and markets in education for years as a way to level the socio-economic playing field. School choice was seen as a way of cutting across boundaries, of opening up private schools to students who ordinarily couldn't afford tuition or didn't live in wealthy districts. Competition for students was expected to generate greater educational opportunities, leading to more equitable access for students across varied, and often segregated, urban areas.

But now, according to Lubienski, there's evidence to question "this notion of an open market leveling the playing field." Market-based educational policies, he said, despite being implemented to alleviate social injustice in education, are actually helping to exacerbate inequality and erect further barriers for poorer students.

"We're seeing some evidence that schools are changing their behaviors in undesirable ways, as far as only serving specific populations and avoiding those other students who would be seen as a drag on that school's reputation," Lubienski said.

To study the effects of markets on school choice, Lubienski and co-authors Charisse Gulosino, a professor at Brown University, and Peter Weitzel, a graduate student at Illinois, conducted geo-spatial analyses of education markets in Detroit, New Orleans and Washington, D.C.

On paper, Lubienski said, the cities are very different, "but they're probably the most competitive urban markets in terms of school choice," he said.

"Unlike in, say, Des Moines, where people seem to accept the idea of a neighborhood school, parents in these cities expect to be able to choose from different options, so the schools there really do have to compete with each other to attract students."

All three cases showed that schools embraced patterns of exclusionary strategies to enhance market position, Lubienski said, including employing a ringing strategy where new and independent schools don't serve high-need areas, but instead remain on the periphery.

"That allows schools to target and recruit better students, rather than produce them," he said. "It's a strategy where they can still serve disadvantaged students, but they're only serving the disadvantaged students who have the most active families from that sub-group."

Another tactic is putting money into marketing at the expense of improving the curriculum.

"It's easier to put out advertisements and make it appear as if your school is one thing, rather than change what's actually happening in the school, which history has shown us is a very difficult thing to do," Lubienski said.

In New Orleans, which Lubienski describes as a "near-universal choice city - about as close as we can get to a true experiment in market-based education" - the lack of a public school system has amplified the problems of relying on the invisible hand of a self-regulating market.

"Lots of cities have charter schools and voucher programs, but there's usually a pretty strong public school system that's still the big player in the room and acts as a buffer," Lubienski said. "But after Hurricane Katrina, New Orleans really wiped the slate clean by firing all the teachers in the city and starting over with all the charter schools."

The brute-force application of markets to schools doesn't seem to be having the effect that school-choice advocates expected because education is "too fragmented to be a true market," Lubienski said, and schools "aren't responding the way free-marketers assumed they would."

"The generic model for markets in just doesn't seem to be working," he said.

Source: University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign (news : web)

Explore further: Public schools equal or better in math than private or charter schools

Related Stories

Drug testing in schools up

July 12, 2006

Higher funding and the lowering of legal constraints are encouraging more U.S. schools to test students for use of illegal drugs.

Attitude determines student success in rural schools

June 20, 2008

[B]Study investigates qualities of high-achieving schools[/B] While most of the country focuses on ACT scores, student-teacher ratio and rigorous curriculum to increase student success, it may be the commitment to excellence ...

Recommended for you

Plague likely a Stone Age arrival to central Europe

November 22, 2017

A team of researchers led by scientists at the Max Planck Institute for the Science of Human History has sequenced the first six European genomes of the plague-causing bacterium Yersinia pestis dating from the Late Neolithic ...

How to cut your lawn for grasshoppers

November 22, 2017

Picture a grasshopper landing randomly on a lawn of fixed area. If it then jumps a certain distance in a random direction, what shape should the lawn be to maximise the chance that the grasshopper stays on the lawn after ...

Ancient barley took high road to China

November 21, 2017

First domesticated 10,000 years ago in the Fertile Crescent of the Middle East, wheat and barley took vastly different routes to China, with barley switching from a winter to both a winter and summer crop during a thousand-year ...


Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

3 / 5 (2) Jul 15, 2009
An outcome which could, and in fact has been, predicted.
not rated yet Jul 15, 2009
It's not a free market when payment to the schools is extracted by force, when union policies and hiring practices are enforced and imposed by government, and licensing is also imposed by non-market forces...among other things.
not rated yet Jul 16, 2009
With the high cost of jumping government imposed hurdles in starting a school, I'm not surprised that the small schools needed to meet the needs of "riskier" students. But then perhaps, riskier students are those who disrupt classes, participate in criminal activities and are the type of students who need to be put in juvenile detention for the greater good anyway. This is often a result of parents not disciplining their children and teaching them to be responsible.

The comments regarding schools "...employing a ringing strategy where new and independent schools don't serve high-need areas" first make some unnamed assumptions about what are "high-need areas" ("disadvantaged" is mentioned whatever that is). Second, as businesses enter the market, they first go to where they are likely to find the most receptive market.
not rated yet Jul 18, 2009
Another way they are trying to destroy our economy and let evil rich men take over in a dictatorship. Will it take a civil war to do away with evil marketeers?
5 / 5 (1) Jul 20, 2009
Education is a right and must be supported by all of us FOR ALL of us. Privatizing education is blatantly just what it sounds like, making education a private industry, denying some citizens because they are poor and undermining our American way of life and the safety of our Democracy.
not rated yet Jul 20, 2009
Jimee says it all. Private "market" schools is just a technique for rich people to try to avoid having to pay a fair tax to support proper schools equally for all students. There's no such thing as equalty of opportunity without equal access to a consistent level of education.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.