Superior Super Earths

Nov 30, 2009 by Leslie Mullen
Astronomers are finding a variety of planets orbiting distant stars in the galaxy. Image credit: German Aerospace Center (DLR)

Super Earths are named for their size, but these planets - which range from about 2 to 10 Earth masses - could be superior to the Earth when it comes to sustaining life. They could also provide an answer to the ‘Fermi Paradox’: Why haven’t we been visited by aliens?

Astronomers have discovered hundreds of Jupiter-like planets in our galaxy. However, a handful of the planets found orbiting distant stars are more Earth-sized. This gives hope to astrobiologists, who think we are more likely to find life on rocky planets with liquid water.

The found so far are actually more massive than our own. Dimitar Sasselov, professor of astronomy at Harvard University, coined the term “Super-Earths” to reflect their mass rather than any superior qualities. But Sasselov says that these planets - which range from about 2 to 10 Earth masses - could be superior to the Earth when it comes to sustaining life.

On Shaky Ground

It is said that 99 percent of all species that ever lived have gone extinct. Earth, it seems, is a tough place to call home. Our planet has gone through Ice Ages and global warming trends, it has been hit by comets and asteroids (leading, in one case, to a that felled the mighty ), and the amount of oxygen in the atmosphere has risen and fallen over time. Our planet is always in a state of flux, and life must adapt to these changes or die.

The shifting of tectonic plates is another example of Earth’s restless nature. Continents bang together, forming mountains, only to be later torn apart. Islands grow from underwater volcanoes, and elements are liberated from rocks when they are melted beneath the crust.

While all this geologic activity makes us literally stand on shaky ground, scientists have come to believe that tectonics is one of the key features of our planet which makes life possible. If not for tectonics, carbon needed by life would stay locked within rocks.

Tectonics have reshaped the surface of our planet and altered the atmosphere over time. Scientists now think tectonics may be necessary for life to emerge on a planet. Image credit: USGS

The fear today is that too much carbon dioxide in the atmosphere will lead to global warming. Yet too little carbon dioxide in the atmosphere would make Earth a much colder place, and the photosynthetic plants and algae that rely on CO2 would perish. The demise of these oxygen-producing organisms would leave us all gasping for breath.

According to Sasselov, Earth’s mass helps keeps tectonics in action. The more massive a planet, the hotter its interior. slide on a layer of molten rock beneath the crust called the mantle. Convective currents within the mantle push the plates around. For smaller planets like Mars, the interior is not hot enough to drive tectonics.

Super Earths, with a larger and hotter interior, would have a thinner planetary crust placed under more stress. This probably would result in faster tectonics, as well as more earthquakes, volcanism, and other geologic upheavals. In fact, Sasselov says the plate tectonics on Super Earths may be so rapid that mountains and ocean trenches wouldn’t have much time to develop before the surface was again recycled.

Venus, only slightly less massive than Earth, has had a great deal of volcanic activity, but it does not appear to have tectonics. This may be because low mass planets need water to lubricate the process, and Venus lost its water long ago through evaporation. Sasselov says Earth has just enough water for tectonics to work. Tectonics on Super Earths might be so efficient that water isn’t even needed.

On the other hand, it’s possible that a SuperEarth could be entirely covered by water. Sasselov says that in the case of such an ocean world, most of the water will be in an exotic state known as iceVII -- a very compressed, hard ice with a melting point above 212 degrees Fahrenheit (100 degrees Celsius).

Whether made of rock or ice, Sasselov says Super Earths will be only 1 or 2 times the actual size of Earth because they become densely compressed as they gain mass. This higher density will result in greater gravity. Sasselov says the most massive Super Earth would have about 3 times the gravity of Earth. Tests of human resistance to vertical G-force, where the blood is pulled down to the legs, have found the typical person can tolerate up to 5 Gs before losing consciousness. So while you might feel much heavier walking on a Super Earth, the extra gravity wouldn’t be beyond what human explorers could endure. Of course, any life that evolved on a Super Earth would be adapted to the greater gravity, just as a human feels comfortable on the 1 G surface of Earth.

Habitable Hot Spots

This greater gravity means a Super Earth can easily hold onto an atmosphere, so it would not end up with a tenuous atmosphere like Mars. But the role of a planet’s atmosphere in creating prime conditions for life can be tricky. Venus has a surface temperature of nearly 900 F (480 C) due to the thick greenhouse atmosphere that doesn’t let heat escape.

