Air Force report: Ares I crew couldn't survive blast in first minute

Jul 19, 2009 By Mark K. Matthews

The crew of NASA's newest spacecraft "will not survive" an explosion of the Ares I rocket within the first minute of launch because blazing chunks of solid-rocket fuel would melt the parachutes on the crew-escape system, according to a new Air Force report.

The report by the 45th Space Wing at Patrick Air Force Base -- which has safety responsibility for the Cape Canaveral rocket range -- used data from an unmanned Titan IV that was blown up by safety officers when its guidance system malfunctioned soon after leaving the pad at Cape Canaveral in 1998. Like Ares I, the Titan used solid-fuel motors.

The explosion created a cone of red-hot debris that spread across nearly three miles. If a similar safety decision was made to blow up an Ares I, the report said, no escape system could blast the and its crew away from the flaming debris quickly enough to keep its parachutes from being incinerated.

"The capsule will not survive an abort (in the first minute) . . . as the capsule is engulfed until water-impact by solid propellant fragments radiating heat from 4,000F toward the nylon material (with a melt-temperature of (about) 400F)," said the 25-page report.

But Jeff Hanley, who manages NASA's Constellation program that includes the Ares I, questioned the validity of the Air Force study because it relied on only one example. He said NASA had done its own study, using supercomputers to replicate the behavior of Ares I, that predicted a safe outcome.

"We have analysis that tells today that the capsule will fly free of the danger," Hanley said. "Our analysis says . . . the crew capsule will not be exposed to the more severe environments."

He did note, however, that NASA would consider the Air Force study.

Critics countered the new report is the latest reason why Ares needs to be re-examined, or scrapped.

"This is one technical issue among many," said Mike Gold, the Washington director of Bigelow Aerospace, a commercial space company. "What we find disturbing is that any time there is an external organization looking at NASA's plans, they seem to come across an issue, and this is just one example."

The Air Force report, first published by nasawatch.com, is the second safety challenge by the 45th Space Wing to the solid-fuel first stage of Ares I. Air Force officials previously warned NASA they fear that violent shaking on liftoff of the Ares I-X, a rocket that will test the Ares I first stage, would disable the steering and self-destruct mechanisms, meaning it could not be destroyed if it veered off course.

If that problem is not fixed, the Air Force has said, the rocket cannot fly from Kennedy Space Center for fear it could endanger populated areas along the Space Coast.

This warning, and the new report, come at a crucial time for Ares I, a key element of NASA's Constellation program to return humans to the moon. An independent team is reviewing whether the Ares I -- intended to launch astronauts -- and the much larger Ares V cargo rocket are the best choices.

Alternatives include rockets that would use the main engines, boosters and giant fuel tank of the space shuttle, which is slated for retirement next year; commercial rockets now used to launch satellites; or a redesign of the liquid-fueled Ares V.

During a conference call on Friday with reporters, the head of the review team, Norm Augustine, said the panel was aware of the report and called it a "legitimate technical question" and that team members were devoting a "great deal of effort to that, among other technical questions."

In the past 18 months, outside critics and internal reports have raised several questions about Ares I, whose first stage is a five-segment stack of solid-rocket boosters like those used on the shuttle. Concerns range from price, which could cost at least $35 billion before the is ready for a 2015 mission, to technical problems.

Chief among them: violent shaking caused by the way solid-rocket fuel burns, compounded by the use of a solid-fuel motor as the primary propulsion source rather than as boosters.

The shaking, called "thrust oscillation" by engineers, continues to vex the agency. NASA officials announced this week that it is one of the issues that will delay the first test flight of the Ares I-X -- a single-stage mockup of the Ares I.

The target date of the launch, from Kennedy Space Center, was changed from Aug. 30 to Oct. 31.

"This is still a very aggressive schedule and requires a lot of tasks to complete on or before their planned dates," wrote Robert Ess, the Ares I-X mission manager, in a memo obtained by the Orlando Sentinel.

Despite the problems, Augustine denied that the panel already has declared Ares dead.

"As far as our committee is concerned, it would be completely wrong to say that Ares is dead in the water. We have looked at various versions of Ares, derivatives of Ares and alternatives to Ares, and I think it would be a totally incorrect characterization," said Augustine, former CEO of Lockheed Martin.

"We're looking at a whole bunch of possibilities," he added.

The Augustine panel should present its findings next month.

___

(c) 2009, The Orlando Sentinel (Fla.).
Visit the Sentinel on the World Wide Web at www.orlandosentinel.com/
Distributed by McClatchy-Tribune Information Services.

Explore further: India launches biggest ever rocket into space

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

NASA Successfully Tests Parachute for Ares Rocket

Mar 02, 2009

(PhysOrg.com) -- NASA and industry engineers successfully completed the second drop test of a drogue parachute for the Ares I rocket. The test took place Feb. 28 at the U.S. Army's Yuma Proving Ground near Yuma, Ariz.

NASA Successfully Tests Parachute for Ares Rocket

Jul 25, 2008

(PhysOrg.com) -- NASA and industry engineers have successfully completed the first drop test of a drogue parachute for the Ares I rocket. The drogue parachute is designed to slow the rapid descent of the spent first-stage ...

Recommended for you

Politics no problem, say US and Russian spacefarers

8 hours ago

US-Russian ties may have returned to Cold War levels, but an astronaut and a cosmonaut gearing up for the longest flight on the International Space Station said Thursday politics would not disrupt their work ...

User comments : 3

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

deatopmg
4.5 / 5 (2) Jul 19, 2009
It appears that chuffing is still nearly impossible to eliminate from large solid fuel rocket engines. Why not "keep it simple stupid" by using simple, relatively cheap and safe old fashioned LOX and Kero engines as used in the V-2, Atlas, and Apollo rockets?

Duplicate the Apollo or if even more payload capacity is needed SIMPLY do what the Russians did - more (of the same)engines and more (of the same) tanks. Stop trying to reinvent the wheel. KISS NASA!

Keno_Dan
1 / 5 (1) Jul 19, 2009
There is a very viable alternative to the Ares I . It is a space system which begins with slight modifications to the SPACE SHUTTLE. The system will, in carefully planned stages, permit a manned landing on Mars, estimated at 2029. This system uses no expensive expendable parts, uses no unpredictable solid rocket engines and uses no hard-to-store cryogenic rocket fuels. It is the CYRUS SPACE SYSTEM by Daniel Sterling Sample , space systems designer in Los Angeles.It can be reviewed at: http://www.cyrus-...stem.com
Nik_2213
not rated yet Jul 20, 2009
Or they could fund Reaction Engine's Sabre engine and fly from runway to orbit and back...

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.