Altruism: Genetic or Cultural Evolution?

Oct 23, 2009

(PhysOrg.com) -- The origins of altruism, the willingness to make personal sacrifices for the benefit of others often unknown to us, has perplexed evolutionary social scientists and biologists for years.

Why do people willingly to go to war, give blood, contribute to food banks and make other sacrifices often at considerable risk to themselves and their descendents? Evolutionary explanations based on both genes and culture have been proposed for this , which is unique among vertebrates.

In all likelihood, it is evolutionary forces acting on socially learned behavior (culture), a group of UC Davis researchers argue in a paper published this month in the .

The group, led by Adrian Bell, a doctoral candidate in ecology, based its conclusion on estimates of the degree of genetic and cultural variation found between groups versus within groups. Natural selection acts and depends on variation.

“Our numbers show … and we argue that socially learned beliefs, or our culture as we define it here, is a much better candidate to explain the pro-social tendencies that humans have in large-scale societies,” Bell says. The main reason for that is that between groups are much greater than genetic differences.

Bell prepared the paper, which appears in the Oct. 13 issue, with co-authors Peter J. Richerson, a professor emeritus in the Department of Environmental Science and Policy, and Richard McElreath, an associate professor in the Department of Anthropology.

More information: rather than genes provides greater scope for the evolution of large-scale human prosociality, PNAS 2009 106:17671-17674; published online before print October 12, 2009, doi:10.1073/pnas.0903232106

Provided by UC Davis (news : web)

Explore further: Power can corrupt even the honest

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Language driven by culture, not biology

Jan 20, 2009

(PhysOrg.com) -- Language in humans has evolved culturally rather than genetically, according to a study by UCL (University College London) and US researchers. By modelling the ways in which genes for language might have ...

Study: Gorillas also have culture

Feb 21, 2006

U.S. scientists reportedly have identified the hallmark of culture -- behavior passed on by social rather than genetic influences -- among gorillas.

Competition, loss of selfishness mark shift to supersociety

Jun 11, 2007

How social or altruistic behavior evolved has been a central and hotly debated question, particularly by those researchers engaged in the study of social insect societies – ants, bees and wasps. In these groups, this question ...

New Keys to Keeping a Diverse Planet

Sep 25, 2007

Variation in plants and animals gives us a rich and robust assemblage of foods, medicines, industrial materials and recreation activities. But human activities are eliminating biological diversity at an unprecedented rate.

Recommended for you

Power can corrupt even the honest

7 hours ago

When appointing a new leader, selectors base their choice on several factors and typically look for leaders with desirable characteristics such as honesty and trustworthiness. However once leaders are in power, can we trust ...

Learning at 10 degrees north

8 hours ago

Secluded beaches, calypso music and the entertaining carnival are often what come to mind when thinking of the islands of Trinidad and Tobago. But Dal Earth Sciences students might first consider Trinidad's ...

How to find the knowns and unknowns in any research

9 hours ago

Have you ever felt overloaded by information? Ever wondered how to make sense of claims and counter-claims about a topic? With so much information out there on many different issues, how is a person new to ...

Minorities energize US consumer market, according to report

9 hours ago

The buying power of minority groups in the U.S. has reached new heights and continues to outpace cumulative inflation, according to the latest Multicultural Economy Report from the Selig Center for Economic Growth at the ...

User comments : 8

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

otto1923
not rated yet Oct 23, 2009
Dawkins, Pinker et al make the point for the selfish desire of genes to replicate themselves. But to do so they need a mate, chosen from a suitable pool of favorable genetic stuff. It seems to me that altruism must stem from the mutual need to maintain this pool for ourselves and our descendents. Instead of 'why altruism?' we should substitute 'why sex?'. This idea cant be original. Who has explored this?
bhiestand
not rated yet Oct 23, 2009
"Why sex?" has been explored quite a bit, although names of researchers or papers are escaping me at the moment... My brain seems to have failed me, as I was just reading a paper about it the other night. PBS took a good look at it here: http://www.pbs.or...dex.html and you should be able to find a ton more.

Basically, sexual reproduction mixes the genes and gives offspring higher survival chances. There was a recent experiment on a particular creature, I think it was a flatworm, that could reproduce either sexually or asexually--the sexually reproduced offspring fared better because of the genetic diversity.
bhiestand
not rated yet Oct 23, 2009
I should also add that it also probably has some other intrinsic values, such as being able to pick which genes you want your offspring to have, etc. Even if asexual reproduction offered the same genetic variation as sexual reproduction, it wouldn't allow for mate selection.

That may not be the proper evolutionary approach, but I hope it helps.
ArtflDgr
not rated yet Oct 23, 2009
in order for altruism to form the genetic ability to outcompete and have extra capacity (profit) that one could then grant. the granting of extra capacity over time would sort out how it would be favored, with the acts that were returning less and resulting in less output (fertile) would decline and those that resulted in more output, would increase.

thought is not solid enough to drive evolution, evolution of thought tendencies creates the behavior and thought adapts to it to make it reasonable.

those that dont have as much altruism do not think this, but they will rationalize a reason why if thye notice the difference.

the mind adapts to the differences that arize out of genetic variation. if your deaf in one ear, the mind adapts. if your missing your foot, the mind adapts.

minds flexibility is to adapt functionally to the body so that it maximizes fitness (in the abstract).

not enough room to explain... sigh
Paradox
not rated yet Oct 24, 2009
Evolutionary explanations based on both genes and culture have been proposed for this human behavior, which is unique among vertebrates.


I hope that this isn't trying to imply that this is a purely human behavior, because animals also show this behavior.
bhiestand
not rated yet Oct 24, 2009
Good call, Paradox, I didn't even catch that!
ArtflDgr
not rated yet Oct 24, 2009
and paradox's statements would imply that these behaviors come way before higher complicated thoughts that can then back track and get it wrong. :)
satyricon
not rated yet Oct 25, 2009
"..which is unique among vertebrates"... isn't this observed in non-vertebrates as well?