Whooping crane eggs: one or two?

Nov 22, 2005

A University of Alberta scientist says removing an egg from an endangered whooping crane's nest increases the species chances of survival.

Mark Boyce, from the Faculty of Science, studied the policy of removing one of two whooping crane eggs from a nest at Canada's Wood Buffalo National Park and raising it in a "foster-parenting" program.

Cranes usually rear a single chick and the other dies or is killed by predators. The egg removal program was started by Ernie Kuyt, an Edmonton-based scientist who reasoned that one egg could be taken and used for artificial propagation programs.

But the Canadian government prefers no future egg collections occur in the national park due to concerns that egg removals may reduce the productivity of the whooping crane population.

Boyce says his research found taking one egg away actually increases the probability of nest success.

His paper -- co-authored by Subhash Lele of the university's mathematical and statistical sciences department and Brian Johns of the Canadian Wildlife Service-- appears in the December issue of Biological Conservation.

Copyright 2005 by United Press International

Explore further: Earlier Stone Age artifacts found in Northern Cape of South Africa

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Recommended for you

Affirmative action elicits bias in pro-equality Caucasians

14 hours ago

New research from Simon Fraser University's Beedie School of Business indicates that bias towards the effects of affirmative action exists in not only people opposed to it, but also in those who strongly endorse equality.

Narcissistic CEOs and financial performance

Jul 24, 2014

Narcissism, considered by some as the "dark side of the executive personality," may actually be a good thing when it comes to certain financial measures, with companies led by narcissistic CEOs outperforming those helmed ...

Election surprises tend to erode trust in government

Jul 24, 2014

When asked who is going to win an election, people tend to predict their own candidate will come out on top. When that doesn't happen, according to a new study from the University of Georgia, these "surprised losers" often ...

User comments : 0