Senate climate-change bill to be unveiled this week

Sep 29, 2009 By Robert Schroeder

Two top Senate Democrats are set to introduce a climate-change bill this week that would put new limits on carbon emissions, as world leaders prepare for a climate summit in Denmark after agreement last week by the G20 nations on phasing out subsidies for fossil fuels.

Sens. Barbara Boxer, the California Democrat who chairs the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee, and John Kerry, D-Mass., will reportedly unveil their bill on Wednesday after months of closed-door meetings. The bill will be modeled largely on legislation passed by the House of Representatives in June that aims to cut by 17 percent by 2020 and more than 80 percent by 2050 compared to 2005 levels, reported ClimateWire and other publications.

But it's unclear how far the bill will get this year, or how fast. The bill from Kerry and Boxer would come as senators are intensely busy with health-care legislation, President Barack Obama's top domestic priority. Obama is aiming to sign a health-care overhaul this year that would cut costs and cover the uninsured.

At the same time, the Boxer-Kerry bill also comes just over two months before a Dec. 7 meeting in Copenhagen, where world leaders are hoping to finalize a new agreement to reduce greenhouse gases. At last week's G20 meeting in Pittsburgh, leaders pledged to "intensify (their) efforts, in cooperation with other parties, to reach agreement in Copenhagen." They also agreed to slash subsidies in the "medium term" for oil and other as part of their fight against global warming.

But observers say there is little time for Congress to finish a bill before the Copenhagen conference.

"I don't think expectations are that a bill will be signed, sealed and delivered by that point," says Environmental Defense Fund spokesman Tony Kreindler. "There's not a lot of legislating room between now and December."

Indeed, a climate-change bill faces a steep uphill climb in the Senate after passing the House on a narrow 219 to 212 vote in June. Republicans have consistently portrayed Democrats' efforts to reduce global warming as a tax on families and businesses, and say it will lead to loss of jobs and U.S. competitiveness. Moreover, Democrats from industry-heavy states like Michigan and Ohio want breaks for manufacturing industries that would be affected by the legislation's caps on emissions.

Obama argues that the House bill will create jobs through new energy investments, but critics say the "cap and trade" system at the heart of the bill amounts to a tax. Under the "cap and trade" system, companies would buy and sell permits to meet emissions limits.

Kerry, who chairs the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, said last week that the bill would be a "starting point" to win over moderate and conservative Democrats as well as Republicans, reported ClimateWire.

"I have no pretensions, and neither does Barbara, that this will be the final product. It is a starting point, a commitment, full-fledged, across party lines to do what we need to do to protect the planet for the next century," Kerry said last week. Hearings on the bill are expected early next month.

Meanwhile, senators' focus on health-care legislation has delayed two energy-related congressional hearings originally scheduled for this week. Hearings in the Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee about the economic effects of climate change legislation and managing federal forests in response to climate change "will be rescheduled as soon as possible," according to a committee statement on Monday.

The committee's chairman, Sen. Jeff Bingaman of New Mexico, will be involved in the Finance Committee's work session on the health-care bill. The finance panel is set to resume its consideration of the bill on Tuesday morning.
___

A summary of House bill is available: energycommerce.house.gov/Press_11{0090724/hr2454_housesummary.pdf

___

(c) 2009, MarketWatch.com Inc.
Visit MarketWatch on the Web at www.marketwatch.com
Distributed by McClatchy-Tribune Information Services.

Explore further: Halliburton pays $1.1 bn for Gulf of Mexico BP spill

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Senators dig in on massive health care legislation

Jun 17, 2009

(AP) -- Eye-popping new cost estimates for President Barack Obama's plan to overhaul the U.S. health care system are forcing majority Democrats to scale back their plans to subsidize coverage for the uninsured.

House Democrats to open hearings on health bill

Jun 23, 2009

(AP) -- House Democrats are pushing forward with a partisan health care bill even as a key Senate Democrat labors to achieve an elusive bipartisan compromise on President Barack Obama's top legislative priority.

Senate approves ANWR oil drilling

Nov 04, 2005

The U.S. Senate gave final approval for oil drilling in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge as part of a deficit-cutting budget bill.

Warner: Climate change a national security issue

Apr 24, 2009

(AP) -- Former Vice President Al Gore, a leading voice on climate change, urged lawmakers Friday to overcome partisan differences and pass legislation to curb greenhouse gases.

Recommended for you

Halliburton pays $1.1 bn for Gulf of Mexico BP spill

11 hours ago

Oil services company Halliburton said Tuesday it would pay a $1.1 billion settlement over its role in the 2010 Gulf of Mexico oil rig blowout that led to the United States' most disastrous oil spill.

Underwater grass comeback bodes well for Chesapeake Bay

12 hours ago

The Susquehanna Flats, a large bed of underwater grasses near the mouth of the Susquehanna River, virtually disappeared from the upper Chesapeake Bay after Tropical Storm Agnes more than 40 years ago. However, ...

Clean air halves health costs in Chinese city

14 hours ago

Air pollution regulations over the last decade in Taiyuan, China, have substantially improved the health of people living there, accounting for a greater than 50% reduction in costs associated with loss of life and disability ...

User comments : 3

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

defunctdiety
5 / 5 (2) Sep 29, 2009
Under the "cap and trade" system, companies would buy and sell permits to meet emissions limits.

Anyone who is a proponent of AGW legislation really need to think about this quote carefully. Does this actually do anything to reduce carbon emissions (which is supposedly the whole point), or does it just create a cost that will be placed on the businesses and industries and in turn the consumer (which is actually the whole point). This type of legislation would be disastrous, for the environment and the People.

It's printed in plain english right there what their intentions are. Take back your government, make a simple 1 minute phone call to your law makers.
Arkaleus
not rated yet Sep 29, 2009
It's become trendy for "synchronized" legislation to sudden appear in the governments of the world. This is a disturbing trend that subordinates the United States legislature to the whims of foreign powers and groups.

Merely coordinating these types of intrusions is an effort to establish an extra-national governmental system. I don't think the majority of Americans would take kindly to our "representatives" introducing foreign agendas and attempting to ram them through the legislature.
GrayMouser
not rated yet Oct 13, 2009
Kerry, who chairs the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, said last week that the bill would be a "starting point" to win over moderate and conservative Democrats as well as Republicans, reported ClimateWire.

All the more reason not to let them get their foot in the door. Danegeld?