Boeing unveils its commercial capsule spacecraft

Jul 22, 2010 by Lin Edwards report
An artist rendering of Boeing's CST-100. Credit: Boeing

(PhysOrg.com) -- Boeing unveiled its plans for a capsule spacecraft for ferrying astronauts and cargo to space stations at the biennial Farnborough International Air Show in the UK on July 19th. The craft is designed to fill the gap that will be left when the NASA space shuttles are retired from service next year.

Boeing won an award worth $18 million from NASA under the Commercial Crew Development (CCDev) Space Act Agreement, which was intended to help in the development of new commercial systems for transporting to the and any future private space stations.

The Boeing low-cost craft, Crew Space Transportation-100 (CST-100), is designed to carry up to seven astronauts on short missions up to 100 kilometers above the Earth’s surface. The craft resembles the Apollo spacecraft that transported astronauts to the moon in the 1960s and 70s, but is larger.

The craft will be able to remain docked to a in orbit up to seven months and will be protected during re-entry by an ablative heat shield. It will then descend with the aid of parachutes to an airbag-cushioned landing on dry ground. The heat shield would be replaced to allow the craft to fly again. The design allows for up to 10 missions for each craft.

Boeing said the first CST-100 will be launched from Florida, possibly as early as 2014 if enough funding is available. The design is compatible with a range of rockets including the Atlas V, Delta IV or SpaceX’s Falcon 9 rocket, but the final choice of rocket is not yet decided.

NASA will not be Boeing’s only customer, as the company has also partnered with Bigelow Aerospace, which joined the Commercial Spaceflight Federation in June. According to Boeing, Bigelow Aerospace will contribute their expertise in designing and constructing space facilities, as well as being a user of the CST-100.

Robert Bigelow said the idea of the alliance was to make space travel commercial “the way air travel became commercial a century ago.” Boeing’s vice president Brewster Shaw agreed, saying the company’s vision was to become the Boeing commercial aircraft of space flight.

Boeing unveils its commercial capsule spacecraft
The CST-100 spacecraft approaching a Bigelow space station. Credit: Boeing

Bigelow Aerospace is building two types of space module — the Sundancer and BA330 — that will form part of the world’s first commercial space station, called the Orbital Space Complex, which the company hopes to be in orbit and operational by 2015. Bigelow said three-quarters of their revenue from space station customers would go towards the space transportation provider.

Exploration Technologies (SpaceX) and Orbital Sciences Corporation are also developing similar , with the help of NASA funding.

Explore further: NASA deep-space rocket, SLS, to launch in 2018

Related Stories

NASA selects Ares I upper state contractor

Aug 29, 2007

The National Aeronautics and Space Administration has selected The Boeing Co. to provide design and construction support for the Ares I rocket upper stage.

NASA proposes $17.6 billion budget

Feb 05, 2008

U.S. space officials proposed spending $17.6 billion next year with a focus on the International Space Station and space shuttle programs.

Change in space for NASA: Renting the Right Stuff

Jan 31, 2010

(AP) -- Getting to space is about to be outsourced. The Obama administration on Monday will propose in its new budget spending billions of dollars to encourage private companies to build, launch and operate ...

Recommended for you

Light of life

14 hours ago

A fluorescent microscopic view of cells from a type of bone cancer, being studied for a future trip to deep space – aiming to sharpen our understanding of the hazardous radiation prevailing out there.

Local model better describes lunar gravity

19 hours ago

Two satellites orbiting the Moon as a part of NASA's Gravity Recovery and Interior Laboratory (GRAIL) mission have been mapping its inner structure by measuring subtle shifts in the pull of gravity on the ...

User comments : 23

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

antialias
4 / 5 (8) Jul 22, 2010
That computer graphic seems like an awful lot of people (without spacesuits!) with very little space for support systems. Is this a joke?
Bob_Kob
4.7 / 5 (3) Jul 22, 2010
Not sure, its not like they will be travelling for very long, probably only a few hours from launch to docking, so i guess it doesnt have to be too large.
Birger
not rated yet Jul 22, 2010
Typo: "Short missions up to 100 km abovethe Earth's surface" -minimum parking orbit is at 185 km, space stations need to be at 350km minimum.
Birger
1 / 5 (3) Jul 22, 2010
Good luck sitting crammed into that capsule when the other six passengers get space-sick (a common phenomenon during the first day in microgravity)
Adriab
not rated yet Jul 22, 2010
Typo: "Short missions up to 100 km abovethe Earth's surface" -minimum parking orbit is at 185 km, space stations need to be at 350km minimum.


I'm not sure about the typo-ness of this statement, it was reported as 100km at space.com as well. I hope its not the true ability of the craft.

