A line on string theory

Nov 12, 2009 by By Alvin Powell
A major problem with string theory is that it has never been confirmed experimentally, which is where Donner Professor of Science Cumrun Vafa and the Large Hadron Collider (LHC) come in. Photo: Stephanie Mitchell/Harvard Staff Photographer

(PhysOrg.com) -- A Harvard theoretical physicist has discussed with scientists at the Large Hadron Collider in Switzerland the possibility that they may discover a theorized "stau" particle, with a lifetime of a minute or so, that could provide the first experimental confirmation of string theory.

String theory, developed in the late 1960s and early ’70s, is a theoretical physicists’ multitool, explaining in one model all four of the universe’s main forces: gravity, electromagnetism, and the two that operate inside , the strong force and the weak force.

Without string theory, physicists need two theories to explain how the universe works. explains gravity, while the other three basic forces are explained by the “standard model.” Moreover, gravity has been very difficult to reconcile with , a problem for which string theory offers a solution.

A major problem with string theory, however, is that it has never been confirmed experimentally, which is where Donner Professor of Science Cumrun Vafa and the (LHC) come in.

Several years of work with graduate student Jonathan Heckman, who graduated in June, and other colleagues, has led Vafa to suggest that a particle whose properties are predicted by string theory may be detectable at the energy levels produced by the LHC.

The LHC is the world’s largest particle collider, located in a 16.8-mile-long underground ring that runs from Switzerland under the border into France and back. Once it is fully operational, it should be able to smash beams of protons into each other with an energy of 14 trillion electron volts, seven times more powerful than the current highest-power collider, the at the Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory in Illinois.

After glitches and equipment failures marred the LHC’s start last year, operators are trying again this month. In late October, scientists at , the European Organization for Nuclear Research, were celebrating the first particles to enter sectors of the accelerator since it was shut down.

Operators expect a gradual ramp-up of activity, first circling beams, then creating low-power collisions, and slowly increasing the collisions’ energy. Vafa isn’t the only Harvard faculty member eagerly anticipating the LHC start-up. Harvard experimental physicists have lent a hand to build ATLAS, one of the two main detectors there. Other theoretical physicists, including Lisa Randall, the Frank Baird Jr. Professor of Science, and Howard Georgi, the Mallinckrodt Professor of Physics, also await the light that the LHC will shed on their work.

Most physicists expect the LHC will discover the elusive particle known as “Higgs,” which is the origin of mass for all known particles. One major remaining question is what else the LHC might discover.

Vafa traveled to CERN in late October to discuss with teams of scientists at the two main detectors on what else they might see. If the assumptions that he and Heckman make in the context of string theory are valid, Vafa said, the two lightest of the new particles are the gravitino and the stau. The gravitino, however, is so weakly interactive that it is hard to produce directly, Vafa said. A stau particle, however, is easier to produce and should be semi-stable, lasting as long as a minute. And it should leave a signature track — unexplainable by any of the already-observed particles — as it streaks across the LHC’s detectors.
“It would be the smoking gun for our stringy models,” Vafa said.

While Vafa and Heckman’s work predicts there is a good likelihood of generating a stau particle, there is also a less likely possibility that a semi-stable neutral particle will be generated. If the particle proves neutral, it won’t manifest itself in a way that the LHC’s detectors would see. It could still be found, but indirectly. If the particle is created and escapes the accelerator, it would manifest as missing energy and could be located as scientists tally their experimental results.

Vafa and Heckman came up with their stau conclusion by winnowing the many possibilities in string theory. One difficulty of the theory, Vafa said, is its flexibility. String theory has hundreds of variables, which he described as “dials” that physicists can turn up and down to generate innumerable possible universes.

While that is interesting to theoreticians, Vafa said, it can also muddy the theoretical search for one universe: ours.

Vafa and Heckman devised two constraints that greatly narrowed the possible string universes. First, they assumed that gravity does not have to play a role in the unification of the other three forces. And second, they assumed that one property of string theory, called supersymmetry, is present at the energy levels generated by the LHC.

If string theory is correct, our universe is made up not of particles, as has been generally taught, but of tiny vibrating strings. The different vibrations manifest themselves as the familiar particles and forces that students learn about in physics class.

