Arctic rocks offer new glimpse of primitive Earth

Aug 11, 2010

Scientists have discovered a new window into the Earth's violent past. Geochemical evidence from volcanic rocks collected on Baffin Island in the Canadian Arctic suggests that beneath it lies a region of the Earth's mantle that has largely escaped the billions of years of melting and geological churning that has affected the rest of the planet. Researchers believe the discovery offers clues to the early chemical evolution of the Earth.

The newly identified mantle "reservoir," as it is called, dates from just a few tens of million years after the was first assembled from the collisions of smaller bodies. This reservoir likely represents the composition of the mantle shortly after formation of the core, but before the 4.5 billion years of crust formation and recycling modified the composition of most of the rest of Earth's interior.

"This was a key phase in the evolution of the Earth," says co-author Richard Carlson of the Carnegie Institution's Department of . "It set the stage for everything that came after. Primitive mantle such as that we have identified would have been the ultimate source of all the magmas and all the different rock types we see on Earth today."

Carlson and lead author Matthew Jackson (a former Carnegie postdoctoral fellow, now at Boston University), with colleagues, using samples collected by coauthor Don Francis of McGill University, targeted the Baffin Island rocks, which are the earliest expression of the mantle hotspot now feeding volcanic eruptions on Iceland, because previous study of in these rocks showed them to have anomalously high ratios of helium-3 to helium-4. Helium-3 is generally extremely rare within the Earth; most of the mantle's supply has been outgassed by volcanic eruptions and lost to space over the planet's long geological history. In contrast, helium-4 has been constantly replenished within the Earth by the decay of radioactive uranium and thorium. The high proportion of helium-3 suggests that the Baffin Island lavas came from a reservoir in the mantle that had never previously outgassed its original helium-3, implying that it had not been subjected to the extensive chemical differentiation experienced by most of the mantle.

The researchers confirmed this conclusion by analyzing the lead isotopes in the lava samples, which date the reservoir to between 4.55 and 4.45 billion years old. This age is only slightly younger than the Earth itself. The early age of the mantle reservoir implies that it existed before melting of the mantle began to create the magmas that rose to form Earth's crust and before plate tectonics allowed that crust to be mixed back into the mantle.

Many researchers have assumed that before continental crust formed the mantle's chemistry was similar to that of meteorites called chondrites, but that the formation of continents altered its chemistry, causing it to become depleted in the elements, called incompatible elements, that are extracted with the magma when melting occurs in the mantle. "Our results question this assumption," says Carlson. "They suggest that before continent extraction, the mantle already was depleted in incompatible elements compared to chondrites, perhaps because of an even earlier Earth differentiation event, or perhaps because the Earth originally formed from building blocks depleted in these elements."

Of the two possibilities, Carlson favors the early differentiation model, which would involve a global magma ocean on the newly-formed Earth. This magma ocean produced a crust that predated the crust that exists today. "In our model, the original crust that formed by the solidification of the magma ocean was buoyantly unstable at Earth's surface because it was rich in iron," he says. "This instability caused it to sink to the base of the mantle, taking the incompatible elements with it, where it remains today."

Some of this deep material may have remained liquid despite the high pressures, and Carlson points out that seismological studies of the deep mantle reveal certain areas, one beneath the southern Pacific and another beneath Africa, that appear to be molten and possibly chemically different from the rest of the mantle. "I'm holding out hope that these seismically imaged areas might be the compositional complement to the "depleted" primitive that we sample in the Baffin Island lavas," he says.

Explore further: NASA HS3 mission Global Hawk's bullseye in Hurricane Edouard

Provided by Carnegie Institution

3.4 /5 (26 votes)

Related Stories

Helium-3 - all is not lost

Sep 03, 2005

Is there a reservoir of primordial rock deep within the Earth, left over from the birth of our planet? Geochemical data have traditionally indicated 'yes', but evidence from seismology seemed inconsistent with the survival ...

Recommended for you

NASA image: Fires in the southern United States

6 hours ago

In this image taken by the Aqua satellite of the southern United States actively burning areas as detected by MODIS's thermal bands are outlined in red. Each red hot spot is an area where the thermal detectors ...

Software models ocean currents for oil and gas search

7 hours ago

A study involving the use of streamline visualisation has found the technology can help guide electromagnetic transmitter and receiver placements, thereby aiding the search for oil and gas on the seafloor.

User comments : 6

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

omatumr
3 / 5 (1) Aug 11, 2010
Congratulations!

If the material is actually "between 4.55 and 4.45 billion years old", it will probably contain excess Xe-129 from the decay of extinct I-129 and excess Xe-131-136 from the spontaneous fission of extinct Pu-244.

These two decay products were first discovered in fluid CO2 from the Earth's mantle [“The xenon record of extinct radioactivities in the earth”, Science 174 (1971) 1334-1336].

With kind regards,
Oliver K. Manuel
scidog
not rated yet Aug 11, 2010
1971???..
omatumr
3 / 5 (1) Aug 12, 2010
1971???..


Yes, a graduate student, Mervet Boulos, and I reported the decay products of these two extinct elements in CO2 gas used to make Dry Ice in 1971.

In 1975 another graduate student, Edward Hennecke, and I reported these same decay products in CO2 fluid inclusions trapped in an Hawaiian olivine xenolith carried to Earth's surface by a volcano ["Noble gases in an Hawaiian xenolith", Nature 257 (30 October 1975) 778 - 780].

With kind regards,
Oliver K. Manuel
Former NASA Principal
Investigator for Apollo
kevinrtrs
Aug 12, 2010
This comment has been removed by a moderator.
Skeptic_Heretic
3 / 5 (4) Aug 12, 2010
One rock smashing into another will simply bounce off in some other direction, surely! Any high school student can tell you that.
Nah, most of them take physics at some point in time.
It's just some miraculous properties conferred by simulation programs that allow rocks to stick together and form massive bodies.
Again, physics.
Out in the real world rocks tumble and smash and bounce all over the place. Especially in space where there's no air resistance.
Ok dumbass, there's also no overwhelming gravity. Rocks bounce off each other on earth because they're being attracted to the largest rock present, the planet. In space there is "microgravity" without an overwhelming macrogravity source interjecting.

Go read something, other than that shitstain called the Bible.
Ethelred
not rated yet Aug 13, 2010
The accretion theory holds no water - literally!!!
Nonsense. As usual.
One rock smashing into another will simply bounce off in some other direction, surely!
No. They will usually smash a bit. Especially since early rocks in space weren't rocks and those that are still primordial aren't rocks now. They are soft bundles of dust unless they collect into large enough masses to melt and then form rock. Which takes millions of years.
t's just some miraculous properties conferred by simulation programs that allow rocks to stick together and form massive bodies.
YES the miraculous products of physics and evidence.

By the way have you found any evidence for the Great Flood yet. How is that humble pie you have to eat because you don't have any evidence?
I dare anyone to show otherwise.
I just did so what are you going to do about it? Oh that's right. Your going to run away.

Run away run away run away no never mind I have another post
Ethelred
5 / 5 (1) Aug 13, 2010
a big mountain of salt.
Which was formed over millions of years through evaporation in shallow seas and the buried under under millions of years of sediment
The earth was created by God. Roughly 6000 years ago. Period.
And what evidence do you have to support that statement. A book written thousands of years ago by people that at least had reasons for their ignorance is not evidence of anything except ignorance.
Of course you are free to believe whatever you wish
Yes. Because the people that wrote the US Constitution and the Bill of Rights chose to create a secular nation.

Ethelred