BP told to use less toxic dispersant in oil spill: report

May 20, 2010
A slick of chemically dispersed oil floats in the Gulf of Mexico with an offshore rig in the background about 14 miles from the Venice marina off the coast of Louisiana on May 5. US officials have given BP 24 hours to adopt a less toxic dispersant to break up the Gulf of Mexico oil slick amid concerns about spewing chemicals into the sea, a report said Thursday.

US officials have given BP 24 hours to adopt a less toxic dispersant to break up the Gulf of Mexico oil slick amid concerns about spewing chemicals into the sea, a report said Thursday.

"Dispersants have never been used in this volume before," an administration official told The Washington Post, only days after US officials approved the use of subsea chemicals to battle the oil spill gushing from a ruptured rig.

"This is a large amount of dispersants being used, larger amounts than have ever been used, on a pipe that continues to leak oil and that BP is still trying to cap."

The Post said the British energy giant, which is battling to contain the oil leak after an April 20 rig explosion, was told by the Environmental Protection Agency late Wednesday to choose a less toxic dispersant within 24 hours.

BP must then begin to start using that dispersant within 72 hours of putting forward its list of alternatives, the Post said, quoting the anonymous official.

The daily said so far BP has been using two types of dispersants, called Corexit 9500A and Corexit 9527A, with 600,000 gallons used on the surface and 55,000 underwater.

The EPA did not immediately respond to a request from AFP to confirm the report.

On Friday US officials approved the use of the controversial subsea chemical dispersants after a team of experts analyzed the results of three tests of their use.

"This was not a decision that was made lightly," said US Coast Guard Rear Admiral Mary Landry.

The dispersant effort is meant to break down the oil so that, over time, the slick is reduced to smaller particles that biodegrade instead of being left as chunky, thick globs that can choke both wildlife and vegetation.

But environmentalists, scientists and fisherman have raised concerns that the dispersants could be creating a toxic soup in critical habitats and simply shifting the damage from the oil out of sight.

Explore further: US delays decision on Keystone pipeline project

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

BP relaunches subsea dispersant operations

May 11, 2010

BP restarted Monday operations to stream dispersants directly into the main Gulf of Mexico oil leak despite fears the chemicals could themselves be harmful to the environment.

Underwater oil could create new 'dead zone' in Gulf

May 18, 2010

Giant plumes of oil drifting deep in the Gulf of Mexico could create a new 'dead zone' of oxygen-depleted waters unfit for marine life and wreak environmental damage that will take generations to overcome, ...

BP oil leak 'much bigger than official estimates'

May 14, 2010

Much more oil is spewing into the Gulf of Mexico from a sunken British Petroleum oil rig than official estimates show, experts warned Friday as BP executives stuck to their guns and even tried to play down ...

The Physics of Oil Spill Cleanups

Nov 19, 2008

Oil spills are a major environmental problem because they often occur at sea and in remote, ecologically-sensitive areas where their impact on birds, sea mammals and subsurface life may last for years.

Recommended for you

US delays decision on Keystone pipeline project

Apr 18, 2014

The United States announced Friday a fresh delay on a final decision regarding a controversial Canada to US oil pipeline, saying more time was needed to carry out a review.

New research on Earth's carbon budget

Apr 18, 2014

(Phys.org) —Results from a research project involving scientists from the Desert Research Institute have generated new findings surrounding some of the unknowns of changes in climate and the degree to which ...

User comments : 3

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

3.7 / 5 (3) May 20, 2010
The decision by BP to use the Corexit dispersants was apparently based upon the fact that they have a financial stake in its manufacturer, Nalco, even though it was known that there were several alternatives that were both more effective dispersing the type of oil being leaked, and less toxic.

This is indicative of the likely course events will take as this catastrophe unfolds- more of the same business-as-usual, divert-the-blame behavior exhibited by corporate "people" worldwide. BP, Transocean, and Halliburton continue to speak out of both sides of their mouths.
not rated yet May 25, 2010

Isn't it wonderful how our useless president stands by and does nothing while all this happens. But don't fret, I'm sure that in a few months when the worst is over he'll be more than happy to do the finger pointing.
1 / 5 (1) May 25, 2010
It is disheartening to see so little action from him- he should be cracking the whip with a vengeance, and seeing to it that the full might of the Federal government is brought to bear to compel corrective action by the three perpetrators of this tragedy. Including the use of a more effective, less toxic dispersant agent, of which there are several.

More news stories

China says massive area of its soil polluted

A huge area of China's soil covering more than twice the size of Spain is estimated to be polluted, the government said Thursday, announcing findings of a survey previously kept secret.

UN weather agency warns of 'El Nino' this year

The UN weather agency Tuesday warned there was a good chance of an "El Nino" climate phenomenon in the Pacific Ocean this year, bringing droughts and heavy rainfall to the rest of the world.

Making graphene in your kitchen

Graphene has been touted as a wonder material—the world's thinnest substance, but super-strong. Now scientists say it is so easy to make you could produce some in your kitchen.

Low tolerance for pain? The reason may be in your genes

Researchers may have identified key genes linked to why some people have a higher tolerance for pain than others, according to a study released today that will be presented at the American Academy of Neurology's 66th Annual ...

How to keep your fitness goals on track

(HealthDay)—The New Year's resolutions many made to get fit have stalled by now. And one expert thinks that's because many people set their goals too high.