Like Saturn’s moon Dione, a Super-Earth could be entirely covered in water ice. Image Credit: NASA/JPL/Space Science Institute

One of the biggest influences on a planet’s climate is the star it orbits. Earth has a circular orbit 150 million kilometers away from the Sun, a yellow dwarf star. This helps keep conditions warm enough so that our oceans don’t freeze over, but cool enough so that we don’t lose all our water through evaporation.

The Super Earths discovered so far orbit a variety of stars. The first Earth-like extrasolar planets ever found orbit a pulsar, a rotating neutron star that emits high energy radiation. The other Super Earths orbit stars that are smaller and cooler than our Sun.

Most of the known Super Earths are very close to their stars, closer than the planet Mercury is to the Sun. Even though these stars don’t burn as brightly as our Sun, the planets are so close they are like burnt cinders flickering close to a fire.

One such hot Super Earth is CoRoT 7-b (named for the CoRoT telescope that was used to locate the planet). CoRoT 7-b orbits the orange dwarf star TYC 4799-1733-1 once every 20 hours. This planet is nearly 5 times the mass of Earth, but is less than twice as big. This solar system has another hot Super Earth, CoRoT-7c, which is 8 times as massive as Earth and circles the star in 3 days and 17 hours.

For astrobiologists hoping to find alien life, two Super Earths orbiting the star Gliese 581 have potential. Gliese 581, a red dwarf star, is cooler than our Sun. Based on their orbit around this star, planets Gliese 581-c and Gliese 581-d are thought to have habitable conditions, although some think planet “c” might have a runaway greenhouse atmosphere like Venus.

Another aspect affecting the potential for life is the presence of a companion moon. Earth’s Moon helps balance our planet’s rotation on its axis. Sasselov notes that a Super Earth’s extra mass would give it a very stable rotation, so a moon would not be needed to help keep the planet in line.

This diagram shows the distances of the planets in our solar system (upper row) and in the Gliese 581 system (lower row), from their respective stars (left). The habitable zone is indicated as the blue area. Image Credit: ESO

Superior Alien Civilizations

Missions like the Kepler space telescope, launched just this year, could help astronomers find many Earth-like planets in the years to come. Sasselov estimates there could be a hundred million habitable Super Earth planets just in our Milky Way galaxy. He predicts we’ll find 50 to 100 Super Earth planets in the next 5 years.

The existence of so many Super Earths could explain the “Fermi Paradox” of why aliens have not contacted us. If our lower mass planet does not have the ideal conditions for life, alien explorers would be less likely to look to us, choosing instead to target the many Super Earths in the galaxy.

“Earth is a marginal planet when it comes to conditions we would like to see for complex life to sustain itself,” Sasselov notes. “In the family of Earth-like planets, the sweet spot for complex chemistry and biochemistry to emerge and sustain itself lies in planets larger than the Earth.”

If aliens on Super Earths ever decided to investigate Earth to see if such a tiny world could harbor life, they would have a harder time sending rockets into space because of the higher gravity on their planet. “This could be another answer to the Fermi Paradox,” says Sasselov, “but it’s not an insurmountable problem.” It could even be that because of their deeper gravity well, aliens living on Super Earths would have to develop a technology superior to our chemical rockets in order to explore the universe.

Sasselov’s own suggestion for the Fermi paradox relates to the age and evolution of planets in the universe. When the universe was young, only hydrogen and helium were available. Generations of stellar evolution were needed to produce the heavier elements, such as silica and iron, which build rocky . Even though the universe is approximately 14 billion years old, our solar system only formed about 4.6 billion years ago. (Astronomers did find a 12.7-billion-year-old Jupiter-mass object in our galaxy, but Sasselov thinks this so-called ancient planet could instead be the remnant of a red or brown dwarf star that was stripped of some of its mass.)

If other rocky worlds with life are about as young as we are, then perhaps the lack of visiting spaceships indicates there are no ancient, highly advanced alien civilizations out there.

“Most life emerges on Super-Earths with habitable potential, but Super-Earths started forming in the galaxy only relatively recently, and few technical civilizations have managed to emerge since,” Sasselov says.


Join PhysOrg.com on Facebook!
Follow PhysOrg.com on Twitter!
Source: Astrobio.net, by Leslie Mullen

Explore further: Innovative use of pressurant extends MESSENGER's mission, enables collection of new data

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Earth: A Borderline Planet for Life?

Jan 09, 2008

Our planet is changing before our eyes, and as a result, many species are living on the edge. Yet Earth has been on the edge of habitability from the beginning. New work by astronomers at the Harvard-Smithsonian ...

