Should Humans Give Overheated Species a Lift?

Jan 24, 2007

As the Earth warms up (2006 was the hottest year on record in America and the hottest in Britain since 1659), ecologists expect many plants and animals to move up, too -- up north and uphill, to locations where temperatures are more to their liking.

UC Davis ecologist Mark Schwartz is one of the first scientists to ask publicly a question that's been a topic of insider conversation for some time: Should humans give those migrations a helping hand?

"Global warming is predicted to threaten a large number of our plants and animals with extinction. One obvious solution is to help species at risk move to new environments where they may thrive," says Schwartz, a professor of environmental science and policy and director of the UC Davis Center for Population Biology.

"However, our experience with costly unintended consequences of biological invasions should give us pause before embarking on such a mission."

A good example of an animal already shifting its habitat because of climate change is the Edith's checkerspot butterfly (Euphydryas editha wrighti). Found in California's Sierra Nevada mountain range, the butterfly has moved in the past 25 years from lower elevations to higher ones, and from southern locations to northern ones.

Schwartz and two colleagues at University of Notre Dame have written the first major scientific paper on the subject of "assisted migration." Titled "A Framework for Debate of Assisted Migration in an Era of Climate Change," it will appear soon in Conservation Biology, the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology. His co-authors are assistant professors Jason McLachlan and Jessica Hellmann.

Today's New York Times discusses the issues in a story by science writer Carl Zimmer titled "A Radical Step to Preserve a Species: Assisted Migration." In it, an expert on global warming and extinctions calls Schwartz's Conservation Biology paper a "breakthrough" for framing the assisted migration debate.

Schwartz also is quoted in a news story in the January-March 2007 issue of Conservation magazine, a general-audience publication of The Society for Conservation Biology. In "When Worlds Collide," science writer Douglas Fox quotes Schwartz as saying that while biologists might decide a species should be moved, "It is much harder to find people who want to bring these outside species into their communities."

Fox continues: "Schwartz acknowledges that people will inevitably resort to assisted migration to rescue some species, but he hopes that guidelines can be developed to regulate the practice."

Source: UC Davis

Explore further: EPA staff says agency needs to be tough on smog

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Endangered delicacy: Japan eel on species red list

Jun 13, 2014

(AP)—The Japanese eel, a popular summertime delicacy that has become prohibitively expensive due to overfishing, has been put on the international conservation "red list" in a move that may speed up Japan's ...

Landowners key to preserving Prairie Pothole habitat

May 30, 2014

(Phys.org) —A survey of Midwest landowners will help policymakers find ways to further incentivize conservation of wetlands and grasslands in the Prairie Pothole Region, according to Larry Gigliotti, assistant unit leader ...

Recommended for you

Shell files new plan to drill in Arctic

20 hours ago

Royal Dutch Shell has submitted a new plan for drilling in the Arctic offshore Alaska, more than one year after halting its program following several embarrassing mishaps.

Reducing water scarcity possible by 2050

21 hours ago

Water scarcity is not a problem just for the developing world. In California, legislators are currently proposing a $7.5 billion emergency water plan to their voters; and U.S. federal officials last year ...

User comments : 0