Physicists investigate fate of five-dimensional black strings

Sep 10, 2010 By Lisa Zyga feature
This clip from the video below shows a five-dimensional black string evolving into a thinner string with a cascade of black holes. Eventually, the system will end in a naked singularity and finally become a five-dimensional black hole. Image credit: Frans Pretorius.

(PhysOrg.com) -- While black holes in four-dimensional space-time are stable and can persist for a long time, their higher-dimensional analogues are usually unstable. One such theoretical analogue is a five-dimensional black string, which is unstable to perturbations and tends to decay into different forms. But like all unstable "black objects," it's difficult to determine what the end state of the perturbed system might be. Using a new computer code, physicists have been able to simulate the evolution of five-dimensional black strings well beyond earlier studies, leading them to predict that the strings eventually turn into five-dimensional black holes.

The physicists, Luis Lehner from the Perimeter Institute for Theoretical Physics, the University of Guelph (both in Ontario, Canada), and the Canadian Institute for Advanced Research, along with Frans Pretorius from Princeton University, have published their study in a recent issue of .

The final fate of higher-dimensional black strings has been questioned many times since the early 1990s, when Gregory and Laflamme first realized that these objects are unstable (subject to what is now called the Gregory-Laflamme instability). At that time, Gregory and Laflamme conjectured that unstable black strings might eventually be “pinched off” at periodic intervals, resulting in a sequence of black holes. This idea fits with entropic considerations, since a sequence of black holes has higher entropy than a black string. However, some scientists later proved that black strings could not pinch off in a finite time as measured along the . This finding cast doubt on the possibility of a pinch-off that could be observed, and many scientists began investigating other possibilities.

One of the later conjectures, which was based on a , found that an unstable black string can evolve into a “necklace” of spherical black holes connected by black string segments. Although this evolution involves pinch-offs, it avoids the conclusions of the no-pinch-off proof due to a technical caveat. However, the code that was used for this investigation crashed before scientists could infer a final state.

In their new study, Lehner and Pretorius developed a new code that could extend this investigation without crashing. The simulation again showed the black string evolving into black holes connected by thin string segments. Since the string segments are themselves unstable, smaller black holes begin forming on these segments, and the pattern repeats on ever-smaller scales. As the self-similar cascade continues, smaller and smaller black holes form on the string segments and the string segments get thinner, until they are both arbitrarily small.

The researchers ran the simulation until they had to stop due to high computational requirements. But the simulations revealed enough to allow the physicists to estimate that the cascade will terminate at a finite time. As they explained, the curvature of the black holes increases as the string radius decreases, which leads to a naked singularity.

This video is not supported by your browser at this time.
This animation shows a black string evolving into black holes connected by thin string segments. Smaller black holes form on the unstable string segments, resulting in a cascade that leads to a naked singularity before ending as a black hole. Credit: Frans Pretorius.

If quantum gravity resolves this singularity, several black holes should emerge. Then, small in the extra dimension would cause these to merge into one black hole, which would be the final state of the black string.

The result is especially interesting because it could violate the cosmic censorship hypothesis. Formulated in 1969 by Roger Penrose, the cosmic censorship hypothesis says that there are no naked singularities other than the Big Bang singularity; all other singularities must be isolated from the rest of the universe by some kind of horizon. The purpose of cosmic censorship is to preserve the universe's causality, since a naked would make causality break down and make it impossible to predict the behavior of future space-time based on the behavior of past space-time.

“I would say the thing of most import about our work is it establishes that, at least in five dimensions, there are 'reasonable' solutions to Einstein's field equations, i.e., solutions that don't have naked singularities and aren't special in any way, yet they naturally evolve to a nakedly-singular state,” Pretorius told PhysOrg.com. “Whether higher dimensions are key here (or whether they even exist!) is an open question, but at least this shows that the Einstein equations themselves don't possess some 'magical' property that generically would enforce cosmic censorship.”

Lehner added that, although the current study deals with five dimensions, the results are likely the same up to 13 dimensions. The study suggests that perhaps four dimensions is somehow “special” in that that is where cosmic censorship seems to hold its ground. To violate cosmic censorship in four dimensions, an unusual mechanism or unnatural energy source is required. In contrast, in five to 13 dimensions, naked singularities appear naturally with no fine-tuning. This finding may also help physicists find a theory of quantum gravity.

“Some people expect that a theory of quantum gravity, possibly like string theory, should be able to explain the singularities classical general relativity has but cannot itself explain,” said Pretorius. “In that sense, singularities then aren't 'bad,' we just need a better theory. However, the problem here is we don't know what the 'true' theory of quantum gravity is. Thus, if there are naked singularities in nature, there would be phenomena in the universe we can't explain by the theories we have. Some people (like Hawking) view this as 'anathema,' and think cosmic censorship is needed to prevent such a disaster; others (like Thorne), think it would be great if there were (benign) naked singularities, as this would give us a direct look into the inner workings of . I'm in the latter camp!”

Explore further: Serial time-encoded amplified microscopy for ultrafast imaging based on multi-wavelength laser

More information: Luis Lehner and Frans Pretorius. “Black Strings, Low Viscosity Fluids, and Violation of Cosmic Censorship.” Physical Review Letters 105, 101102 (2010). DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.105.101102

4.5 /5 (36 votes)

Related Stories

Who cares about the fourth dimension?

Feb 03, 2009

Austrian scientists are trying to understand the mysteries of the holographic principle: How many dimensions are there in our universe?

Recommended for you

A transistor-like amplifier for single photons

52 minutes ago

Data transmission over long distances usually utilizes optical techniques via glass fibres – this ensures high speed transmission combined with low power dissipation of the signal. For quite some years ...