'Super Earths' Will Have Plate Tectonics, Scientists Predict

Nov 21, 2007

The discoveries of large Earth-like planets outside our Solar System, so-called “super-Earths,” has prompted much speculation about just how Earth-like they may be. Recently, scientists from Harvard University suggested ...

Tides Have Major Impact on Planet Habitability

Oct 13, 2008

(PhysOrg.com) -- Astronomers searching for rocky planets that could support life in other solar systems should look outside, as well as within, the so-called "habitable zone," University of Arizona planetary ...

Some Super-Earths Form in Super Snowstorms

Oct 11, 2006

The 200 known planets that orbit other stars exhibit incredible variety. Among them are a handful of worlds that weigh between 5 and 15 times Earth. Astronomers believe these "super-Earths" are rocky iceballs rather than ...

A trio of super-Earths

Jun 16, 2008

Today, at an international conference, a team of European astronomers announced a remarkable breakthrough in the field of extra-solar planets. Using the HARPS instrument at the ESO La Silla Observatory, they ...

A new era in search for 'sister Earths'?

Jul 25, 2008

Research presented at a recent astronomical conference is being hailed as ushering in a new era in the search for Earth-like planets by showing that they are more numerous than previously thought and that ...

Recommended for you

The top 101 astronomical events to watch for in 2015

Dec 24, 2014

Now in its seventh year of compilation and the second year running on Universe Today, we're proud to feature our list of astronomical happenings for the coming year. Print it, bookmark it, hang it on your ...

NASA image: Frosty slopes on Mars

Dec 24, 2014

This image of an area on the surface of Mars, approximately 1.5 by 3 kilometers in size, shows frosted gullies on a south-facing slope within a crater.

User comments : 15

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

moj85
5 / 5 (2) Nov 30, 2009
Is that final line wit from the scientist?
How refreshing..

“Most life emerges on Super-Earths with habitable potential, but Super-Earths started forming in the galaxy only relatively recently, and few technical civilizations have managed to emerge since,” Sasselov says.
yyz
5 / 5 (2) Nov 30, 2009
The first 2/3 of the article seems to have some logical arguments laid out discussing formation and history of Super-Earths. What happened with the 'Superior Alien Civilizations' section?

“Earth is a marginal planet when it comes to conditions we would like to see for complex life to sustain itself". Compared to life where?

“Most life emerges on Super-Earths with habitable potential, but Super-Earths started forming in the galaxy only relatively recently, and few technical civilizations have managed to emerge since,” These seem like pretty sweeping (unproven) statements compared to the rest of the piece. These sound more like postulates rather than statement of fact.
nuge
4.5 / 5 (4) Nov 30, 2009
I'm pretty sure they are postulates rather than statements of fact, but unfortunately the author of the article didn't express them that way.

This is very interesting. According to this article, we might be a very unique intelligent species in the universe, after all - tall and graceful, but relatively weak, in comparison with most others. Our ability to colonise these super-Earths and/or interact with other species that live on them may depend on genetic engineering, as it would be very uncomfortable staying in 2G for extended periods.

However, IMO the moons of gas giants are the places to look.
axemaster
5 / 5 (3) Nov 30, 2009
"aliens living on Super Earths would have to develop a technology superior to our chemical rockets in order to explore the universe"

That's not exactly difficult... they would merely need to use nuclear powered rockets. And given that we have so far utterly failed to "explore the universe" in our relatively advanced state, the prospect of meeting anybody else out there is pretty slim.
probes
2 / 5 (3) Dec 01, 2009
"However, IMO the moons of gas giants are the places to look." - I agree and also think that we can use VASIMR engines to get to these moons, possibly in as little as 3.9 days.
Eraelan
not rated yet Dec 01, 2009
I'm not sure that I understand the tectonics section of this article. How can one consider faster tectonics to be superior to that of Earth's? Wouldn't the increased "geologic upheavals" (assuming rocky surface) make is more difficult of for complex life to start, despite the increase in available carbon? And as for the "iceVII", why does Sasselov assume that watery Superearths will have this kind of "land" structure? And as an aside, I've have not heard of "iceVII" before now. It this a only a theoretical state of water, or has it been created/observed in a lab setting?
nuge
not rated yet Dec 01, 2009
EraeIan:

IMO the presence of the right gases is probably more important for life than tectonic stability.

