Calif. board postpones decision on pollution tax

Jun 26, 2009 By SAMANTHA YOUNG , Associated Press Writer
FILE -This Sept. 22, 2006 file photo shows the Conoco Oil Refinery in Rodeo, Calif. at sunset. California refineries, utilities and companies that tap into natural gas pipelines are facing a new levy designed to pay for the state's landmark law to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. The $36.2 million fee is expected to be approved Thursday, June 25, 2009, by California air regulators in what would amount to the country's first statewide carbon fee. (AP Photo/Rich Pedroncelli, file)

(AP) -- California regulators on Thursday delayed a decision on whether to implement the nation's first statewide carbon fee on utilities, oil refineries and other polluting industries.

The move came after several electricity providers expressed concerns that California might inadvertently level a charge on energy that is moved through but not used in the state. That would violate federal energy laws.

Mary Nichols, who chairs the California Air Resources Board, says regulators still favor a carbon fee to raise the money to implement California's landmark 2006 global warming law. But they want to ensure they do so legally.

"We want this thing to be air tight," Nichols said. "We don't want to proceed with anything until we're absolutely confident what we're doing will meet every legal and constitutional test."

She said a vote will be held on the carbon fee at the board's July meeting.

The delay gave California businesses that have opposed the fee a short reprieve. , manufacturers and utilities complained Thursday that the proposal has unfairly singled them out to pay for the fee.

Industry has also argued the fee would impose another burden on California businesses while the state is mired in and experiencing its highest jobless rate - 11.5 percent - in modern times.

"Every additional cost burden adds to the already very high cost of doing business in the state," said Dorothy Rothrock, vice president of government relations at the California Manufacturers & Technology Association.

If it is adopted next month, the fee would be imposed beginning in 2010 and would raise $51.2 million annually during its first three years, leveling off at $36.2 million during the fifth year. The average cement plant would pay about $200,000 a year, while the average oil refinery would pay about $1.3 million a year.

The air board targeted the fee to industries it considers the starting point for roughly 85 percent of California's greenhouse gas emissions. For example, refineries and utility plants are the first handlers of the fuel and electricity that Californians consume every year.

About 250 businesses in California that make, sell or import gasoline, diesel, natural gas and coal would be charged roughly 12 cents per ton of carbon dioxide that they and their customers emit.

Cement plants also would be subject to the fee because the chemical process to make cement produces greenhouse gases. The charge would drop to 9 cents per ton of carbon dioxide in 2014.

Industry representatives said the air board's approach unfairly holds them accountable not just for their own emissions, but for those generated by the millions of Californians who use their products. They would like the fee spread across a broader cross-section of the economy.

"Fuels in and of themselves are not sources of greenhouse gas emissions," Michaeleen Mason, director of regulatory issues at the Western States Petroleum Association, told the board Thursday.

"Fuel producers and importers cannot be considered sources of greenhouse gas emissions," she said.

Air regulators say they need the fee to carry out the California Solutions Act, which seeks to reduce emissions in the state to 1990 levels by 2020. It is intended to cover the salaries of 174 people hired to implement the law since Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger signed it.

The air board staff projected businesses asked to pay the fee could pass along its costs to consumers.

The average restaurant, for example, would see an increase of roughly $14 a year in its electricity and natural gas costs, said Jon Costantino, manager of the climate change section at the air board. The cost to each Californian would amount to between $1 and $1.50 a year.

A few local government entities have adopted similar fees. Last year, air regulators in the San Francisco Bay area imposed a 4.4 cent per-ton carbon fee on businesses that emit greenhouse gasses. In 2006, voters in Boulder, Colo., imposed a carbon tax on their own energy use.

©2009 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Explore further: Pacific leaders say climate will claim entire nations

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Calif. approves nation's 1st low-carbon fuel rule

Apr 24, 2009

(AP) -- California air regulators on Thursday adopted a first-in-the-nation mandate requiring low-carbon fuels, part of the state's wider effort to reduce greenhouse gas emissions.

States take up global warming fight

Aug 11, 2006

Thinking the U.S. Congress has dropped the ball, state and local officials from California to North Carolina are trying to do something about global warming.

Massachusetts may drop from CO2 pact

Dec 02, 2005

Massachusetts may drop out of pact that calls for freezing power plant carbon dioxide emissions at their current levels, state sources said.

Calif. preparing to sue EPA

Oct 22, 2007

California officials are preparing to file a federal lawsuit against the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency so the state can regulate greenhouse emissions.

Global warming to carry big costs for California

Mar 12, 2009

(AP) -- From agricultural losses to devastation wrought by wildfires, California's economy is expected to see significant costs resulting from global warming in the decades ahead, according to a new report.

Recommended for you

Selective logging takes its toll on mammals, amphibians

11 hours ago

The selective logging of trees in otherwise intact tropical forests can take a serious toll on the number of animal species living there. Mammals and amphibians are particularly sensitive to the effects of ...

User comments : 4

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

GrayMouser
5 / 5 (1) Jun 26, 2009
The average restaurant, for example, would see an increase of roughly $14 a year in its electricity and natural gas costs, said Jon Costantino, manager of the climate change section at the air board. The cost to each Californian would amount to between $1 and $1.50 a year.

This is a government estimate, meaning that it probably understates the impact by a factor of 3 if not by orders of magnitude.
Choice
not rated yet Jul 01, 2009
Is .12 cents per ton of CO2 enough to have any effect on GHG reductions? One hopes the revenues will be used to further GHG reductions and not go into general funds.
dachpyarvile
not rated yet Jul 03, 2009
Yes! Oh, wait! There are not enough caves to go around... :(
dachpyarvile
not rated yet Jul 04, 2009
One other thing: Having been a native Californian for several decades of my life, I remember the last time California began levying taxes on businesses in that state. The Businesses left and threw the economy into a tailspin.

Looks like California is about to repeat a stupid mistake once again, not having learned anything from the last time they did this. The economy is bad enough without making it worse by sending everybody's jobs out of state!