EarthTalk: What is 'nanotechnology'?

May 25, 2009 By E/The Environmental Magazine

Dear EarthTalk: What is "nanotechnology"? I've heard that nanoparticles are already in consumer products, yet we haven't really studied their potential health impacts. (Dan Zeff, San Francisco)

makes use of minuscule objects -- whose width can be 10,000 times narrower than a human hair -- known as nanoparticles. Upwards of 600 products on store shelves today contain them, including transparent sunscreen, lipsticks, anti-aging creams and even food products.

Global nanotechnology sales have grown substantially in recent years, to $50 billion in 2007, according to Lux Research, author of the annual Nanotech Report. And the final tally isn't in yet, but analysts had predicted 2008 sales to be $150 billion. The National Science Foundation says the industry could be worth $1 trillion by 2015, when it would employ two million workers directly.

What makes nanoparticles so useful is their tiny size, which allows for manipulation of color, solubility, strength, magnetic behavior and . Nanoparticles do exist in nature, and they're also created inadvertently through some industrial processes. What's new -- and potentially hazardous -- is the widespread engineering of these particles for commercial purposes.

While there is no conclusive evidence that nanomaterials are either unsafe or not, health advocates worry that we're already putting them on our bodies and ingesting them as if they'd been thoroughly tested and proven safe. Animal studies, including one with rats at the University of Rochester, have shown that some nanoparticles can cross the blood-brain barrier, which protects the brain from toxins in the . And inhaled nanoparticles have also harmed the lungs of animal test subjects.

Despite these and other studies, nanomaterials are virtually unregulated in the U.S. And of $1.3 billion budgeted for research in 2006, only $38 million went to examining risks to health and to the environment.

"While the benefits of nanotechnology are widely publicized, the discussion of the potential effects of their widespread use in consumer and industrial products is just beginning to emerge," reports the Journal of Nanobiotechnology. "Both pioneers of nanotechnology and its opponents are finding it extremely hard to argue their case as there is limited information available to support one side or the other."

Europe's regulators are far more wary about nanotechnology than their American counterparts. Britain's Royal Society recommended in 2004 that be viewed as brand new substances, and the European Commission is examining them on a case-by-case basis. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency is loosely charged with regulating nanotechnology here, but has barely dipped its toe in the water.

Taken together, the evidence suggests considerable uncertainty about the use of nano-ingredients in consumer products. It's just not known if they're safe, which begs the question: Why have we gone ahead and approved them for commercial use? Indeed, we may look back at our current decade and see it, for better or worse, as a time when tiny things caused big and momentous changes in our lives.


On the Net: EU's REACH Law, … each/reach_intro.htm ; U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Nanotechnology Page, .


(c) 2009, E/The Environmental Magazine
Distributed by McClatchy-Tribune Information Services.

Explore further: EPA wants nanotechnology studied

Related Stories

EPA wants nanotechnology studied

March 16, 2006

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency awarded grants worth $5 billion Thursday for a study of the health and environmental effects of nanotechnology.

Nanotoxicology - new branch of learning

August 30, 2004

Nanotechnology, the 'science of small things' is set to bring huge advantages in engineering, electronics, medicine and IT-- but the potential threats to health that widespread use of nanoparticles could bring need to be ...

Nanotech in your vitamins

January 14, 2009

The ability of the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to regulate the safety of dietary supplements using nanomaterials is severely limited by lack of information, lack of resources and the agency's lack of statutory authority ...

Recommended for you

The microscopic origin of efficiency droop in LEDs

November 21, 2017

Light-emitting diodes—or LEDs, as they are commonly known—have been slowly replacing incandescent light bulbs in applications ranging from car taillights to indicators on electronics since their invention in the 1960s.

Borophene shines alone as 2-D plasmonic material

November 20, 2017

An atom-thick film of boron could be the first pure two-dimensional material able to emit visible and near-infrared light by activating its plasmons, according to Rice University scientists.


Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

not rated yet May 25, 2009
you assume too much. Just because this word and simular references are widely banded about by university lecturers and students this again is hype rather than reality.
not rated yet May 26, 2009
did you even read the article?
not rated yet May 26, 2009
The word 'Nano' reminds me of another one from the fifties 'Atomic'. It was used as a promotion in ads and also they thought it's harmless too. :)
not rated yet May 26, 2009
Well the little difference between Atomic and Nano, is Nano is the current scale we can visually see, and analyze the substance, Atomic is a little more difficult since its scale is far smaller then even Nano.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.