US coal peak production: Point and counterpoint

Oct 20, 2009

A timely debate on "United States Coal Peak Production" will enliven the annual meeting of the Geological Society of America in Portland, Oregon, today. Highly regarded experts David B. Rutledge of the California Institute of Technology and Robert C. Milici from the U.S. Geological Survey will be keynote speakers presenting opposing views.

Coal peak production has been a seriously debated topic for the past few years outside the coal-science community. "We hope to spur science-based discussions by membership of the coal geology and geology and health communities," said session co-chair Romeo Flores. "Regardless of the magnitude of coal peak production, there will be a commensurate effect with respect to the overall environmental impact on CO2 emissions from coal-fired power plants and its relation to global climate change, health, and economic growth."

Dr. Rutledge's impact on the subject of coal peak production began with a critical assessment of the world's coal reserves by the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, which he estimated to be much lower than previous calculations. His newly created model, using principles from M. King Hubbert's concept of oil peak production, projects ultimate coal production to 665 billion metric tons. This amounts to 59 percent of the corresponding number of reserves, which the World Energy Council estimated as 847 billion metric tons of coal as of year-end 2005. Thus, if the lesser estimate of world coal reserves is indeed the most reliable, then the resulting lesser amounts of CO2 ultimately emitted will tend to mitigate future impacts on global climate change. The National Research Council's Committee on Coal Research, Technology, and Resource Assessments agrees with many of Dr. Rutledge's criticisms but maintains positive coal reserves scenario.

The highlight of these criticisms was presented at the 2008 American Geophysical Union Fall meeting in which he suggested that governments have overestimated coal reserves. Find more information at http://rutledge.caltech.edu/.

Dr. Milici and co-authors Romeo Flores and Gary Stricker (also USGS), also using M. King Hubbert's methodology for estimating peak oil production, apply several estimates of potential coal reserves to calculate peak coal production for the United States. Reserve depletion is related to economic factors rather than to physical exhaustion of the remaining coal in the ground. However, because the amount of coal in the U.S. that may be considered as a potential reserve is uncertain, they estimate that peak U.S. coal production will occur sometime between the years of 2062 and 2105. Additional digital coal resource studies are essential so that we can reduce the uncertainty in our coal reserve estimates, and make informed decision on future energy supply.

At present, most of the coal produced in the U.S. comes from several large mines in the Powder River Basin in Wyoming. As the coals reserves at these large mines are exhausted within the next few decades, coal production will be replaced either by developing new reserves locally or by the opening of new mines elsewhere within remaining large blocks of economically producible coal. As these more economically producible coal deposits are exhausted, production costs will rise until at some point other methods of producing electric power will become economically more competitive, and eventually replace as a primary source for electricity.

Source: Geological Society of America

Explore further: Gold rush an ecological disaster for Peruvian Amazon

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

European power plants boosting coal use

Apr 24, 2008

High oil and natural gas prices, coupled with increased demand, are driving Europe's return to coal-fired power plants, an industry official says.

Study: Size of U.S. coal reserves in doubt

Jun 21, 2007

U.S. scientists are calling for increased federal support to obtain a more accurate assessment of the extent and location of the nation's coal reserves.

Clean coal plants mired by cost and delays

Dec 27, 2007

Clean coal-fired plants offer a cleaner fuel source but construction costs and increased greenhouse gas standards in the United States hamper their production.

Ultra-clean coal to power a greener future

May 13, 2005

Engineers in Nottingham are developing ultra-clean coal that could make power generation 50% more efficient and reduce carbon dioxide emissions by a third. A team at The University of Nottingham is one of only two in the ...

Recommended for you

Gold rush an ecological disaster for Peruvian Amazon

12 hours ago

A lush expanse of Amazon rainforest known as the "Mother of God" is steadily being destroyed in Peru, with the jungle giving way to mercury-filled tailing ponds used to extract the gold hidden underground.

Australia out of step with new climate momentum

14 hours ago

Australian Prime Minister Tony Abbott, who rose to power in large part by opposing a tax on greenhouse gas emissions, is finding his country isolated like never before on climate change as the U.S., China ...

User comments : 1

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

GrayMouser
not rated yet Oct 20, 2009
As these more economically producible coal deposits are exhausted, production costs will rise until at some point other methods of producing electric power will become economically more competitive, and eventually replace coal as a primary source for electricity.

Can we say "nuclear power"?

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.