Offsetting perceptions: Firms use charitable giving to clean up their international reputation

April 2, 2009,

British multinationals operating in countries that lack basic human rights give around 70% more money to charity than firms that do not have a presence in such politically controversial nations, a new study has revealed.

The findings support the growing body of research suggesting that corporate charitable giving plays an important strategic role for many businesses.

In a study looking at the charitable donations of 305 UK plcs, comprising around half of FTSE All-Share Index companies, analysts found that a corporate presence in one or more countries in which political rights and civil liberties are curtailed pushed up the average level of donations from £1.148m to £1.977m.

Writing in the Journal of Management Studies, the researchers suggest that this increased philanthropy could be seen as an attempt to "offset" negative connotations related to the companies' operations in controversial countries such as China, Burma, Sudan and the Democratic Republic of Congo.

"The positive impact on charitable giving is restricted to a presence in only those countries that are most lacking in political rights and civil liberties," said Dr Stephen Pavelin, of Henley Business School, UK, part of the team who carried out the research. "Our findings suggest that companies are seeking to offset negative impressions in the eyes of the public that arise from doing business in such countries by making greater gifts to charity."

The study drew information from the companies' annual reports from 2002 and looked at presence in 'countries of concern', as defined by criteria established by the FTSE4Good Index - which aims to identify environmentally and socially responsible companies - as well as indicators of political rights, civil liberties and corruption derived from research by the independent organisations Freedom House and Transparency International.

Unable to separate out corporate giving by country, the team could not determine whether the higher levels of charitable donations were directed towards projects in the UK or in the host countries themselves. "This finding is perhaps indicative of relatively token responses to corporate exposure to political and civil rights issues, rather than significant attempts to address or atone for these issues through giving aimed at impacted communities," said Dr Pavelin.

While political and civil rights issues were shown to stimulate charitable donations, level of corruption did not have a similar effect. "It appears that the salient feature of a country in this connection is a lack of political rights and/or civil liberties, rather than a presence of high levels of corruption," said Dr Pavelin.

No evidence was found of a link between money donated to charity and the fact that firms operated in a number of different countries. Multinationals make similar contributions to their 'uni-national' counterparts, the study found.

"It is clear that the characteristics of the countries within which companies operate play a more significant role in shaping corporate social performance than the degree of internationalisation per se," said Dr Pavelin.

Source: Wiley (news : web)

Explore further: Transparency in politics can lead to greater corruption

Related Stories

Transparency in politics can lead to greater corruption

October 10, 2008

Why are some countries more prone to political corruption? Viviana Stechina from Uppsala University, Sweden, has investigated why corruption among the political elite was more extensive in Argentina than in Chile during ...

Corporate social responsibility: less profit, more value

February 7, 2008

Companies that operate in a socially responsible manner 'pay' for this with a loss in financial profit. Yet at the same time, socially responsible business practices can enhance a company's value. Dutch economist Lammertjan ...

Political views affect firms' corporate social responsibility

September 17, 2008

A new study in The Financial Review establishes a relationship between political beliefs of corporate stakeholders and the corporate social responsibility (CSR) of their firms. Companies with a high CSR rating tend to be ...

Cooperation, punishment and revenge

March 6, 2008

Research from The University of Nottingham has shed new light on the way in which people co-operate for the common good — and what happens when they don’t.

Recommended for you

Study: Social media sways exercise motivation

January 17, 2019

It's January – a time when students are looking for that extra bit of oomph. For some, time spent on social media might provide the necessary inspiration to get up and exercising – but that time can come with consequences, ...

1 comment

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

not rated yet Apr 02, 2009
Wow, that's why corporate philanthropy is nothing more than marketing BS. Why do people believe that a corporation can actually have good intentions?

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.