Early sunflower family fossil found in South America

Sep 28, 2010 by Lin Edwards report
Fossil Asteraceae. Image credit: Science, DOI:10.1126/science.1193108

(PhysOrg.com) -- A beautifully preserved fossil identified as being of an early relative of the Asteraceae, or aster, family nearly 50 million years old suggests the plant family, which has now colonized much of the planet, originated in South America after Gondwana separated, forming South America, Australia, Africa, Antarctica and India.

Researcher Dr. Viviana Barreda and colleagues of the Argentinian Museum of National Sciences in Buenos Aires found the perfectly preserved of two flowering heads in the north-west Pategonia region, in rocks along the river Picheleufu in what is now north-western Argentina, and dated it to 47.5 million years old. At the time the region was sub-tropical, with average temperatures of around 19°C.

Fossils of the Asteraceae are rare and most often only fossilized pollen grains are found, but the Patagonian fossil features two complete flowers complete with winged seeds, petals and the stems.

The most striking feature of the fossil, which resembles a painting of sunflowers by 19th century Dutch painter Van Gogh, is a dense (capitulum) like that forming the central part of a and providing a strong attraction for .

According to Barreda, the finding and dating of the fossil suggest the ancestor of the Asteraceae probably originated in southern Gondwana, in a region that is now part of southern South America, before effective dispersal barriers were established within this massive . It had been thought that the aster family originated from a common ancestor of the Asteraceae, Goodeniaceae and Calyceracea families in once-tropical Antarctica, migrating to Australia and South America as Antarctica cooled. Then, between 56 and 23 million years ago this in South America branched into the Asteraceae and Calyceraceae. The new finding provides confirmation for this hypothesis.

Dr. Tod Stuessy, a botanist with the University of Vienna, who wrote an accompanying article to Barreda’s paper, said the fossil was clear evidence of the existence of the sunflower family at its early stages of diversification.

Stuessy said little is known about the origins of the sunflower family and there is much still to learn about its evolution and how it colonized the rest of the planet so quickly or how the members of the family became so “incredibly diverse.”

The Asteraceae family is the most diverse family of flowering plants, and includes sunflowers, daisies, chrysanthemums, lettuce, and dandelions among its members. The family includes 20-30,000 species, and representatives are found on every continent with the exception of Antarctica.

The paper and article describing the results of two years of work on the fossil are published in the journal Science.

Explore further: Militants threaten ancient sites in Iraq, Syria

More information: Eocene Patagonia Fossils of the Daisy Family, V. D. Barreda, Science 24 September 2010: Vol. 329. no. 5999, p. 1621. DOI:10.1126/science.1193108

Related Stories

Ancient snakes living on Madagascar

Mar 31, 2010

"Blindsnakes are not very pretty, are rarely noticed, and are often mistaken for earthworms," admits Blair Hedges, professor of biology at Penn State University. "Nonetheless, they tell a very interesting ...

Researchers reveal ancient origins of modern opossum

Dec 16, 2009

A University of Florida researcher has co-authored a study tracing the evolution of the modern opossum back to the extinction of the dinosaurs and finding evidence to support North America as the center of ...

Can modern-day plants trace their New Zealand ancestry?

Jan 21, 2010

One hundred million years ago the earth looked very different from how it does today. Continents were joining and breaking apart, dinosaurs were roaming the earth, and flowering plants were becoming more widespread.

New theory on the origin of primates

Jan 19, 2010

A new model for primate origins is presented in Zoologica Scripta, published by the Norwegian Academy of Science and Letters and The Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences. The paper argues that the distributions of the major ...

Recommended for you

New hadrosaur noses into spotlight

1 hour ago

Call it the Jimmy Durante of dinosaurs – a newly discovered hadrosaur with a truly distinctive nasal profile. The new dinosaur, named Rhinorex condrupus by paleontologists from North Carolina State Univer ...

Militants threaten ancient sites in Iraq, Syria

8 hours ago

For more than 5,000 years, numerous civilizations have left their mark on upper Mesopotamia—from Assyrians and Akkadians to Babylonians and Romans. Their ancient, buried cities, palaces and temples packed ...

New branch added to European family tree

Sep 17, 2014

The setting: Europe, about 7,500 years ago. Agriculture was sweeping in from the Near East, bringing early farmers into contact with hunter-gatherers who had already been living in Europe for tens of thousands ...

User comments : 2

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

Going
not rated yet Sep 28, 2010
What was it that drove the that Asteraceae or Compositae to evolve their flower-heads formed of a fusion of separate individual flowers? Umbelliferae seem to do OK with loosely associated florets.
Djincs
not rated yet Sep 28, 2010
Good question, their strategy works prety well, this is obvious. I think when they make lots of little blooms put together in a.... something like basket,I dont know the world, like the dandelion, they put less energy in making big patel for every bloom and in the same time it is visible for the polinators(put lots of small together and they are big and visible), and when this polinator visit the basket it give its polen to every bloom(which are pretty small actually and if they are separated it will miss lots of them) in the basket in one visiting, and in the evolution every saving of energy(from doing lots of petals) makes the difference.The Umbellifere strategy is pretty much the same, 2 different solution but the result is pretty much the same.