Do Atlantic currents affect Alpine glacier melting?

Jun 15, 2010
The Evolution of the Rhone glacier from 1850 until today. (Foto: VAW-ETHZ)

Natural climate fluctuations such as variations in the Atlantic currents probably influenced glacier retreat in the Alps in the last century more than we first thought: they correlate with times of particularly striking glacial retreat, but also with times of growth. This is shown in a new study of Swiss glaciers.

Nowhere in the world is the array of observations carried out on glaciers as comprehensive and long as in Switzerland. For more than 100 years the Swiss glaciers have been observed, more and more new topographic maps compiled, taken and measurements made on the glaciers. This collection of survey data can be used to verify how much mass the glaciers are losing and how severely they have been affected by up to now. The data also provides a basis on which to forecast future glacier retreat and its consequences.

The consequences of shrinking glaciers

Glacier melt-water has a decisive effect on energy generation by hydroelectric power stations in Switzerland. also change the landscape’s appearance and could harm the tourist industry. Matthias Huss, a former doctoral student of the glaciologist Martin Funk, Professor and Head of the Department at the Laboratory of Hydraulics, Hydrology and Glaciology (VAW) at ETH Zurich, says that the sea level could rise by up to half a metre worldwide purely as a result of melting mountain glaciers.

Together with ETH Zurich glaciologists Martin Funk and Andreas Bauder, as well as a colleague from Alaska, Huss has compiled all the available data on thirty Swiss glaciers of various sizes: for each glacier this involves up to nine digital terrain models providing information about how the volume of ice has changed over the course of time. Added to this are more than 10,000 measurements made directly on the glaciers during the past century. All this data forms the basis for a model which can be used to determine the development of the glaciers since 1908 at high temporal and spatial resolution.

Not transferable to all glaciers

The results show that the individual glaciers lose mass at different rates. Martin Funk stresses that the results are unexpected, and it is not clear why some glaciers lose ice more quickly and others more slowly. More research is needed here. “This is why we must be careful when transferring the results to a whole mountain range or even to other glacier regions in the world,” says Funk. However, all of the 30 glaciers that were studied in this case receded significantly and lost a total of about 30 percent of their mass.

The scientists also compared the time series of glacier mass loss with an index that is known as the Atlantic Multidecadal Oscillation (AMO). The AMO is a natural phenomenon in which the surface temperature of the Atlantic rises and falls again in cycles of about 60 years. The cause of the oscillation is still not entirely clear. Huss explains that it is probably associated with periodic natural variations in the ocean currents.

The researchers report that the mass balance of the Swiss glaciers correlates with the AMO. The AMO can explain the periods of especially marked glacier retreats, e.g. in the 1940s and since the 1980s, as well as the stagnation or growth during and the 1910s and in the 1970s. This indicates that the ocean surface temperatures in the Atlantic were above average during periods of rapid glacier shrinkage and vice versa. The researchers say the prevailing conditions in the Atlantic are currently speeding up glacier shrinkage. This leads us to the conclusion that up to half of the recently accelerated mass losses could have been caused by natural climate fluctuations.

Anthropogenic influence is intensifying

At the same time, the glaciologist Matthias Huss, now at the University of Fribourg, warns against false conclusions: “The cause of the sustained glacial shrinkage trend in the last hundred years has an anthropogenic origin, a result of the increase in the level of CO2 in the atmosphere.” However, the periodic deviations from the average mass loss have been intensified or weakened by various natural causes.

Only last December, Huss, together with Professors Funk and Ohmura of ETH Zurich, published a study in which they showed that melted at a faster rate in the 1940s than they do nowadays, and that glacier melting is influenced by long-term changes in solar radiation. These radiation changes correspond to the so-called “global dimming” and “global brightening” phenomena and are associated with an increase and reduction respectively in the pollution of the atmosphere by aerosols.

Explore further: Quakes destroy or damage 83 houses in Philippines

More information: Huss M, Hock R, Bauder A & Funk M: 100-year mass changes in the Swiss Alps linked to the Atlantic Multidecadal Oscillation, Geophysical Research Letters (2010), 37, L10501, doi:10.1029/2010GL042616

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Scientists expect increased melting of mountain glaciers

Jan 20, 2006

Sea level rise due to increased melting of mountain glaciers and polar ice caps will be much lower in the 21st Century than previously estimated. However, decay of mountain glaciers in due to global warming will be much more ...

Global glacier melt continues

Jan 29, 2009

Glaciers around the globe continue to melt at high rates. Tentative figures for the year 2007, of the World Glacier Monitoring Service at the University of Zurich, Switzerland, indicate a further loss of average ice thickness ...

2 more glaciers gone from Glacier National Park

Apr 07, 2010

(AP) -- Glacier National Park has lost two more of its namesake moving icefields to climate change, which is shrinking the rivers of ice until they grind to a halt, a government researcher said Wednesday.

Glaciers feeding Ganges may melt down

Jul 01, 2005

Indian scientists say carbon dioxide and other emissions will cause the melt down of glaciers feeding the Ganges River before the century's end.

Study: Alpine glaciers may nearly vanish

Apr 04, 2006

The World Glacier Monitoring Service is warning Europe's Alps might lose three-quarters of its glaciers to global warming during the coming century.

Recommended for you

Kiribati leader visits Arctic on climate mission

Sep 20, 2014

Fearing that his Pacific island nation could be swallowed by a rising ocean, the president of Kiribati says a visit to the melting Arctic has helped him appreciate the scale of the threat.

NASA catches a weaker Edouard, headed toward Azores

Sep 19, 2014

NASA's Aqua satellite passed over the Atlantic Ocean and captured a picture of Tropical Storm Edouard as it continues to weaken. The National Hurricane Center expects Edouard to affect the western Azores ...

User comments : 5

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

PinkElephant
3 / 5 (2) Jun 15, 2010
The Evolution of the Rhone glacier from 1850 until today.
Hm... typo? Probably meant to say 1950: that image on the left looks like a pretty decent and realistic color photograph...
TehDog
1 / 5 (1) Jun 15, 2010
possibly false colour enhancement.
TehDog
1 / 5 (1) Jun 15, 2010
oh, and if it was from the '50's, that would be some major shrinkage. Even the higher altitude feeders seem to have shrunk.
PinkElephant
1 / 5 (1) Jun 15, 2010
Even supposing color enhancement (and one rather masterfully done, at that) -- though why go through the trouble? -- I don't believe in 1850 they were capable of taking photographs with such a high resolution (i.e. "DPI"). The film grain wasn't quite there yet, and the dynamic range of the film/optics system wasn't quite up to snuff either. And the surviving prints/plates have degraded quite a bit since then...

http://en.wikiped...rreotype

As to the amount of shrinkage for the glacier, I don't think it's unreasonable, assuming a span of 60 years.
TehDog
1 / 5 (1) Jun 16, 2010
fair enuff, altho photo manipulation is pretty good these days :)
personally, I'd agree with you, but that is some major shrinkage in 60 years. Ah, after re-reading, I see the article is about "the Atlantic Multidecadal Oscillation". This is something I know nothing about, and will not comment on :)
My 2 comments were merely to do with the photo's.