Timely arrival of Pharao space clock

Jul 28, 2014

ESA has welcomed the arrival of Pharao, an important part of ESA's atomic clock experiment that will be attached to the International Space Station in 2016.

First in-situ images of void collapse in explosives

Jul 25, 2014

While creating the first-ever images of explosives using an x-ray free electron laser in California, Los Alamos researchers and collaborators demonstrated a crucial diagnostic for studying how voids affect ...

User comments : 14

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

Skeptic_Heretic
3.5 / 5 (8) Sep 10, 2010
Another screen name Zephir?

Well at least wiki11 is gone for now. Let's see how long this one lasts.
Hesperos
Sep 10, 2010
This comment has been removed by a moderator.
Cave_Man
Sep 10, 2010
This comment has been removed by a moderator.
DamienS
4.6 / 5 (12) Sep 10, 2010
Einstein...had no particle accelerators or gigawatt lasers and yet he speculated the hell out of science, if it weren't for his speculation masturbation we wouldn't even have nuclear power.

Einstein was a great theoretician but he didn't work in a vacuum and was influenced by many great contemporaries like Mach, Planck, Maxwell, Grossmann, Lorentz, Reimann, et al.
Star_Gazer
4.5 / 5 (8) Sep 11, 2010
This article just blew my mind.. Love science! =)
genastropsychicallst
Sep 11, 2010
This comment has been removed by a moderator.
Noumenon
4.8 / 5 (51) Sep 11, 2010
It's well known, most of Einstein's ideas regarding special relativity were bespoken by many others (Lorentz, Poincare, Voit, Fitzgerald, Larmor, etc). After all, this is why the mathematical engine of special relativity is called a "Lorentz transform", not "Einstein's transform". Einstein "forgot" to quote many of his predecessors,
Yes, but the Lorentz and Fitzgerald were merely mathematical duck tape applied to a tired ether conceptual scheme,... in Einstein's hands, they were a revolution and profound insight. The same thing occurred with Planck where yes he figured out how to 'get it to work out', but physics is the pursuit of establishing a conceptual paradigm in which to correlate observables, so Einstein proposed discrete energy in that case. Insight is why Einstein is remembered, and missed opportunity is what Lorentz is remembered for.
No one is supprised that you would want to emphasize the old timers point of view.

Noumenon
4.8 / 5 (48) Sep 11, 2010
Though I may agree with you about string theory. The thing with it is that all the arbitrary extra degrees of freedom will only be justified if the entire scheme functions eventually as a inductive science. I can't help feeling that invoking dimensions we can't possible interact with is a cope out or cheating science, yet may be the only way to tie it all together. Seems like a very nice symmetrical ball of duck tape, that eventually the only use will be to toss out of a plane.
Lordjavathe3rd
2.4 / 5 (9) Sep 11, 2010
All I'm saying is why don't they call them White Strings. Racists, the lot of you.
yyz
5 / 5 (2) Sep 11, 2010
"We're just revealing the things, which Descartes conjectured before 450 years.."

"Do you know, Descartes considered distribution of stars affected with branes of cosmic foam?

http://www.cartes...tici.jpg "

Are you sure Descartes wasn't conceptualizing the "Cheerios effect"?

Husky
3.5 / 5 (4) Sep 11, 2010
invoking extra dimensions feels like invoking the invisible emperors clothes, I hope these dimensions (if they exist at all) could be tested/probed soon if we are to step another milestone
Noumenon
4.8 / 5 (48) Sep 11, 2010
@Awt-face,
Could you make the GPS system work independently of GR?
rah
2.7 / 5 (7) Sep 11, 2010
Regarding the fate of the 5 dimensional black strings; They're dead! All of them. The six dimensional white strings...it was horrible...the six dimensional white strings snuck up on them while they were on break, "taking five" as they liked to joke..I'm sorry, I can't continue...
Objectivist
4 / 5 (8) Sep 11, 2010
What is with you and your desperate need for the confirmation of others regarding aether theories? What can you possibly gain from this nonsense? Say your best case scenario plays out, what then? What was all the ridiculous spamming for? What could possibly be worth the trouble? To return and mock others? Is that the final reward? Are you really that petty or do you have a just reason for this nonsense? Come to think of it, I don't even care. Just do yourself a favor, save yourself the trouble, and don't visit physorg. If you want to be productive, this is not the place for you, regardless if you're right or wrong--it's that simple.
Objectivist
Sep 12, 2010
This comment has been removed by a moderator.
yyz
5 / 5 (5) Sep 12, 2010
Wow. This thread just got a lot shorter.

I was going to point out that Alizee misreferenced "cosmic strings" in one of his posts here. I see the mods have made it a moot point. THANK YOU!

For those unclear on the concept, cosmic strings and strings represented in string theory are two different beasts.

http://en.wikiped..._strings
http://en.wikiped...g_theory

btw, the original paper referenced in this article can be found here: http://arxiv.org/abs/1006.5960
AWT
1 / 5 (4) Sep 13, 2010
The above article has nothing to do with string theory and quantized strings of string theory. It doesn't use quantum mechanics.
uuhhmmm
Sep 22, 2010
This comment has been removed by a moderator.
vidyunmaya
1 / 5 (3) Oct 13, 2010
Sub: Space Science need to search Origins
Both Big-Bang hanover and Singularity will not help or inspire next dimensional frame-We are under Shaded Universe.Our ignorance should not add to more Confusion or mix ups
http://cosmology_definition.rediffblogs.com/
http://www.scribd...ORMATION
Vidyardhi Nanduri [Cosmology Vedas Interlinks]