Research Raises Questions About ‘Policing for Profit’

July 29, 2008

( -- If a police officer stops a motorist and discovers cash and narcotics during the stop, the officer may have the authority to confiscate the car as an instrument of crime and the money as probable proceeds of criminal activity.

Asset forfeiture laws allow governments to seize citizens’ private property, including real estate, vehicles and currency, if they are tied to illegal conduct. Although the laws dictating who will receive the proceeds vary from state to state, critics have long contended that these laws lead to “policing for profit.”

UT Dallas criminologists John Worrall and Tom Kovandzic have completed one of the only studies that looks at the application of asset forfeiture laws and whether the laws affect the goals and actions of police departments. The study titled, “Is Policing for Profit? Answers from Asset Forfeiture” is published in the most recent issue of Criminology and Public Policy.

Worrall and Kovandzic, both criminology professors in the School of Economic, Political and Policy Sciences, analyzed 572 police departments around the country to look at the big picture of how asset forfeiture laws might influence policing. Their data came from the Law Enforcement Management and Administrative Statistics survey and the U.S. Justice Department Asset Forfeiture Program.

Worrall and Kovandzic found that money does matter. The prospect of receiving money may drive forfeiture activities. This finding was consistent, regardless of the varying state regulations regarding the division of the proceeds. Even in the most restrictive states, police departments can get back up to 80 percent of the proceeds by working with the federal government in a process called equitable sharing.

These findings are timely as rising gas prices and a changing economy leave police departments faced with growing budget constraints. “As agencies become more desperate, there’s the potential for the situation to worsen. We could see a lot more interest in creative sources of funding,” said Worrall.

Despite the findings that policing for profit does exist and is an increasing occurrence, Worrall and Kovandzic point out that it remains a potentially effective tool for drug enforcement. “Forfeiture revenues are often pumped back into drug task forces. It’s hard to fault law enforcement agencies for using the law to their advantage to wage an expensive war on drugs,” said Worrall.

Provided by University of Texas at Dallas

Explore further: RI to get $230M from $500M Google forfeiture

Related Stories

RI to get $230M from $500M Google forfeiture

April 2, 2012

(AP) -- Rhode Island law enforcement agencies that participated in an investigation that resulted in Google Inc. forfeiting $500 million last year will receive $230 million of that money, federal officials said Monday.

Smaller cities across US opening high-tech crime centers

May 24, 2016

Michelle Plante scoured a surveillance video for clues, trying to identify the man seen shooting at someone in a Hartford playground recently in broad daylight. Luckily, no children were there, and the man fled into a nearby ...

Move to online public notices looms over papers

May 22, 2009

(AP) -- The tough economy means the growing suburb of Apex can't replace some computers and police vehicles. So the town's mayor is pleased to save $13,000 by posting public notices of rezoning requests and major land development ...

Reddit co-founder Aaron Swartz dies at 26

January 13, 2013

A co-founder of Reddit and activist who fought to make online content free to the public has been found dead, authorities confirmed Saturday, prompting an outpouring of grief from prominent voices on the intersection of free ...

Recommended for you

Averaging the wisdom of crowds

December 12, 2017

The best decisions are made on the basis of the average of various estimates, as confirmed by the research of Dennie van Dolder and Martijn van den Assem, scientists at VU Amsterdam. Using data from Holland Casino promotional ...

1 comment

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

not rated yet Jul 31, 2008
These laws are a deadly attack against democracy, private property, and innocent property owners. Too often once police gain control over property innocent owners and individuals adjudged innocent spend huge sums to regain their property. New Orleans, after several court rulings directing them to return property, still refuses to return firearms, automobiles, and real property. These laws are an abomination. Don't drive a motor vehicle the local cops like through Louisiana if you're a minority, young, or poor. Even some rich folks have had to go through federal court to reclaim vehicles and cash seized as "drug related" even when no drugs were found. Besides, dirty cops often drop a nickel bag and take your car. These laws empower the bad guys in law enforcement. Supervisors are reluctant to finger the bad cops because they're bringing in money and "toys" to the agency.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.