Study of 'Persistent Currents' Finally Verifies Theory

Apr 28, 2009 by Laura Mgrdichian feature
A graphical representation of one of the gold rings. Like some of the rings, this one is connected to a metallic "bank" to absorb the heat load from the scanning SQUID. Image courtesy Kathryn Moler.

(PhysOrg.com) -- Approximately 20 years ago, scientists discovered that is is possible for an electric current to flow endlessly in a ring made of a normal metal. One might think that such an 'old' finding would be well understood and no longer interesting to today's researchers, but scientists are still studying the phenomenon.

In a recent and particularly successful example of this, researchers from Stanford University and the University of Colorado, Denver, completed an experiment that confirms the physics theory regarding the behavior of persistent currents in rings made of normal (not superconducting) metal.

The study’s lead researcher, Stanford physicist Kathryn Moler, told PhysOrg.com, “I began thinking about this experiment even before I joined the Stanford faculty in 1997. It took a long time to get the apparatus to be sensitive enough to detect the currents because they are so small.”

The group’s work marks the first time that the theory has been experimentally proven to a high degree.

“Persistent currents have fascinated physicists for decades,” added co-researcher Hendrik Bluhm, currently a postdoctoral scientist at Harvard University. “But the quantitative experimental verification of this phenomenon has remained elusive because of the difficulty of detecting, without disturbing the effect, the tiny current that corresponds to a single electron traveling around the ring.

“Our study of more than thirty individual rings, in which we employed a scanning technique to overcome some of these challenges, shows good agreement with theoretical expectations.”

The rings are very small, each only between one and two micrometers (millionths of a meter) in diameter and 140 nanometers (billionths of a meter) thick. They are made of high-purity gold. Each was scanned individually, unlike past experiments on persistent currents conducted by other groups. In total they were scanned approximately 10 million times.

The scanning device is a SQUID microscope. A SQUID, or superconducting quantum interference device, can detect extremely small magnetic fields like those produced by the circulating currents in the rings.

The physics theory behind persistent currents in normal metal rings states, in part, that the persistent current is a periodic function, or a repeating pattern, of the applied magnetic field. The direction of the current as well as its amplitude vary from ring to ring because the rings are not identical.

The theory also predicts that the currents should decrease in size as the temperature of the rings increases.

Bluhm and his colleagues were able to experimentally verify both parts of the theory. When they created a graphical representation of the amplitudes of the flux as measured using the SQUID microscope, the resulting picture was a close match to what theory predicts they should see. How the amplitudes were affected by the temperature of the rings also agrees well with theoretical predictions, at least within the limited temperature range they worked in.

This research is published in the March 30, 2009, online edition of Physical Review Letters.

More information: Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 136802 (2009)

Copyright 2009 PhysOrg.com.
All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed in whole or part without the express written permission of PhysOrg.com.

Explore further: What is Nothing?

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Miniature Doughnuts

Mar 15, 2005

A matter of capillary action: colloid crystals as molds for nanorings It isn't only prospective bridal couples that are interested in rings; engineers and scientists are also fascinated by the apparently near-magical properti ...

The Ultimate Test of Atom and Neutron Neutrality

Apr 17, 2008

Researchers from Stanford University have proposed a new way to test the neutrality of an atom and even a neutron, a method they say will be far more sensitive than current methods, able to probe the charge ...

Recommended for you

What is Nothing?

Aug 22, 2014

Is there any place in the Universe where there's truly nothing? Consider the gaps between stars and galaxies? Or the gaps between atoms? What are the properties of nothing?

On the hunt for dark matter

Aug 22, 2014

New University of Adelaide Future Fellow Dr Martin White is starting a research project that has the potential to redirect the experiments of thousands of physicists around the world who are trying to identify the nature ...

Water window imaging opportunity

Aug 21, 2014

Ever heard of the water window? It consists of radiations in the 3.3 to 4.4 nanometre range, which are not absorbed by the water in biological tissues. New theoretical findings show that it is possible to ...

User comments : 6

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

E_L_Earnhardt
3.7 / 5 (3) Apr 28, 2009
I wonder if the "squid" could read currents inside the cell? Here is where you could detect the TRUE operation and malfunction of the cell. Mitosis begins with electrons breaking hydrogen bonds!
TJ_alberta
not rated yet Apr 28, 2009
E_L - interesting idea but I am wondering if the available resolution of the squid microscope up to the job -- if it involves resolving structures inside a cell nucleus. And what about all the electrons being transferred inside mitochondria -- would that make "noise" ...
earls
not rated yet Apr 29, 2009
If you can go cold to superconducting can you go superconducting to cold?
Thecis
not rated yet Apr 29, 2009
If there is a current and thus an electric and magnetic field, could you use the flux? (thus using it as a powersource)?
earls
not rated yet Apr 29, 2009
Thecis, yes, of course, this is on par with superconducting energy storage... The problem is this is effect is amazingly pathetically minute.

If you're suggesting "free energy" you should know better. :) The current in the ring was induced, not "naturally" occurring.
MadLintElf
not rated yet Apr 29, 2009