In addition to string theory’s ability to encompass gravity and the other forces in one framework, it can also fill a second important theoretical gap in understanding the universe, by explaining all the missing matter.

The known constellation of particles under conventional theories — electrons, quarks, neutrinos, and the like — can only account for about a sixth of the matter in the universe. The rest of it is made up of theorized “dark matter,” whose form remains unknown.

Dark matter is explained in string theory by the concept of supersymmetry. Supersymmetry, which was first discovered in the context of , holds that for each known particle there is a corresponding particle of different spin. At the time of the big bang, the theory says, the paired particles had similar properties such as mass and charge, but as the universe cooled off, the symmetry got broken. Now, according to the theory, in our broken-symmetry universe, the supersymmetric particles have much higher masses than their known partners. This higher mass also would explain why scientists haven’t seen them yet, since particle colliders must generate more energy than they have been able to do to create them. In the stringy models of Vafa and Heckman, the gravitino, which is predicted to be about 100 times more massive than the electron, comprises the bulk of the dark matter.

With the start-up of the LHC, Vafa said, science may be on the threshold of energies needed to create new supersymmetric , and of gaining a new understanding of the universe.

“I think it’s probably the most exciting experiment we’ll see in our lifetimes,” Vafa said of the LHC. “We’ll be excited by whatever they find — whether or not they confirm our predictions — because it’s the truth of nature, and it will teach us about the fundamental ways nature works.”

More information: lhc.web.cern.ch/lhc/

Provided by Harvard University (news : web)

Explore further: Nike krypton laser achieves spot in Guinness World Records

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Physicists Develop Test for 'String Theory'

Jan 23, 2007

For decades, scientists have taken issue with “string theory”—a theory of the universe which contends that the fundamental forces and matter of nature can be reduced to tiny one-dimensional filaments called strings—because ...

Looking for neutralinos at the Large Hadron Collider

Jul 09, 2008

“We are looking at the heavens, and using the very biggest things to help up predict what will happen with the very smallest things,” David Toback tells PhysOrg.com. Toback is a professor at Texas A&M University in Col ...

Superstring theory useful for experimental physics

Oct 30, 2009

Superstring theory aims to explain the laws of physics from extremely small strings in various states. Theoretical superstring theory is therefore normally not considered to be particularly relevant for practical ...

Discovery prospects at the Large Hadron Collider

Apr 24, 2006

Will scientists ever find the elusive Higgs particle, the last of the fundamental particles predicted by the Standard Model of particle physics and postulated to play a major role in how fundamental particles ...

Michigan integral to world's largest physics experiment

Sep 05, 2008

After 20 years of construction, a machine that could either verify or nullify the prevailing theory of particle physics is about to begin its mission. CERN's epic Large Hadron Collider (LHC) project currently involves 25 ...

Recommended for you

First in-situ images of void collapse in explosives

51 minutes ago

While creating the first-ever images of explosives using an x-ray free electron laser in California, Los Alamos researchers and collaborators demonstrated a crucial diagnostic for studying how voids affect ...

New approach to form non-equilibrium structures

20 hours ago

Although most natural and synthetic processes prefer to settle into equilibrium—a state of unchanging balance without potential or energy—it is within the realm of non-equilibrium conditions where new possibilities lie. ...

Nike krypton laser achieves spot in Guinness World Records

22 hours ago

A set of experiments conducted on the Nike krypton fluoride (KrF) laser at the U.S. Naval Research Laboratory (NRL) nearly five years ago has, at long last, earned the coveted Guinness World Records title for achieving "Highest ...

User comments : 15

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

Alexa
2 / 5 (4) Nov 12, 2009
Many people argument the risk of black holes formation in LHC by fact, cosmic rays can be way, way more energetic - and we still didn't find any trace of black hole during cosmic ray events yet.

