Cosmic accelerators discovered in our galaxy by UCLA physicists, Japanese colleague

Aug 17, 2010

Physicists from UCLA and Japan have discovered evidence of "natural nuclear accelerators" at work in our Milky Way galaxy, based on an analysis of data from the world's largest cosmic ray detector.

The research is published Aug. 20 in the journal .

Cosmic rays of the highest energies were believed by physicists to come from remote galaxies containing enormous capable of consuming stars and accelerating at energies comparable to that of a bullet shot from a rifle. These protons — referred to individually as "cosmic rays" — travel through space and eventually enter our galaxy.

But earlier this year, physicists using the Pierre Auger Observatory in Argentina, the world's largest cosmic ray observatory, published a surprising discovery: Many of the energetic cosmic rays found in the Milky Way are not actually protons but nuclei — and the higher the energy, the greater the nuclei-to-proton ratio.

"This finding was totally unexpected because the nuclei, more fragile than protons, tend to disintegrate into protons on their long journey through space," said Alexander Kusenko, UCLA professor of physics and astronomy and co-author of the Physical Review Letters research. "Moreover, it is very unlikely that a cosmic accelerator of any kind would accelerate nuclei better than protons at these high energies."

The resolution to the paradox of the nuclei's origin comes from an analysis by Kusenko; Antoine Calvez, a UCLA graduate student of physics who is part of Kusenko's research group; and Shigehiro Nagataki, an associate professor of physics at Japan's Kyoto University. They found that stellar explosions in our own galaxy can accelerate both protons and nuclei.

But while the protons promptly leave the galaxy, the heavier and less mobile nuclei become trapped in the turbulent and linger longer.

"As a result, the local density of nuclei is increased, and they bombard Earth in greater numbers, as seen by the Pierre Auger Observatory," said Kusenko, who is also a senior scientist at the University of Tokyo's Institute for Physics and Mathematics of the Universe (IPMU).

These ultra-high-energy nuclei have been trapped in the web of galactic magnetic fields for millions of years, and their arrival directions as they enter the Earth's atmosphere have been "completely randomized by numerous twists and turns in the tangled field," he said.

"When the data came out, they were so unexpected that many people started questioning the applicability of known laws of physics at high energy," Kusenko said. "The common lore has been that all ultra-high-energy cosmic rays must come from outside the galaxy. The lack of plausible sources and the arrival-direction anisotropy (the nuclei have different physical properties when measured in different directions) have been used as arguments in favor of extragalactic sources.

"However, since the cosmic rays in question turned out to be nuclei, the galactic field can randomize their arrival directions, taking care of the anisotropy puzzle. As for the plausible sources, the enormous stellar explosions responsible for gamma ray bursts can accelerate to high energies. When we put these two together, we knew we were on the right track. Then we calculated the spectra and the asymmetries, and both agreed with the data very well."

Kusenko hopes this research will enhance the understanding of "astrophysical archeology."

"We can study the collective effects of gamma ray bursts that have taken place in the past of our own galaxy over millions of years," he said.

capable of accelerating particles to ultra-high energies have been seen in other galaxies, where they produce gamma-ray bursts. The new analysis provides evidence that such powerful explosions occur in our galaxy as well, at least a few times per million years, Kusenko said.

Kusenko and his colleagues predict that the protons escaping from other galaxies should still be seen at the highest energies and should point back to their sources, providing Pierre Auger Observatory with valuable data.

The Pierre Auger Observatory records cosmic ray showers through an array of 1,600 particle detectors placed about one mile apart in a grid spread across 1,200 square miles, complemented by specially designed telescopes. The observatory is named for the French physicist Pierre Victor Auger, who in the 1920s discovered air showers.

Explore further: Telescopes hint at neutrino beacon at the heart of the Milky Way

Provided by University of California - Los Angeles

5 /5 (24 votes)

Related Stories

Messengers from the Extreme Universe

Nov 10, 2005

A unique observatory in a remote location in Argentina is starting to unravel the mysteries of High Energy Cosmic Rays. There is no scientific consensus on the source of these particles which the shower the ...

Antarctic "Telescopes" Look for Cosmic Rays

Feb 08, 2005

Working in the harsh conditions of Antarctica, Maryland researchers are creating new ways of detecting cosmic rays, high energy particles that bombard the Earth from beyond our solar system.

Scientists Prove Cosmic Rays Are Made of Protons

Jul 01, 2010

Cosmic rays are made of protons, scientists found as they used a vast array of telescopes arranged across the Utah desert. Each telescope in the 67-unit arrangement sees the sky with a multifaceted eye. It’s ...

Discrepant features found in cosmic ray energy spectra

Jun 03, 2010

(PhysOrg.com) -- In May a University of Maryland-led team of scientists reported some previously unknown features in the energy spectra of cosmic ray nuclei, which have been studied for almost 100 years. Cosmic rays were ...

Recommended for you

A colorful gathering of middle-aged stars

Nov 26, 2014

NGC 3532 is a bright open cluster located some 1300 light-years away in the constellation of Carina(The Keel of the ship Argo). It is informally known as the Wishing Well Cluster, as it resembles scattered ...

User comments : 8

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

gunslingor1
1.3 / 5 (3) Aug 17, 2010
Every single word above sounds like nothing more than speculation.
fmfbrestel
5 / 5 (6) Aug 17, 2010
well it was obviously dumbed down for general publication, but the main discovery is sound enough: More cosmic rays are composed of nuclei then standard theory predicts.

nucleic decay into protons has a fairly well defined time span. (this is not stated this clearly, but assumed by the article, and a true statement)

conclusion: nucleic cosmic rays originate from our own galaxy.

Fairly straight forward, but yeah, the article sounds like it was written by a sophomore english major trying to summarize their journal submission.
Thadieus
5 / 5 (1) Aug 17, 2010
I wrote it so goto he..
Parsec
4.7 / 5 (6) Aug 17, 2010
Also keep in mind that the highest energy cosmic rays are traveling so close to the speed of light that they experience extreme time dilation. This means that a nuclei may only experience a few days of local time even after millions of years of travel time (measured by a clock on earth). However, external galactic sources will almost certainly allow any nuclei except at the most extreme energies to decay.
gunslingor1
1 / 5 (2) Aug 18, 2010
All good points. I just wish physics dudes would start saying "it appears to be..." or "we initially think..."

Everything we are learning now is just appearances, we don't know what is really going on and cannot directly observe all these theories in work.

One thing I've been wondering about developing a unified field theory, have they every considered magnitude in there equations? To me, this seems critical. I think the extremely small and extremely large will fit together if they account for the differences in the laws at different magnitudes.
fmfbrestel
3.8 / 5 (4) Aug 18, 2010
nope gunslingor, your the only one to ever consider that magnitude might play a role between the extremely small and extremely large.

Sheesh

proposed unified field theories are orders of magnitude more complex then you seem to realize. But im sure that that the thousands of PhD's working on it just overlooked the magnitude difference, and will thank you greatly for correcting their oversight.
gunslingor1
1 / 5 (1) Aug 18, 2010
lol, very nice sarcastic response. I see how my idea was completely mmisinterpreted, Which is fine.. dont have time to explain.
Jordian
not rated yet Aug 18, 2010
Interesting....so would it be fair to say that there are many more gamma ray bursts and exotic "accelerators" in our own galaxy than we previously suspected?

Seems like our Milky Way is more wild that we thought.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.