Study advises Chinese government to change fuel in millions of households

Jun 19, 2009
In an effort to reduce China's high air pollution levels, a new study recommends increased use of coal briquettes (right) in Chinese households instead of traditional coal chunks for heating and cooking. Credit: Yingjun Chen, Chinese Academy of Sciences.

Scientists in China are recommending that the Chinese government consider phasing out the direct burning of traditional chunks of coal in millions of households. It suggests that the government substitute coal briquettes and improved stoves for cooking and heating to help reduce the country’s high air pollution levels.

The recommendation stems from one of the first scientific studies showing that this approach is effective in improving , including a 98 percent reduction in air pollution from tiny, inhalable particles of soot. Their study is scheduled for the July 15 issue of ACS’ Environmental Science & Technology.

In the new study, Yingjun Chen and colleagues note that government officials have said for years that coal briquettes and improved stoves with better ventilation may cut emissions, but few scientific studies have tested this claim. Millions of homes in rural China and other parts of the world burn raw coal chunks in small, low-efficiency stoves for cooking and heating. Studies indicate that emissions from incomplete coal combustion in these stoves contribute significantly to China’s serious levels — among the highest in the world.

The scientists compared emissions between traditional and improved stoves using either raw (unprocessed) coal chunks or coal briquettes. The briquettes consist of coal powder and clay and are molded into multihole columns. They found that burning briquettes in well-ventilated stoves dramatically reduced black carbon emissions by 98 percent and other emissions by more than 60 percent. The study concludes that this approach can bring about “explicit benefits in environment and health, together with possible gains in climate stabilization.”

More information: Environmental Science & Technology, Journal Article: “Deployment of Coal Briquettes and Improved Stoves: Possibly an Option for both Environment and Climate”

Provided by American Chemical Society (news : web)

Explore further: US top court to review power plant emissions rules

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Pennsylvania to issue new mercury limits

Feb 22, 2006

The Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection reportedly plans to order a substantial cut in toxic mercury emissions from coal-burning plants.

Near Zero Emissions Coal study launched in Beijing

Nov 20, 2007

China’s CO2 emissions from using coal are set to double by 2030, the scale of which is significant in the context of mitigating global climate change. In view of the essential role of coal in China’s energy system, it ...

Recommended for you

Tool kit for ocean health

25 minutes ago

The ocean is undergoing global changes at a remarkable pace and we must change with it to attain our best possible future ocean, warns the head of The University of Western Australia's Oceans Institute.

Researcher studies interactions between land and water

45 minutes ago

Early one morning last January, MIT undergraduate Theresa Oehmke was eating breakfast at the Kilauea Military Camp on Hawaii's Big Island when a colleague burst into the room, yelling, "Oh my god, the plume, ...

Geoengineering our climate is not a 'quick fix'

2 hours ago

The deliberate, large-scale intervention in the Earth's climate system is not a "quick fix" for global warming, according to the findings of the UK's first publicly funded studies on geoengineering.

US to propose stricter smog standard

4 hours ago

Coming full circle on a campaign promise, the Obama administration will propose Wednesday to reduce the amount of smog-forming pollution allowed in the air, which has been linked to asthma, lung damage and ...

Sao Paulo drought issue for global concern

4 hours ago

He cast his rod happily here for 30 years—but where a river once teemed with fish, Brazilian fisherman Ernane da Silva these days stares out over a valley of weeds and bone dry, sun-parched land.

User comments : 5

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

omatumr
1 / 5 (3) Jun 20, 2009
NOW ALL WE NEED IS MORE GOVERNMENT CONTROL

Scientists receiving government funds discovered "that burning briquettes in well-ventilated stoves dramatically reduced black carbon emissions by 98 percent and other emissions by more than 60 percent" and concluded that this can bring about "explicit benefits in environment and health, together with possible gains in climate stabilization."

How about just using "well-ventilated stoves" to burn whatever fuel one is currently burning?

Or does the Chinese government also own the factory making coal briquettes?

Should coal briquettes be produced in "well-ventilated" government factories?

Apparently members of the Chinese Academy of Sciences have also learned how to sleep with politicians.

With kind regards,
Oliver K. Manuel
http://www.omatumr.com/

Nemo
5 / 5 (3) Jun 20, 2009
Government control can be a very good thing if the government is wise. In this case trying to stop the Chinese people from harming themselves seems like an excellent idea.
omatumr
1 / 5 (2) Jun 20, 2009
HOW DOES A RABBIT DIG A HOLE WITHOUT
LEAVING ANY DIRT AROUND THE OPENING?

Government control can be a very good thing if the government is wise. In this case trying to stop the Chinese people from harming themselves seems like an excellent idea.


When bureaucrats become wise, . . . . they will

a.) Understand that "well-ventilated" processes are those that dump pollution directly into air, and

b.) Ask how clean-burning coal briquettes are made from dirty coal without polluting air.

THE RABBIT STARTS AT THE BOTTOM AND DIGS UP!

With kind regards,
Oliver K. Manuel
http://www.omatumr.com/
SteveS
5 / 5 (1) Jun 21, 2009
I Agree with Nemo.

A fine example of "MORE GOVERMENT CONTROL" is the 1956 Clean Air Act in Britain. This was prompted by the London Smog Disaster of 1952 which killed 4000 people in ten days.

This Act was directed at domestic and industrial sources of smoke pollution, authorising local councils to set up smokeless zones and make grants to householders to convert their homes from traditional coal fires to heaters fuelled by gas, oil, smokeless coal or electricity.

There was initial resistence to the legislation as some people resented being told what they could or couldn't do in there own homes, but few now doubt that this level of regulation of both private and commercial smoke emissions was necessary.





Honor
not rated yet Jun 22, 2009
i need to invest in chinese coal briquettes

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.