Why not - but this argument can be reversed easily. If the long-lived stau does exist, it should already have been found in secondary cosmic rays. It hasn't, so it probably does not exist. Or the above argument is wrong...;-)
Alexa
1.5 / 5 (2) Nov 12, 2009
Tauon particle is ultraheavy electron, composed of pair of strange quarks. Analogously to muon, it could catalyze high temperature fusion of lithium and beryllium atom nuclei - so it was proposed for explanation of missing lithium problem in BigBang model. This prediction means, if we collect sufficient amount of tau particles, the resulting cluster of tauons could survive for minutes, thus becoming strangelet. IMO there are better adepts for strangelets, composed of neutral and more stable particles, then just tauons. The optimal approach should balance the stability of both strangelet, both its precursors.
Torbjorn_Larsson_OM
2 / 5 (1) Nov 12, 2009
IANASP, but I don't think the cosmic ray energy make up for the rate. AFAIU the LHC isn't just higher energy, it's way, way more particles and collisions than earlier accelerators to hunt scarce and/or high energy events at low enough energy.
Torbjorn_Larsson_OM
3 / 5 (2) Nov 12, 2009
IIRC there is no longer any lithium prediction out of whack, some astronomers found out how to models stars to account for their spectra. As in, the lithium was convected deeper as I remember it. I don't have the ref but it must be googeable if one is interested.

[So more properly, it was never a cosmological model problem. The observations was misleading.]
crycek
1 / 5 (1) Nov 12, 2009
Wasn't there an article on this site a while ago, having to do with super conductivity at high temperatures, or something like that, that was supposed to be the first experimental evidence of string theory, or could only be explained with string theory.
Slotin
3 / 5 (2) Nov 12, 2009
Supersymmetric algebra can be incorporated into whatever else quantum field theory including Standard Model and LQG - which effectivelly means, it cannot serve as an evidence of whatever theory, including string theory. Superalgebra is spinor extension of quantum mechanics.
neiorah
1 / 5 (3) Nov 13, 2009
I want to know what makes up the mass of the "Higgs". Are they positing that it is energy and if you have enough of it, you get mass? I doubt if they will ever find the smallest unit of mass because a smaller unit makes up its mass.
out7x
3 / 5 (1) Nov 13, 2009
Just to show how big a mistake cancelling the SSC was years ago.
Alexa
1 / 5 (4) Nov 13, 2009
how big a mistake cancelling the SSC was years
Such dangerous research wouldn't help economy in any way.
Alexa
not rated yet Nov 13, 2009
4d space-time supersymmetry was first discovered by Golfand-Likhtman (in 1970, published in 1971) and Akulov-Volkov (1971/72). Independently, in 1971 Gervais and Sakita recognized a version of 2d world-sheet supersymmetry in the new fermionic string theory. This led to Wess and Zumino rediscovering 4d supersymmetry in 1973.

http://cerncourie...rn/28388
BXCellent
5 / 5 (1) Nov 13, 2009
Lots of inconsistencies / inaccuracies in the article. For example:
"Without string theory, physicists need two theories to explain how the universe works" - there are other approaches to unifying gravity and quantum theory
"the elusive particle known as “Higgs,” which is the origin of mass for all known particles" - this is only theory saying it "is" the origin of mass is inaccurate
As mentioned in other comments, SUSY was discovered prior to and is independent of String Theory, so proving supersymmetry does not prove String Theory.
Alexa
not rated yet Nov 13, 2009
The optimal approach should balance the stability of both strangelet, both its precursors
IMO s-muon is a better candidate for SUSY detection and in fact it was observed already in form of muon pairs on Tevatron before year, i.e. in simmilar way, like top-quark pairs in 2008. Formal theory is one thing - the understanding where to look for it is another one.
Alexa
not rated yet Nov 13, 2009
Interesting point of these extrapolations (predictions/postdictions) is, I'm foreshadowing the future interpretation of the past events. Couldn't it be an example of situation, in which future affects the past - which was predicted by some quantum theorists recently?

http://arxiv.org/abs/0707.1919
david_42
not rated yet Nov 14, 2009
If the gravitino had a mass only 100 times that of an electron, we would found it ages ago. Should have been 100,000 times.
Alexa
not rated yet Nov 19, 2009
Such particle may be quite sparse and weekly interacting. You can consider them a particles of dark matter, at least formally.

http://physicswor...ws/40446