NASA Plans to Visit the Sun

June 10, 2008
NASA Plans to Visit the Sun
A simulated view of the Sun illustrating the trajectory of Solar Probe+ during its multiple near-Sun passes.

For more than 400 years, astronomers have studied the sun from afar. Now NASA has decided to go there. "We are going to visit a living, breathing star for the first time," says program scientist Lika Guhathakurta of NASA Headquarters. "This is an unexplored region of the solar system and the possibilities for discovery are off the charts."

The name of the mission is Solar Probe+ (pronounced "Solar Probe plus"). It's a heat-resistant spacecraft designed to plunge deep into the sun's atmosphere where it can sample solar wind and magnetism first hand. Launch could happen as early as 2015. By the time the mission ends 7 years later, planners believe Solar Probe+ will solve two great mysteries of astrophysics and make many new discoveries along the way.

The probe is still in its early design phase, called "pre-phase A" at NASA headquarters, says Guhathakurta. "We have a lot of work to do, but it's very exciting."

Johns Hopkins' Applied Physics Lab (APL) will design and build the spacecraft for NASA. APL already has experience sending probes toward the sun. APL's MESSENGER spacecraft completed its first flyby of the planet Mercury in January 2008 and many of the same heat-resistant technologies will fortify Solar Probe+. (Note: The mission is called Solar Probe plus because it builds on an earlier 2005 APL design called Solar Probe.)

At closest approach, Solar Probe+ will be 7 million km or 9 solar radii from the sun. There, the spacecraft's carbon-composite heat shield must withstand temperatures greater than 1400o C and survive blasts of radiation at levels not experienced by any previous spacecraft. Naturally, the probe is solar powered; it will get its electricity from liquid-cooled solar panels that can retract behind the heat-shield when sunlight becomes too intense. From these near distances, the Sun will appear 23 times wider than it does in the skies of Earth.

The two mysteries prompting this mission are the high temperature of the sun's corona and the puzzling acceleration of the solar wind:

Mystery #1—the corona: If you stuck a thermometer in the surface of the sun, it would read about 6000o C. Intuition says the temperature should drop as you back away; instead, it rises. The sun's outer atmosphere, the corona, registers more than a million degrees Celsius, hundreds of times hotter than the star below. This high temperature remains a mystery more than 60 years after it was first measured.

Mystery #2—the solar wind: The sun spews a hot, million mph wind of charged particles throughout the solar system. Planets, comets, asteroids—they all feel it. Curiously, there is no organized wind close to the sun's surface, yet out among the planets there blows a veritable gale. Somewhere in between, some unknown agent gives the solar wind its great velocity. The question is, what?

"To solve these mysteries, Solar Probe+ will actually enter the corona," says Guhathakurta. "That's where the action is."

The payload consists mainly of instruments designed to sense the environment right around the spacecraft—e.g., a magnetometer, a plasma wave sensor, a dust detector, electron and ion analyzers and so on. "In-situ measurements will tell us what we need to know to unravel the physics of coronal heating and solar wind acceleration," she says.

Solar Probe+'s lone remote sensing instrument is the Hemispheric Imager. The "HI" for short is a telescope that will make 3D images of the sun's corona similar to medical CAT scans. The technique, called coronal tomography, is a fundamentally new approach to solar imaging and is only possible because the photography is performed from a moving platform close to the sun, flying through coronal clouds and streamers and imaging them as it flies by and through them.

With a likely launch in May 2015, Solar Probe+ will begin its prime mission near the end of Solar Cycle 24 and finish near the predicted maximum of Solar Cycle 25 in 2022. This would allow the spacecraft to sample the corona and solar wind at many different phases of the solar cycle. It also guarantees that Solar Probe+ will experience a good number of solar storms near the end of its mission. While perilous, this is according to plan: Researchers suspect that many of the most dangerous particles produced by solar storms are energized in the corona—just where Solar Probe+ will be. Solar Probe+ may be able to observe the process in action and show researchers how to forecast Solar Energetic Particle (SEP) events that threaten the health and safety of astronauts.

Solar Probe+'s repeated plunges into the corona will be accomplished by means of Venus flybys. The spacecraft will swing by Venus seven times in six years to bend the probe’s trajectory deeper and deeper into the sun’s atmosphere. Bonus: Although Venus is not a primary target of the mission, astronomers may learn new things about the planet when the heavily-instrumented probe swings by.

"Solar Probe+ is an extraordinary mission of exploration, discovery and deep understanding," says Guhathakurta. "We can't wait to get started."

Source: Science@NASA, by Dr. Tony Phillips

Explore further: The missing mass—what is causing a geoid low in the Indian Ocean?

Related Stories

Solar antics

September 20, 2017

The sun's recent activity has caught the interest of scientists and space weather forecasters worldwide, highlighting the need to keep a watchful eye on our star and its awesome power.

