Space junk raises risks for Hubble repair mission

May 12, 2009 By SETH BORENSTEIN , AP Science Writer
This computer generated image, supplied by NASA, shows objects that are currently being tracked in Earth orbit. Approximately 95% of the objects in this illustration are orbital debris, i.e., not functional satellites. The dots represent each item. The orbital debris dots are scaled according to the image size of the graphic to optimize their visibility and are not scaled to Earth. This image provide a good visualization of where the greatest orbital debris populations exist. The space shuttle Atlantis is flying at about 350 miles above Earth, an area littered with more dangerous space junk than the lower orbits where shuttles normally park at the international space station. (AP Photo/NASA)

(AP) -- Space shuttle Atlantis is now in a rough orbital neighborhood - a place littered with thousands of pieces of space junk zipping around the Earth at nearly 20,000 mph. There are more pieces of shattered satellites and used-up rockets in this region than astronauts have ever encountered. And the crew must be there for more than a week to repair the Hubble Space Telescope. As soon as the job is complete, the shuttle will scamper to safety.

The telescope orbits about 350 miles above Earth, a far dirtier place than where shuttles normally fly. And all those tiny projectiles raise the constant threat of a potentially fatal collision.

"It's a riskier environment when we go to this altitude," said NASA safety chief Bryan O'Connor, a former shuttle commander. But, he added, it's a risk that NASA can handle.

After the 2003 Columbia accident, just going up to Hubble was deemed too dangerous because flying to the telescope entails climbing to a different orbit than the . That means the shuttle cannot use the outpost as a safe harbor in an emergency.

NASA now puts the risk for a catastrophic collision with junk during the mission at 1 in 229 - greater than typical flights to the space station but lower than the agency's initial estimates.

On Wednesday, the crew will grab the telescope and tuck it inside the shuttle's cargo bay, where spacewalking astronauts will make repairs and upgrades over the next week. The work begins Thursday.

The crew spent Tuesday checking the outside of the shuttle for any damage from debris during launch, finding four nicks that initially seem minor. It's a standard procedure since Columbia got hit by a piece of foam during launch and later disintegrated during re-entry.

But the biggest danger on any shuttle flight is getting hit with space junk or tiny space rocks at high speeds during orbit, not during launch. Because objects circle the Earth at high speed, something as small as one-third the width of a dime can penetrate the shuttle's cabin, causing a major - maybe even fatal - problem, according to NASA.

And where Atlantis is camped out has only gotten messier recently. In 2007, China destroyed one of its satellites to test a weapon, scattering debris. In February, a dead Russian satellite and an American communications satellite collided, spreading more trash in higher orbits.

So far, space junk trackers have spotted about 950 pieces from this year's crash and more than 2,500 from the 2007 explosion. And there's much more they have not seen.

Harvard astronomer Jonathan McDowell, who tracks objects in orbit, said "people are going to be watching (Atlantis' mission) very carefully. It's a real danger."

While it's unlikely debris will cause a serious problem, McDowell expects Atlantis to come home "with a couple major dings in its windshield or radiator."

NASA's top space junk expert said it's important to put the worries into perspective.

"It's not something to lose sleep over," said NASA chief space debris scientist Nicholas Johnson. "We do take it very, very seriously, but in the scheme of things, it's a small risk."

Still, Johnson acknowledged that the higher orbit is far more dangerous than the space station's position 225 miles above Earth.

"Hubble is being pummeled regularly," Johnson said. "We see evidence of thousands of impacts."

Initially, when Johnson and other experts at the Johnson Space Center calculated the risk for losing Atlantis because of debris, it was slightly worse than 1 in 200.

That's the threshold for NASA to think twice about doing the flight. Engineers came up with some maneuvers to reduce the likelihood of getting hit, and have now decided the risk is an acceptable 1 in 229. That risk is usually about 1 in 300 during space station missions.

NASA canceled this Hubble mission in 2004, citing the risks of not being able to go to the space station in case of emergency. But the mission was reinstated after engineers devised ways to patch damage in flight, and the space agency created a plan for a quick rescue flight if needed. The shuttle Endeavour sits on the launch pad on standby to retrieve the Atlantis crew if the shuttle is too damaged to fly home.

NASA also found other ways to curb the risk of damage. As soon as Atlantis finishes fixing Hubble and places it back in orbit, the shuttle will skedaddle down to a lower, cleaner and safer orbit. The crew will also make another inspection of the shuttle before heading back to Earth.

In addition, Atlantis is flying an egg-shaped orbit, going as high as 350 miles to catch up to Hubble, but also dropping as close as 135 miles, making it less prone to space junk and easier for a rescue flight if necessary, according to NASA spokesman Rob Navias.

The Air Force is tracking more than 19,000 objects in all sorts of orbits - most of it junk.

The dirtiest spots are at 525 miles up where the Chinese satellite was destroyed and 490 miles, where the Russian-American satellite collision occurred.

