Exposed: The strange sex life of spiders

Apr 20, 2010
A spider clings to a rain filled web. Here's the good news: you are a male and you are allowed to have sex, at most, twice in your life. If that's the good news -- you may well ask -- what's the bad news? It's this: if you copulate for longer than 10 seconds, you get eaten by your sex partner. Thus is the challenge facing the male of the orb-web spider.

Here's the good news: you are a male and you are allowed to have sex, at most, twice in your life. If that's the good news -- you may well ask -- what's the bad news? It's this: if you copulate for longer than 10 seconds, you get eaten by your sex partner. Thus is the challenge facing the male of the orb-web spider, Argiope bruennichi, according to a scientific paper published on Wednesday.

The tiny, common European spider is best known for the classic wheel-like web beloved of children's drawings.

But beneath this cosy exterior the species has a terrifying tradition of sexual .

The males have a pair of mating organs, known as pedipalps, one of which they use for each copulation -- in other words, twice is their limit.

But females gobble up the much smaller males whenever they mate for longer than 10 seconds.

That means the male has to be pretty choosy about the fittest female on which he should confer his precious . But which one?

Seeking to find out, Klaas Welke and Jutta Schneider of the Zoological Institute in Hamburg, Germany, nurtured from eggs found in local meadows and fed the beasts on tasty morsels of fruitfly until adulthood.

"Only virgin spiders were used for the experiment," says the paper, reassuringly.

The spiders were then put to the test.

Males were put on a love couch either with a sister spider or an unrelated spider.

Time and again, males which were paired with a sibling copulated briefly, which meant they escaped cannibalism and lived to love another day.

But when they were paired with a non-sibling, the males' copulation went on for longer.

Yes, the males ended up getting eaten. But this way there was no risk of , as there would be by having spiderlings with his sister.

That meant the spider had a better chance for his offspring to be healthy and to survive.

"This suggests that males can adaptively adjust their (sexual) investment relating to the compatibility of a female," says the paper, which appears in Biology Letters, published by Britain's Royal Society.

Explore further: For bats and dolphins, hearing gene prestin adapted for echolocation

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

In spiders, size matters: Small males are more often meals

Sep 10, 2008

Female spiders are voracious predators and consume a wide range of prey, which sometimes includes their mates. A number of hypotheses have been proposed for why females eat males before or after mating. Researchers ...

The best both of worlds -- how to have sex and survive

Sep 20, 2007

Researchers have discovered that even the gruesome and brutal lifestyle of the Evarcha culicivora, a blood gorging jumping spider indigenous to East Africa, can’t help but be tempted by that ‘big is beautiful’ mantra ...

Mating that causes injuries

Feb 20, 2009

Researchers at Uppsala University can now show that what is good for one sex is not always good for the other sex. In fact, evolutionary conflicts between the two sexes cause characteristics and behaviors that are downright ...

Sex in the morning or the evening?

Jun 26, 2007

Most research on sexual conflict ignores the fact that the fitness pay-offs of mating may change drastically over a short timescale, for example over a single day.

Recommended for you

Why do snakes flick their tongues?

22 hours ago

Many people think a snake's forked tongue is creepy. Every so often, the snake waves it around rapidly, then retracts it. Theories explaining the forked tongues of snakes have been around for thousands of ...

User comments : 1

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

tkjtkj
3 / 5 (2) Apr 21, 2010
No such conclusion can be drawn. There is zero evidence presented that supports any contention that the non-sibling maters had any survival advantage whatsoever. Societal prejudice against sibling matings is just that .. although it can 'cost' the species a degree of 'loss of gene variability'. In fact, retaining/strengthening the existence of gene patterns that have proved beneficial (read: intelligence, etc) would be expected to impart advantage. So often, the fact that 'good' is inherited, too, is forgotten.

tkjtkj@gmail.com