Also,

http://en.wikiped.../Ice_VII

NotAsleep
1 / 5 (4) Dec 01, 2009
Is there a reason that we're not assuming these planets could spin faster or slower than our own? This would decrease or increase the effects of gravity, negating the "super species" potential. I'll be the first to say: WE are the super species because our planet is the slowest spinning planet in the universe capable of life!
Daein
1 / 5 (2) Dec 01, 2009
Most of this is pretty unfounded I think. Earth's tectonics has a lot to do with our large moon rather than the size of our planet. Look at Io, it has all kinds of geologic activity because it's being squeezed by Jupiter and it's other moons, and it's only the size of our moon. I think Venus is also pretty good evidence for this since it has no tectonics and is only slightly smaller than earth. Water "lubricating" the tectonics is a pretty poor explanation, since there is no real supporting evidence for it. Also as Eraelan points out increased tectonics isn't always a good thing. Sure slow tectonics keeps life sustainable, but the increased geologic activity would probably also result in more mass extinctions cause by things like mantle plumes.
Ronan
3 / 5 (2) Dec 01, 2009
Interesting article--although, it doesn't give the hypothetical extraterrestrial beasties much credit for intelligence. Sure, they'd be more likely to look for life on other super-Earths--but not exclusively! I mean, look at us. In our own searches (mostly hypothetical, sadly, but...) for extraterrestrial, we aren't ignoring everything until we come across another perfect Earth-mimic. We acknowledge and speculate that there's at least a possibility of life on worlds vastly different than our own (Mars, Venus' upper atmosphere, Europa, etc.). Why should an extraterrestrial be less willing to look beyond their own native conditions?
Damon_Hastings
3.8 / 5 (4) Dec 01, 2009
Sasselov’s own suggestion for the Fermi paradox relates to the age and evolution of planets in the universe. ...If other rocky worlds with life are about as young as we are, then perhaps the lack of visiting spaceships indicates there are no ancient, highly advanced alien civilizations out there.

I have a much simpler explanation for the Fermi paradox (the question of why we haven't detected alien civilizations.) It's because radio signals are a crude, primitive, lossy, energy-inefficient, and slow means of communication. Why would we expect aliens to use them? Likewise, why would we expect them to land here and shake our hand? We're pretty crude and primitive ourselves.
Damon_Hastings
4 / 5 (4) Dec 01, 2009
I'm not sure that I understand the tectonics section of this article. How can one consider faster tectonics to be superior to that of Earth's? Wouldn't the increased "geologic upheavals" (assuming rocky surface) make is more difficult of for complex life to start, despite the increase in available carbon?

Nope. A volcanic eruption will briefly sterilize a small area; no big deal. A supervolcano might throw up enough ash to block some sunlight for a few centuries, but life can adapt. Not all life even needs sunlight.

And as for the "iceVII", why does Sasselov assume that watery Superearths will have this kind of "land" structure?

Um... what land structure?

Is this a only a theoretical state of water, or has it been created/observed in a lab setting?

Created in lab. Water has 15 known phases at various temperatures and pressures (see "Phases" at http://en.wikiped...wiki/Ice ) -- water is incredible stuff!
Aliensarethere
3 / 5 (2) Dec 01, 2009

I have a much simpler explanation for the Fermi paradox (the question of why we haven't detected alien civilizations.) It's because radio signals are a crude, primitive, lossy, energy-inefficient, and slow means of communication. Why would we expect aliens to use them? Likewise, why would we expect them to land here and shake our hand? We're pretty crude and primitive ourselves.


Because the aliens would use a simple communication technology which most civilizations could pick up.
It would be rather dumb to send signals with a state of the art high-tech beamer nobody could receive, don't you think ?

We must assume they are quite clever, the aliens, or else they wouldn't be able to mesage us in the first place.
LuckyBrandon
4 / 5 (2) Dec 02, 2009
no sure if its been said...but on the plate tectonics topic here people keep referencing...the only reference I saw to it in the article above is that the plate tectonics release carbon necessary to form carbon based life into the atmosphere to make it available to the life here, whereas without plate movements, it would have been locked in the ground.....
Plate tectonics being necessary to release carbon would ONLY be necessary for carbon based lifeforms. Albeit, we have found no other kinds so far (as far as I know), it doesn't mean that's all there is....
Javin
not rated yet Dec 07, 2009
A relatively small planet with an extremely limited amount of natural resources. Which we are purging from this planet as this is typed. Hmm. Why would they want to stop here? Most anything of value is either used or in use. I say that because any space-faring civilization, with the technology to roam the systems, is not looking for friends. More likely, they would have depleted their resources and have continually jumped from habitable planet to habitable planet. But really, who knows?

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.