A day in the life of NASA's Voyagers

September 19, 2017

At more than 10 billion miles away from Earth, there is no day and night. Time and space are fathomless and our Sun is a distant point of starlight—a faint reminder of the home NASA's twin Voyagers, humanity's farthest ...

The cosmic water trail uncovered by Herschel

September 19, 2017

During almost four years of observing the cosmos, the Herschel Space Observatory traced out the presence of water. With its unprecedented sensitivity and spectral resolution at key wavelengths, Herschel revealed this crucial ...

Recommended for you

A solar-powered asteroid nursery at the orbit of Mars

October 18, 2017

The planet Mars shares its orbit with a handful of small asteroids, the so-called Trojans. Among them, one finds a unique group, all moving in very similar orbits, suggesting that they originated from the same object. But ...


Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

5 / 5 (4) Jun 10, 2008
And here's the same article released just over a month ago on another website.

3.3 / 5 (4) Jun 10, 2008
"Launch could happen as early as 2015."

3.7 / 5 (9) Jun 10, 2008
The answer to both questions has to be "energy comes from Sun's magnetic fields rearranging violently", after all thats what drives protuberances afair. Corona probably stays hotter due to lower density and therefore heat conductance.

BTW I love our Sun! It is The Sole Creator of our World and human race, it keeps on feeding us the precious Energy and without it we won't last long! The Sun God is the only god whose cult makes scientific sense. Praise the Sun!
3 / 5 (4) Jun 10, 2008
i predict this solar mission gets scrapped when they realize how utterly absurd/difficult it is to design something any moer complex than a giant rock to withstand this heat. they'd be better of just sending some sattelites to the lagrangian points and having them get a 3d-full circle real time view of the sun, and possibly a sattelite in a polar orbit of the sun too, sending soemthing so close is just dumb becuase it will just burn up.
4 / 5 (2) Jun 10, 2008
I predict that this project will recieve huge public support and phat grants from every direction when the sun fries all our sattelites out of the sky around 2012.

I also agree with the "whipping" magnetic field theory.
4 / 5 (2) Jun 10, 2008
"If you stuck a thermometer in the surface of the sun, it would read about 6000o C. Intuition says the temperature should drop as you back away; instead, it rises. The sun's outer atmosphere, the corona, registers more than a million degrees Celsius."

So, why not send a probe in to orbit just above the surface? Shielding wouldn't burn up as quickly. Imagine getting a close-up photo or video of a solar flare. Awesome.
4 / 5 (2) Jun 10, 2008
I hadnt thought of that, Now I wonder if theyre going to put a badasss camera onboard for some serious solar closeups.
3.8 / 5 (4) Jun 10, 2008
um yea, get even closer to the sun, bad idea: here's why.. the density of heat is much great as you get closer to the sun, cornoal temperature notwithstanding:
the temperature of the exosphere is actually quite high at a certain point high up enough, becuae the particles are really fast becuaset they don't slow down by bumping into each other.....but if you go up there, you'll radiate heat faster than these particles provide you heat through convection, same thing with being closer to the sun, it's effectively much more survivable in the corona than the surface of the sun.
it's not how hot something is, it's how much heat that thing has and how much of that heat can be transferred to you htat you must worry about.
4 / 5 (2) Jun 10, 2008
I think what you're trying to say is the density of particles is greater nearer the sun, so heat transfers more quickly. That's a good point. I suggest, however, that there's a sweet spot ABOVE the surface where temperature is relatively low and plasma density doesn't cancel that out.
4.7 / 5 (3) Jun 10, 2008
They can't get a shovel to work on Mars and now they're getting funding together to send measurements back from the sun? These guys have some brass ones.
not rated yet Jun 10, 2008
Exactly zevkirsh.

Temperature is the measurement of the average speed of the particles (and molecules) a given volume of space. It says nothing about the density of those particles. As an example of this (kinda), think about steam and water. If both are at 100 C, which feels hotter? The water does, because it can transfer far more heat to you per second than steam can, even though they both have the same temp.

It's the same way with the corona and the photosphere. Technically, yes, the photosphere is colder, but you'll be encountering a far greater number of particles there than you would in the corona. So the question becomes, which is better, being hit by a few super high energy particles, or being hit by reams of slightly less energetic particles?

Also remember that you're having to deal with direct EM radiation from the sun as well, not just energetic particles. EM radiation density should decrease by the square power as you travel further away from the photosphere. Still thales, I kinda wonder that bit about a sweet spot too.
1 / 5 (1) Jun 11, 2008
"the solar wind: The sun spews a hot, million mph wind of charged particles throughout the solar system."

the speed of light is but 186 000 mph, so??? is there something i must know....
5 / 5 (4) Jun 11, 2008
its per second i see, sorry phys org!
5 / 5 (2) Jun 12, 2008
They can't get a shovel to work on Mars and now they're getting funding together to send measurements back from the sun?

I think that Icarus would be a more suiting name for the probe -:)
5 / 5 (2) Jun 12, 2008
Why don't they just go at night?


Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.