New research suggests Sierra Nevadas older than previously thought

Jan 11, 2010 By Amina Khan

The Sierra Nevada mountain range reached its present height 50 million years ago -- 30 million years earlier than geologists once believed, according to a new study.

The research adds to a growing body of evidence that the Sierra Nevadas are far older than once thought and has implications for the evolution of the plants and animals in the West, as well as for the likely climate of ancient North America.

The study, by scientists at Yale University and the Berkeley Museum of Paleontology, used 50-million-year-old chemical traces left by microbes and rain droplets that fell onto ancient leaves to calculate the new height estimate for the Sierras at that time.

The western United States would have looked very different back then, filled with lush forests of vines and magnolias. The Pacific Ocean would have lapped the foot of the Sierras.

"This is a time period where there would have been crocodiles in Wyoming," said Michael Hren, lead author and a University of Michigan postdoctoral fellow who did the research while at Yale.

Sampling sites of ancient flood plains, the researchers found leaves still preserved in the oxygen-poor sediments. They analyzed the waxes produced on the surface of those ancient leaves, measuring levels of normal hydrogen and its slightly heavier isotope, , in the waxes. This gave them an estimate of the elevation at which the leaves grew.

As clouds rise up the side of mountains, water droplets containing the heavier isotope fall from them first, and droplets containing the lighter hydrogen, later. Thus, the lower the proportion of deuterium in waxes, the higher up the that leaf must have been, the scientists surmised.

Hren also looked at soil carried down from the mountains to the ancient floodplains, checking for chemicals left by microbes that lived in the sediments millions of years ago. These microorganisms changed the composition of their cell membranes depending on whether it was cool or hot -- providing a kind of ancient biological thermometer.

Using those data, the scientists estimated that the temperature there had been 6-8 degrees Celsius warmer than today.

The idea that the mountains were sitting at their current height 30 million years earlier than anticipated has implications for studies on the evolution of plants and animals, scientists said.

For example, with the mountains already in place so long ago, "how could animals migrate from California into the Great Basin?" said Paul Koch, chair of the Earth and Planetary Sciences Department at the University of California-Santa Cruz, who was not involved in the research. For understanding evolution of U.S. flora and fauna, "it matters a lot," he said.

The finding also has implications for historical climate estimates across North America. "Climate models require that you understand elevation. In Kansas it matters for you to get the topography of the right. In Florida it matters," Koch said.

The work, which was published in the journal Geology, also provides a more accurate tool for exploring the elevation of ancient landscapes, said Diane M. Erwin, a study co-author from the UC Berkeley Museum of Paleontology. In the past, such estimates have been made by studying leaf shapes. Such estimates can be less accurate than the deuterium method.

Putting together different pieces of data to create a coherent picture of the past is what drew him to the work, Hren said. "It's amazing to break open a rock and look at these amazingly preserved leaves that can tell you a story from 50 million years ago."

Explore further: NASA's HS3 looks Hurricane Edouard in the eye

4.5 /5 (2 votes)
add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Geologists search for prehistoric high

Aug 20, 2007

Not all areas of the Tibetan Plateau rose at the same time, according to researchers who are determining the past elevation of plateau locations by studying the remains of terrestrial plants that once grew there.

Origin of the Blue Mountains studied

Oct 30, 2007

A U.S. study suggests northern Oregon's Blue Mountains may have originated from the Klamath Mountains of southern Oregon and the Sierra Nevada of California.

Recommended for you

NASA's HS3 looks Hurricane Edouard in the eye

11 hours ago

NASA and NOAA scientists participating in NASA's Hurricane and Severe Storms Sentinel (HS3) mission used their expert skills, combined with a bit of serendipity on Sept. 17, 2014, to guide the remotely piloted ...

Tropical Storm Rachel dwarfed by developing system 90E

16 hours ago

Tropical Storm Rachel is spinning down west of Mexico's Baja California, and another tropical low pressure area developing off the coast of southwestern Mexico dwarfs the tropical storm. NOAA's GOES-West ...

NASA ocean data shows 'climate dance' of plankton

19 hours ago

The greens and blues of the ocean color from NASA satellite data have provided new insights into how climate and ecosystem processes affect the growth cycles of phytoplankton—microscopic aquatic plants ...

Glaciers in the grand canyon of Mars?

21 hours ago

For decades, planetary geologists have speculated that glaciers might once have crept through Valles Marineris, the 2000-mile-long chasm that constitutes the Grand Canyon of Mars. Using satellite images, ...

NASA support key to glacier mapping efforts

21 hours ago

Thanks in part to support from NASA and the National Science Foundation, scientists have produced the first-ever detailed maps of bedrock beneath glaciers in Greenland and Antarctica. This new data will help ...

User comments : 3

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

croghan26
not rated yet Jan 12, 2010
The article concentrates on plant/animal life on the approaches to the mountains. Does this discovery revise anything thinking about the geoglogical formation of the mountains?

Were tectonic plates does things earlier than expected/projected?

or, while the: "30 million years earlier than anticipated" may be significant in the life of flora and fauna - in geologic time it is a small consideration?
rwinners
not rated yet Jan 13, 2010
I would think that the geologic process that formed the Sierras were the same, no matter the time of occurence.
The Pacific and NA plates have been at each other for hundreds of millions of years. The now strike/slip San Andreas fault was once a thrust fault and probably will be again. In fact, it is probably just a matter of degree.
croghan26
not rated yet Jan 13, 2010
croghan whaps himself up side the head for letting:
"Were tectonic plates does things earlier than expected/projected?" slip by .. when he meant 'doing things".

Maybe it is just the wording of the story - but it does say the mountains are older than previously thought - apparently it is not the mountains that are older, it is the flora on the mountain sides.