Key spill size issue: How much and does it matter?

May 15, 2010 By SETH BORENSTEIN and CAIN BURDEAU , Associated Press Writers
This image from a video released by BP PLC shows oil spewing from a yellowish, broken pipe 5,000 feet below the surface. The oil looks like steam rushing from a geyser. The video released Wednesday May 12, 2010 gives a not-yet-seen glimpse of the leaking well a mile underwater. The stream occasionally can be seen becoming lighter as natural gas mixes into the gusher. (AP Photo/BP PLC)

(AP) -- Just how much oil is spewing from the ruptured well in the Gulf of Mexico and how important is it to know that? Experts can't agree on either question.

Some scientists who have studied a new video of the gusher estimate the leak could be 14 times worse than the government says. The feds say stopping the spill, not measuring it, is key.

But does the size matter now anyway?

Many veteran spill experts say trying to figure out how much oil is spewing is like trying to assess the damage of a house fire while firefighters are still trying to put it out. The size will matter later when the damage is tallied.

Others - especially lawyers, environmental advocates and the media - say numbers are needed to get a handle on how big the problem is. But a National Academy of Sciences report seven years ago said the size of a spill doesn't directly correlate to how bad the is.

When BP, which owns the well, released a video Wednesday of the spewing oil, the whole magnitude of the problem seemed to change.

Soon after the explosion three weeks ago, the government said oil and gas were flowing from the at a rate of 210,000 gallons - or 5,000 barrels - a day. Now, after viewing the video, some scientists calculate it at 2 million gallons a day or even higher.

But those estimates come with giant-sized asterisks. Because the video doesn't give experts a proper look, they could be off by millions of gallons of oil a day.

Still, most experts agree it is probably worse than the government acknowledges.

President addressed the issue Friday. "I know there have been varying reports over the last few days about how large the leak is," he said, "but since no one can get down there in person, we know there is a level of uncertainty."

In any case, the government says it has enough equipment to deal with a spill many times bigger than even the highest estimates.

"If you've already amassed all of the resources, boons and skimmers that you can, knowing the amount doesn't make much of a difference," said Wes Tunnell, a 35-year veteran of at Texas A&M University Corpus Christi.

That's the tack the government is taking.

"We're attacking it as if it were a much larger spill, anyway," Coast Guard Admiral Thad Allen said Friday.

Others see it differently, with a prominent House committee chairman demanding better numbers from BP.

"The amount of oil leaking is a big, big deal; it's not to be taken lightly if it really is off by the factors that we're hearing. Ten times as much is 10 times as bad - at a minimum," said Darryl Felder, a University of Louisiana at Lafayette biology professor.

The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration declined repeated efforts by The Associated Press to explain in detail its 210,000 gallon-a-day estimate, except to say "in the absence of direct measurements, NOAA made an estimate of flow rate based on aerial observations."

Initially, BP and the government put the leak at 42,000 gallons a day. That changed a couple of weeks ago to 210,000, which BP and government officials say they aren't changing.

"We've used satellite imagery, overflights, visual observation," said BP spokesman John Crabtree. "All the methods of calculating how much oil that's leaking are inexact."

Once the video came out, scientists looked at the flow and challenged each other to calculate how big it was.

Both Eugene Chiang, a professor of astronomy at University of California, Berkeley, and Timothy Crone of Columbia University said the spill falls somewhere between 840,000 gallons and 4.2 millions gallons a day, but couldn't pinpoint much beyond that.

"It's the same feeling you get when someone asks you how many jelly beans are in a jar," Chiang said. "I'm confident enough in it to say it is well above 5,000 barrels a day" - equal to more than 210,000 gallons daily.

Crone agreed the flow was almost certainly much higher than the government's estimate. "Whether it's twice, four times or 20 times I don't know," he said.

To make their estimates, the scientists essentially tracked particles or billows of oil across the video screen, then used the size of the pipes, particles and speed of the video to come up with a rate.

"It's an established method that's been around 25 years," said Carl Meinhart, an engineering professor at University of California Santa Barbara.

Meinhart did not make a calculation of his own, but was contacted by The Associated Press to assess the researchers' methodology. Under controlled lab conditions, the results are accurate within a couple percentage points, but that's not the case here, he said.

There are a lot of variables that can't be calculated because of the poor quality of the video and the lack of a sense of scale, he said.

Just eyeballing the video for the first time, Meinhart said he would guess a margin of error of plus or minus 20 percent on estimates.

One scientist who believes the government and BP have the right number is Paul Fischbeck at Carnegie Mellon, an engineering professor who also studies risk and regulation.

Just judging by the size of the slick - about 3,500 square miles - and the three weeks of the spill, 210,000 "looks about right as far as the slick goes," Fischbeck said.

If the higher estimates were right, there would be a much bigger slick, he said.

But some of the oil could be lingering under the water's surface. In previous cases, it's been as much as half of the spill, said University of California Berkeley engineering professor Bob Bea.

The environmental impact will be vastly different depending on the size of the spill, some experts agreed.

If the flow turns out to be closer to the higher end estimates, "that's a major catastrophe," Bea said. If it's closer to the government's estimate, it is something that can be handled.

Explore further: Dead floppy drive: Kenya recycles global e-waste

More information: National Academy of Sciences "Oil in the Sea" report summary: http://books.nap.edu/html/oil-in-the-sea/reportbrief.pdf

not rated yet
add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

BP oil leak 'much bigger than official estimates'

May 14, 2010

Much more oil is spewing into the Gulf of Mexico from a sunken British Petroleum oil rig than official estimates show, experts warned Friday as BP executives stuck to their guns and even tried to play down ...

BP struggles to cap leak as US oil slick spreads

Apr 26, 2010

British oil giant BP used robotic underwater vehicles Monday to try to cap a leaking well and prevent a growing oil slick in the Gulf of Mexico from developing into an environmental disaster.

Expert: Caution required for Gulf oil spill clean-up

May 04, 2010

With millions of gallons crude oil being spewed into the Gulf of Mexico from the Deepwater Horizon oil spill, the focus now is on shutting down the leak. However, in the cleanup efforts to come, "extreme caution" ...

BP, US search for new fix to US oil spill

May 10, 2010

BP officials desperately searched Monday for a new fix to the enormous Gulf of Mexico oil spill after efforts to cap a gushing leak with a containment dome hit a perilous snag.

Recommended for you

Dead floppy drive: Kenya recycles global e-waste

Aug 22, 2014

In an industrial area outside Kenya's capital city, workers in hard hats and white masks take shiny new power drills to computer parts. This assembly line is not assembling, though. It is dismantling some ...

New paper calls for more carbon capture and storage research

Aug 22, 2014

Federal efforts to reduce greenhouse gas emissions must involve increased investment in research and development of carbon capture and storage technologies, according to a new paper published by the University of Wyoming's ...

Coal gas boom in China holds climate change risks

Aug 22, 2014

Deep in the hilly grasslands of remote Inner Mongolia, twin smoke stacks rise more than 200 feet into the sky, their steam and sulfur billowing over herds of sheep and cattle. Both day and night, the rumble ...

User comments : 1

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

theophys
not rated yet May 17, 2010
I think that the rate of spill is irrelavent at this point in time. The main concerns now should be stopping the leak and cleaning up the spill. Later, once everything is under control, we can asses the overall magnitude of the spill and unleash rightous fury on those responsible. For now though, this particular debate isn't helping.