Even though the Hubble-Atlantis orbit is more than 100 miles below those zones, it's too close for complete comfort. That's because the trash spreads into nearby orbits, Johnson said.

And the higher the orbits, the longer it stays aloft because there's even less drag from the ultra-thin atmosphere pulling stuff down. For example, a 4-inch object 490 miles up will stay in orbit for more than a century, Johnson said.

At Hubble's altitude, the same object would come down in about a decade; from the space station, it would be gone in a few months.

The Air Force Space Command tracks debris larger than 4 inches and gives warning to NASA and others if trash is projected to come close to astronauts. Twice in the past year, NASA has moved the space station to dodge nearby junk. But that's only the debris the Air Force can track.

Objects between one-tenth of an inch and 4 inches are dangerous enough to cause major and even fatal damage, but cannot be specifically tracked.

"The greatest risk to space missions comes from the non-trackable debris," Johnson said.

---

On the Net

NASA Orbital Debris Program Office: http://www.orbitaldebris.jsc.nasa.gov

©2009 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Explore further: Tidal forces gave moon its shape, according to new analysis

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Rescue shuttle at launch pad for Hubble trip

May 10, 2009

(AP) -- In what's expected to be the last time ever, both of NASA's shuttle launch pads are occupied. Atlantis is on one, primed for a flight this coming week to the Hubble Space Telescope. Endeavour sits ...

NASA Updates Shuttle Target Launch Date for Hubble Mission

Jun 07, 2007

NASA managers officially are targeting Sept. 10, 2008, for the launch of the fifth and final space shuttle servicing mission to the Hubble Space Telescope. During the 11-day flight, Atlantis' seven astronauts will repair ...

Rescue shuttle moved to launch pad just in case

Apr 17, 2009

(AP) -- Space shuttle Endeavour is on a launch pad, ready to rocket off on a rescue mission if shuttle Atlantis needs help when it flies to repair the Hubble Space Telescope next month.

Recommended for you

Exploring Mars in low Earth orbit

4 hours ago

In their quest to understand life's potential beyond Earth, astrobiologists study how organisms might survive in numerous environments, from the surface of Mars to the ice-covered oceans of Jupiter's moon, ...

Lifetime of gravity measurements heralds new beginning

6 hours ago

Although ESA's GOCE satellite is no more, all of the measurements it gathered during its life skirting the fringes our atmosphere, including the very last as it drifted slowly back to Earth, have been drawn ...

NASA's IceCube no longer on ice

10 hours ago

NASA's Science Mission Directorate (SMD) has chosen a team at NASA's Goddard Space Flight Center in Greenbelt, Maryland, to build its first Earth science-related CubeSat mission.

User comments : 9

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

djp
3 / 5 (2) May 12, 2009
I wonder who put the debris there in the first place. We are our own obstacle to a better future.
PB94941
5 / 5 (2) May 12, 2009
Best job ever - shooting space junk out of our orbit.. somebody hire me =D
GrayMouser
5 / 5 (2) May 12, 2009
I wonder who put the debris there in the first place. We are our own obstacle to a better future.

Don't worry, some, unknown, percentage is natural. Not that it makes any difference to the target.
PPihkala
2 / 5 (1) May 12, 2009
I think all that trash is the legacy of human space exploration. We have been too eager to leave there our discarded equipment. I also think that someone should think how to clean those orbits. Maybe with solar powered satellite that uses laser to burn them. Or maybe by making a big net that can be used to catch those particles. But probably there are very few if none affordable ways to clean it up. :(
Yes
4 / 5 (2) May 12, 2009
The only solution may be a big Q-Switched laser that can can push debris to a lower orbit so it will burn up in the atmosphere.
But try to bring up one of these lasers in orbit. Any country will say that cleaning up space debris is just a justification for military operations.
A great example that the necessary can't be done.
tkjtkj
5 / 5 (2) May 13, 2009
re: "This computer generated image, supplied by NASA, shows objects that are currently being tracked in Earth orbit."



I find it hard to accept that rendering of the density-spread of orbiting objects. It's not conceivable to me that there is no hint whatsoever of any increased density in the plane of the earth's equator: most launches, by far take advantage of earth's rotation (to gain payload!) by launching in that plane .. The image, however seems to show, if anything, a suggestion of increased objects in the polar orbit plane .. this seems counter-intuitive ..

I smell a 'space rat' here!



i'd welcome some email'd commentary! thanks!

tkjtkj@gmail.com

zevkirsh
3 / 5 (2) May 13, 2009
particle beams to blast these things into the earths atmosphere. only way to go.
Egnite
2 / 5 (1) May 13, 2009
Send a space [recycling] station into orbit and we could start building in space without the huge costs of getting some of the materials into orbit.
holoman
1 / 5 (1) May 13, 2009
Blasting garbage into Earths atmosphere not
recommended, it would be better to send it on its
way into space.

The Earth's environment is contaminated enough and unless the garbage is taken down to its species and the species combine in some Earth friendly way
would not recommend reintroduction.