Perhaps they just gave out the wrong number? 100 miles is only just under 161km, so I don't think they mixed up the units. Maybe the 100km mark is just for testing...
david_42
not rated yet Jul 22, 2010
The Boeing press release gives the same number, so I guess they'll get the rest of the way on unicorn burgers. But, unless the design is grossly overweight, any of those three boosters would have no problem making ISS orbit.
Nik_2213
not rated yet Jul 22, 2010
Could be they're wearing 'elastic' pressure suits rather than the current 'bag & ring' variety...
El_Nose
Jul 22, 2010
This comment has been removed by a moderator.
DaveGee
4.9 / 5 (8) Jul 22, 2010
As someone who saw the lunar launch as a very young child... Fast forward forty one years into the future and I'm quite saddened to see the current state of the art in space travel. :(
antialias_physorg
2.7 / 5 (3) Jul 22, 2010
If you look at the new design for the russian capsule to transfer people to space stations:
http://www.bbc.co...10725093
You might notice the marked differences in the ratio of people-to-volume-of-support-systems.

Since the russians (and especially Roskosmos) have a little experience in these things (and Boeing doesn't) I'd say that the Boeing design is a PR gag targetted at garnering government capital.
Mayday
2 / 5 (1) Jul 22, 2010
This is not real. The crew will need to survive at least two days in orbit, in the event of a missed docking or space debris evasion. This ship is either way too small or the people shown inside are way too big. But a video of an emergency egress drill would be an instant YouTube hit.
thetruechaos
2.6 / 5 (5) Jul 22, 2010
Sounds like a bunch of people who should have no opinion are having one. Spacecraft design degrees please? Oh wait, those guys are building spacecraft right now, the rest are commenting based on a figurative expertise. This parallels the United States political system. So voter whats your views on mercantilism, Marxism, and soft power.
Buyck
3 / 5 (2) Jul 22, 2010
At last... at last!!! We have waiting decades for a commercial capsule like this! Yes, finally people can go into space.

Now they have to develop it better (more comfort) and lower prices. But thats gonna take a dedace and more i think. But... yes finally something!
Soulless49er
1 / 5 (1) Jul 22, 2010
It looks like a flying saucer. When people see this in the sky they will mistakenly think it's aliens.
Shootist
1.3 / 5 (3) Jul 22, 2010
NASA, so much promise, so little success.

The bureaucracy has struck, Pournelle's Iron Law in action.
Soulless49er
1 / 5 (1) Jul 22, 2010
So I guess our future spacecraft will not look like the shuttle, they will look like flying saucers?

I've read some articles stating that they plan to eventually put in the nuclear powered VASPIR engine in these capsule/flying saucer space crafts to allow them to fly to Mars and other planetary bodies, which would mean they would be similar to the flying saucer Bob Lazar said he worked on at Area 51 S4.

Bob Lazar said he worked on a crashed alien flying saucer that originated from the star system Zeta Reticuli that used a nuclear powered engine and anti-gravity technology.
kevinrtrs
1 / 5 (1) Jul 23, 2010
Mmmmhhhh, looks like a knee-jerk response to the Russian announcement???? Maybe I'm just cynical.
alq131
not rated yet Jul 23, 2010
The only news is that it has taken Boeing so long to do this. The Dragon X has funding along with other contenders who aren't the big names in Aerospace. Just like we don't see Burlington-Northern or Canada-Pacific airlines, we won't see Boeing Spacelines...the big names are too big to be innovative and will miss the new markets. The Dragon X and a spacestation from Bigelow Aerospace will usher in a new era of space exploration.

It will probably be a private company that sends tourists for a spin around the moon...Space Adventures is already mulling the idea of a modified Soyuz to take a couple customers on a lunar orbit insertion and return to Earth (no landing on moon) for about $100M
DaveGee
not rated yet Jul 24, 2010
To all those making a flying saucer connection.... You do realize that this is a capsule that will be placed atop a traditional rocket and launched off into space just as they were 40+ years ago... Allthough I guess this model will have that 'new capsule smell' and third row seating for that comfortable ride and maybe a bit more legroom.

But as far a flying saucers go.... This will only plummet back to the earth and be slowed/landed by a combination of parachutes and inflatable cushions. This has only the most limited built in propulsion necessary for docking with a space station.
jmcenanly
not rated yet Jul 25, 2010
I've noticed that the crew member in the lower row, closest to us, is on the small side. Is Boeing simply showing the range of sizes it can accommodate, or are they proposing children into space?
RobertKLR
1 / 5 (1) Jul 25, 2010
I don't see any black people. Why not?
fixer
not rated yet Jul 25, 2010
Why are they seated in rows?
Built in gravity generator?
james11
1 / 5 (1) Jul 26, 2010
What happens when they get up there and someone starts flipping out?
bottomlesssoul
not rated yet Jul 26, 2010
I'm not sure about the economics since every launch vehicle listed is about $400 million. Allow for one crew and 6 passengers and total cost of $420M gives a cost of $70M per passenger before any risk or profit is considered.

The cost is clearly dominated by the non-reusable launch vehicle requirements.

On the other hand if a smaller and cheaper vehicle could be used a $25M 3 week holiday for one would be possible.

And yes, if someone could afford to lift an entire family I don't see any immediate concerns for at least young adults.

Who would pay these prices for memories for their children if they knew when (if) it was remembered in adulthood it could at best be interpreted as a dream they maybe had?