BP told to use less toxic dispersant in oil spill: report

May 20, 2010
A slick of chemically dispersed oil floats in the Gulf of Mexico with an offshore rig in the background about 14 miles from the Venice marina off the coast of Louisiana on May 5. US officials have given BP 24 hours to adopt a less toxic dispersant to break up the Gulf of Mexico oil slick amid concerns about spewing chemicals into the sea, a report said Thursday.

US officials have given BP 24 hours to adopt a less toxic dispersant to break up the Gulf of Mexico oil slick amid concerns about spewing chemicals into the sea, a report said Thursday.

"Dispersants have never been used in this volume before," an administration official told The Washington Post, only days after US officials approved the use of subsea chemicals to battle the oil spill gushing from a ruptured rig.

"This is a large amount of dispersants being used, larger amounts than have ever been used, on a pipe that continues to leak oil and that BP is still trying to cap."

The Post said the British energy giant, which is battling to contain the oil leak after an April 20 rig explosion, was told by the Environmental Protection Agency late Wednesday to choose a less toxic dispersant within 24 hours.

BP must then begin to start using that dispersant within 72 hours of putting forward its list of alternatives, the Post said, quoting the anonymous official.

The daily said so far BP has been using two types of dispersants, called Corexit 9500A and Corexit 9527A, with 600,000 gallons used on the surface and 55,000 underwater.

The EPA did not immediately respond to a request from AFP to confirm the report.

On Friday US officials approved the use of the controversial subsea chemical dispersants after a team of experts analyzed the results of three tests of their use.

"This was not a decision that was made lightly," said US Coast Guard Rear Admiral Mary Landry.

The dispersant effort is meant to break down the oil so that, over time, the slick is reduced to smaller particles that biodegrade instead of being left as chunky, thick globs that can choke both wildlife and vegetation.

But environmentalists, scientists and fisherman have raised concerns that the dispersants could be creating a toxic soup in critical habitats and simply shifting the damage from the oil out of sight.

Explore further: Study helps assess impact of temperature on belowground soil decomposition

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

BP relaunches subsea dispersant operations

May 11, 2010

BP restarted Monday operations to stream dispersants directly into the main Gulf of Mexico oil leak despite fears the chemicals could themselves be harmful to the environment.

Underwater oil could create new 'dead zone' in Gulf

May 18, 2010

Giant plumes of oil drifting deep in the Gulf of Mexico could create a new 'dead zone' of oxygen-depleted waters unfit for marine life and wreak environmental damage that will take generations to overcome, ...

BP oil leak 'much bigger than official estimates'

May 14, 2010

Much more oil is spewing into the Gulf of Mexico from a sunken British Petroleum oil rig than official estimates show, experts warned Friday as BP executives stuck to their guns and even tried to play down ...

The Physics of Oil Spill Cleanups

Nov 19, 2008

Oil spills are a major environmental problem because they often occur at sea and in remote, ecologically-sensitive areas where their impact on birds, sea mammals and subsurface life may last for years.

Recommended for you

Big changes in the Sargasso Sea

11 hours ago

Over one thousand miles wide and three thousand miles long, the Sargasso Sea occupies almost two thirds of the North Atlantic Ocean. Within the sea, circling ocean currents accumulate mats of Sargassum seawee ...

Water-quality trading can reduce river pollution

11 hours ago

Allowing polluters to buy, sell or trade water-quality credits could significantly reduce pollution in river basins and estuaries faster and at lower cost than requiring the facilities to meet compliance costs on their own, ...

Managing land into the future

15 hours ago

Food production is the backbone of New Zealand's economy—and a computer modelling programme designed by a Victoria University of Wellington academic is helping ensure that farming practices here and overseas ...

User comments : 3

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

Caliban
3.7 / 5 (3) May 20, 2010
The decision by BP to use the Corexit dispersants was apparently based upon the fact that they have a financial stake in its manufacturer, Nalco, even though it was known that there were several alternatives that were both more effective dispersing the type of oil being leaked, and less toxic.

This is indicative of the likely course events will take as this catastrophe unfolds- more of the same business-as-usual, divert-the-blame behavior exhibited by corporate "people" worldwide. BP, Transocean, and Halliburton continue to speak out of both sides of their mouths.
newsreader
not rated yet May 25, 2010

Isn't it wonderful how our useless president stands by and does nothing while all this happens. But don't fret, I'm sure that in a few months when the worst is over he'll be more than happy to do the finger pointing.
Caliban
1 / 5 (1) May 25, 2010
It is disheartening to see so little action from him- he should be cracking the whip with a vengeance, and seeing to it that the full might of the Federal government is brought to bear to compel corrective action by the three perpetrators of this tragedy. Including the use of a more effective, less toxic dispersant agent, of which there are several.